{"title":"德国白内障手术:2018年德国白内障和屈光手术质量结果登记处的数据","authors":"C. Schäferhoff, J. Förster, B. Schneider","doi":"10.4236/ojoph.2020.104033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The German registry for \ncataract surgery was established in 2014. The main \naim of this registry was to improve cataract surgery outcomes. Aim: The \naim of this project is to offer a tool for benchmarking through the establishment of a reference database in Germany \nwhere surgeons could record and analyze their own outcomes. Methods: Data \nwere collected between January 2018 and December 2018. The analyzed data \nincluded parameters of surgical technique, implanted intraocular lens (IOL), \nrefractive and visual outcomes. Results: During the year of 2018, the \nGerman registry included 10,035 lens exchange surgeries and the complete \nfollow-up was available for 9882 lens extractions. Approximately one third of \nthe patients were between 76 and 80 years old and 60.6% of the cases had a \nbest-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before surgery of 0.5 or better. \nParabulbar anesthesia was reported in 60.4% of the cases and \nphacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber IOL was the chosen \nmethod in 92.2% of the cases. The power of the implanted IOL was between 21.0 - 22.9D in 29.4% of eyes. Surgical complications were \nreported in only 413 cases. After surgery, a CDVA \nof 0.5 or better was achieved in 90.8% of the cases. Most of the operated patients (64%) had a residual refractive error within ±0.5D (95% confidence \ninterval 63.2 - 65.1). Conclusions: Our results show that the registry was implementedsuccessfully with results comparable to the ones reported in EUREQUO.","PeriodicalId":60672,"journal":{"name":"眼科学期刊(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cataract Surgery in Germany: Data from a German Registry on Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery in the Year 2018\",\"authors\":\"C. Schäferhoff, J. Förster, B. Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojoph.2020.104033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The German registry for \\ncataract surgery was established in 2014. The main \\naim of this registry was to improve cataract surgery outcomes. Aim: The \\naim of this project is to offer a tool for benchmarking through the establishment of a reference database in Germany \\nwhere surgeons could record and analyze their own outcomes. Methods: Data \\nwere collected between January 2018 and December 2018. The analyzed data \\nincluded parameters of surgical technique, implanted intraocular lens (IOL), \\nrefractive and visual outcomes. Results: During the year of 2018, the \\nGerman registry included 10,035 lens exchange surgeries and the complete \\nfollow-up was available for 9882 lens extractions. Approximately one third of \\nthe patients were between 76 and 80 years old and 60.6% of the cases had a \\nbest-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before surgery of 0.5 or better. \\nParabulbar anesthesia was reported in 60.4% of the cases and \\nphacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber IOL was the chosen \\nmethod in 92.2% of the cases. The power of the implanted IOL was between 21.0 - 22.9D in 29.4% of eyes. Surgical complications were \\nreported in only 413 cases. After surgery, a CDVA \\nof 0.5 or better was achieved in 90.8% of the cases. Most of the operated patients (64%) had a residual refractive error within ±0.5D (95% confidence \\ninterval 63.2 - 65.1). Conclusions: Our results show that the registry was implementedsuccessfully with results comparable to the ones reported in EUREQUO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":60672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"眼科学期刊(英文)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"眼科学期刊(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2020.104033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"眼科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2020.104033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cataract Surgery in Germany: Data from a German Registry on Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery in the Year 2018
Background: The German registry for
cataract surgery was established in 2014. The main
aim of this registry was to improve cataract surgery outcomes. Aim: The
aim of this project is to offer a tool for benchmarking through the establishment of a reference database in Germany
where surgeons could record and analyze their own outcomes. Methods: Data
were collected between January 2018 and December 2018. The analyzed data
included parameters of surgical technique, implanted intraocular lens (IOL),
refractive and visual outcomes. Results: During the year of 2018, the
German registry included 10,035 lens exchange surgeries and the complete
follow-up was available for 9882 lens extractions. Approximately one third of
the patients were between 76 and 80 years old and 60.6% of the cases had a
best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before surgery of 0.5 or better.
Parabulbar anesthesia was reported in 60.4% of the cases and
phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber IOL was the chosen
method in 92.2% of the cases. The power of the implanted IOL was between 21.0 - 22.9D in 29.4% of eyes. Surgical complications were
reported in only 413 cases. After surgery, a CDVA
of 0.5 or better was achieved in 90.8% of the cases. Most of the operated patients (64%) had a residual refractive error within ±0.5D (95% confidence
interval 63.2 - 65.1). Conclusions: Our results show that the registry was implementedsuccessfully with results comparable to the ones reported in EUREQUO.