{"title":"SARC-F问卷确定老年心血管疾病患者的身体限制并预测出院后的预后","authors":"Shinya Tanaka, Kentaro Kamiya, Nobuaki Hamazaki, Ryota Matsuzawa, Kohei Nozaki, Yuta Ichinosawa, Manae Harada, Takeshi Nakamura, Emi Maekawa, Chiharu Noda, Minako Yamaoka-Tojo, Atsuhiko Matsunaga, Takashi Masuda, Junya Ako","doi":"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F <4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F <4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease\",\"authors\":\"Shinya Tanaka, Kentaro Kamiya, Nobuaki Hamazaki, Ryota Matsuzawa, Kohei Nozaki, Yuta Ichinosawa, Manae Harada, Takeshi Nakamura, Emi Maekawa, Chiharu Noda, Minako Yamaoka-Tojo, Atsuhiko Matsunaga, Takashi Masuda, Junya Ako\",\"doi\":\"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F <4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F <4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease
Background
A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.
Methods and results
The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F <4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F <4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).
Conclusions
SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.