玻璃离聚体水泥、复合材料、树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥修复材料的微渗漏和剪切粘结强度的体外比较研究

Amanjot Singh, Sumeet Singh Jaurha, Harkamal Pannu, Amritpreet Kaur
{"title":"玻璃离聚体水泥、复合材料、树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥修复材料的微渗漏和剪切粘结强度的体外比较研究","authors":"Amanjot Singh, Sumeet Singh Jaurha, Harkamal Pannu, Amritpreet Kaur","doi":"10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Evaluation of microleakage and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement, composite, resin modified glass ionomer Cement Restorative Material. Material and Method: Thirty freshly extracted non carious teeth, free of cracks and restorations, collected for the present in-vitro study. Teeth were divided in three equal group i.e. group A: Glass Ionomer Cement. Group B: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, Group C: Composite Resin. All groups' shear bond strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. A rod in the shape of a chisel was positioned close to the bonded restorative material and directly next to the flat dentinal surface. To debond the material, a cross head of universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5mm/min was employed. Then, Mega Pascal Units (MPa) were used to calculate the shear bond strength. To evaluate the microleakage two coats of nail polish were applied to the samples, leaving a 1 mm window around the cavity boundaries. A wet cotton pellet was placed over the restoration to avoid desiccation while the nail polish was being applied. Inverted teeth were submerged for 24 hours at 37°C under vacuum in a solution of 2% Rhodamine-B dye. Only the coronal part of the teeth were dyed to avoid dye leakage via the root apices. The surface-adhered dye was washed off the specimens in tap water after removing them from the dye solution, and nail polish was then removed with a BP blade. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction through the center of the restorations using a water-cooled low-speed diamond disc. The section with the greater leakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification to determine the extent of dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins by two evaluators who were blinded to the experimental groups. Result: Composite resin showed highest shear bond strength followed by Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and least with conventional glass ionomer cement. Microleakage was found lower in composite resin as compared to Resin modified glass ionomer cement and glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: It can be stated that Composite resin and Resin modified glass ionomer cement have good shear bond strength and lower microleakage as compared to Glass Ionomer Cement.","PeriodicalId":93501,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Material: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Amanjot Singh, Sumeet Singh Jaurha, Harkamal Pannu, Amritpreet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Evaluation of microleakage and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement, composite, resin modified glass ionomer Cement Restorative Material. Material and Method: Thirty freshly extracted non carious teeth, free of cracks and restorations, collected for the present in-vitro study. Teeth were divided in three equal group i.e. group A: Glass Ionomer Cement. Group B: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, Group C: Composite Resin. All groups' shear bond strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. A rod in the shape of a chisel was positioned close to the bonded restorative material and directly next to the flat dentinal surface. To debond the material, a cross head of universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5mm/min was employed. Then, Mega Pascal Units (MPa) were used to calculate the shear bond strength. To evaluate the microleakage two coats of nail polish were applied to the samples, leaving a 1 mm window around the cavity boundaries. A wet cotton pellet was placed over the restoration to avoid desiccation while the nail polish was being applied. Inverted teeth were submerged for 24 hours at 37°C under vacuum in a solution of 2% Rhodamine-B dye. Only the coronal part of the teeth were dyed to avoid dye leakage via the root apices. The surface-adhered dye was washed off the specimens in tap water after removing them from the dye solution, and nail polish was then removed with a BP blade. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction through the center of the restorations using a water-cooled low-speed diamond disc. The section with the greater leakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification to determine the extent of dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins by two evaluators who were blinded to the experimental groups. Result: Composite resin showed highest shear bond strength followed by Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and least with conventional glass ionomer cement. Microleakage was found lower in composite resin as compared to Resin modified glass ionomer cement and glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: It can be stated that Composite resin and Resin modified glass ionomer cement have good shear bond strength and lower microleakage as compared to Glass Ionomer Cement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SVOA Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SVOA Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价玻璃离聚体水泥、复合材料、树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥修复材料的微渗漏和剪切强度。材料与方法:收集30颗新鲜拔牙、无裂纹、无修复体的无龋牙进行体外研究。牙齿分为三组,即A组:玻璃离子水泥。B组:树脂改性玻璃离子水泥;C组:复合树脂。使用万能试验机评估各组剪切粘接强度。一根凿子形状的棒被放置在粘接修复材料附近,并直接靠近平坦的牙本质表面。采用万能试验机的十字头以0.5mm/min的速度进行材料剥离。然后用兆帕斯卡单位(MPa)计算剪切强度。为了评估微泄漏,在样品上涂了两层指甲油,在空腔边界周围留下1毫米的窗口。在涂指甲油时,在修复处放置湿棉球以避免干燥。倒置牙在2%罗丹明- b染料溶液中,37℃真空浸泡24小时。仅染色冠状部分的牙齿,以避免染料通过根尖泄漏。将标本从染料溶液中取出后,用自来水冲洗表面粘附的染料,然后用BP刀片去除指甲油。采用水冷低速金刚石盘沿颊-舌方向通过修复体中心纵向切片。两名评估员对实验组进行盲测,在×25放大镜下对渗漏较大的部分进行评估,以确定染料在咬合和牙龈边缘的渗透程度。结果:复合树脂的抗剪强度最高,其次为树脂改性玻璃离子水门合剂,与常规玻璃离子水门合剂的抗剪强度最低。与树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥和玻璃离聚体水泥相比,复合树脂的微渗漏率较低。结论:复合树脂和树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥与玻璃离聚体水泥相比,具有较好的剪切粘结强度和较低的微渗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement, Composite, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Material: An In Vitro Study
Aim: Evaluation of microleakage and shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement, composite, resin modified glass ionomer Cement Restorative Material. Material and Method: Thirty freshly extracted non carious teeth, free of cracks and restorations, collected for the present in-vitro study. Teeth were divided in three equal group i.e. group A: Glass Ionomer Cement. Group B: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, Group C: Composite Resin. All groups' shear bond strengths were evaluated using a universal testing machine. A rod in the shape of a chisel was positioned close to the bonded restorative material and directly next to the flat dentinal surface. To debond the material, a cross head of universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5mm/min was employed. Then, Mega Pascal Units (MPa) were used to calculate the shear bond strength. To evaluate the microleakage two coats of nail polish were applied to the samples, leaving a 1 mm window around the cavity boundaries. A wet cotton pellet was placed over the restoration to avoid desiccation while the nail polish was being applied. Inverted teeth were submerged for 24 hours at 37°C under vacuum in a solution of 2% Rhodamine-B dye. Only the coronal part of the teeth were dyed to avoid dye leakage via the root apices. The surface-adhered dye was washed off the specimens in tap water after removing them from the dye solution, and nail polish was then removed with a BP blade. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction through the center of the restorations using a water-cooled low-speed diamond disc. The section with the greater leakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification to determine the extent of dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins by two evaluators who were blinded to the experimental groups. Result: Composite resin showed highest shear bond strength followed by Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and least with conventional glass ionomer cement. Microleakage was found lower in composite resin as compared to Resin modified glass ionomer cement and glass ionomer cement. Conclusion: It can be stated that Composite resin and Resin modified glass ionomer cement have good shear bond strength and lower microleakage as compared to Glass Ionomer Cement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信