SARC-F问卷确定老年心血管疾病患者的身体限制并预测出院后的预后

Shinya Tanaka, Kentaro Kamiya, Nobuaki Hamazaki, Ryota Matsuzawa, Kohei Nozaki, Yuta Ichinosawa, Manae Harada, Takeshi Nakamura, Emi Maekawa, Chiharu Noda, Minako Yamaoka-Tojo, Atsuhiko Matsunaga, Takashi Masuda, Junya Ako
{"title":"SARC-F问卷确定老年心血管疾病患者的身体限制并预测出院后的预后","authors":"Shinya Tanaka,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya,&nbsp;Nobuaki Hamazaki,&nbsp;Ryota Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Kohei Nozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Ichinosawa,&nbsp;Manae Harada,&nbsp;Takeshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Emi Maekawa,&nbsp;Chiharu Noda,&nbsp;Minako Yamaoka-Tojo,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Takashi Masuda,&nbsp;Junya Ako","doi":"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F &lt;4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F &lt;4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F &lt;4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease\",\"authors\":\"Shinya Tanaka,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya,&nbsp;Nobuaki Hamazaki,&nbsp;Ryota Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Kohei Nozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Ichinosawa,&nbsp;Manae Harada,&nbsp;Takeshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Emi Maekawa,&nbsp;Chiharu Noda,&nbsp;Minako Yamaoka-Tojo,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Takashi Masuda,&nbsp;Junya Ako\",\"doi\":\"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F &lt;4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F &lt;4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F &lt;4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v3i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景一种简单、廉价的肌少症筛查工具将有助于临床实践。本研究旨在确定SARC-F问卷是否可以用于识别老年心血管疾病(CVD)患者的身体限制和不良预后。方法和结果研究人群包括257例年龄≥65岁的日本CVD患者。出院前,测量所有患者的SARC-F、握力、通常步态速度、短时体能电池评分和6分钟步行距离。根据SARC-F评分将患者分为SARC-F <4和SARC-F≥4两组。研究终点为首次发生的全因紧急再入院或全因死亡。SARC-F≥4的患病率为26.8%,随年龄和合并症数量的增加而增加。即使在调整协变量后,与SARC-F <4组相比,SARC-F≥4组的身体功能明显较差,身体功能测量低于临界临界值的风险更高。60例(23.3%)患者再次入院,17例(6.6%)患者死亡,中位随访时间为11个月(四分位数范围:6-13个月)。SARC-F评分是出院后不良事件的显著预测因子。SARC-F≥4的患者发生事件的风险高于SARC-F≥4的患者(校正风险比:1.78;95%置信区间:1.03-3.07;P = 0.040)。结论SARC-F问卷有助于识别老年CVD患者身体受限的高危患者,并预测其出院后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease

SARC-F questionnaire identifies physical limitations and predicts post discharge outcomes in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease

Background

A simple and inexpensive sarcopenia screening tool would be beneficial in clinical practice. This study was performed to determine whether SARC-F questionnaire can be used to identify physical limitations and poor prognosis in elderly cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients.

Methods and results

The study population consisted of 257 Japanese patients ≥65 years old admitted to our hospital for CVD. Prior to discharge from hospital, SARC-F, handgrip strength, usual gait speed, short physical performance battery score, and 6-minute walking distance were measured in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to SARC-F score: SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4. The study endpoint was the first occurrence of all-cause emergency readmission or all-cause mortality. The prevalence rate of SARC-F ≥4 was 26.8%, and increased with age and number of comorbidities. Even after adjusting for covariates, physical function was significantly poorer and the risks of physical function measurements below the critical cut-off values were higher in the SARC-F ≥4 group compared to the SARC-F <4 group. Sixty (23.3%) patients were readmitted and 17 (6.6%) died over a median follow-up period of 11 months (interquartile range: 6–13 months). SARC-F score was a significant predictor of adverse events after discharge. Patients with SARC-F ≥4 showed higher event risk than those with SARC-F <4 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07; P = 0.040).

Conclusions

SARC-F questionnaire is useful to identify patients at high risk of physical limitations and to predict post-discharge outcomes in elderly CVD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信