用人工智能评估结直肠癌常规计算机断层扫描的身体成分:BodySegAI介绍

Dena Helene Alavi, Tomas Sakinis, Hege Berg Henriksen, Benedicte Beichmann, Ann-Monica Fløtten, Rune Blomhoff, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen
{"title":"用人工智能评估结直肠癌常规计算机断层扫描的身体成分:BodySegAI介绍","authors":"Dena Helene Alavi,&nbsp;Tomas Sakinis,&nbsp;Hege Berg Henriksen,&nbsp;Benedicte Beichmann,&nbsp;Ann-Monica Fløtten,&nbsp;Rune Blomhoff,&nbsp;Peter Mæhre Lauritzen","doi":"10.1002/crt2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Body composition is of clinical importance in colorectal cancer patients, but is rarely assessed because of time-consuming manual segmentation. We developed and tested BodySegAI, a deep learning-based software for automated body composition quantification from routinely acquired computed tomography (CT) scans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 2989 abdominal CT slices from L2 to S1 to segment skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intermuscular and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Human ground truth was established by combining segmentations from three human readers. BodySegAI was tested using 154 slices against the human ground truth and compared with a software named AutoMATiCA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median Dice scores for BodySegAI against human ground truth were 0.969, 0.814, 0.986, and 0.990 for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT, respectively. The mean differences per slice for SM were −0.09 cm<sup>3</sup>, IMAT: −0.17 cm<sup>3</sup>, VAT: −0.12 cm<sup>3</sup>, and SAT: 0.67 cm<sup>3</sup>. Median absolute errors for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT were 1.35, 10.54, 0.91, and 1.07%, respectively. When analysing different anatomical levels separately, L3 and S1 demonstrated the overall highest and lowest Dice scores, respectively. On average, BodySegAI segmented 148 times faster than human readers (4.9 vs. 726.5 seconds, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Also, BodySegAI presented higher Dice scores for SM, IMAT, SAT, and VAT than AutoMATiCA (slices = 154).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BodySegAI rapidly generates excellent segmentation of SM, VAT, and SAT and good segmentation of IMAT in L2 to S1 among colorectal cancer patients and may replace semi-manual segmentation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crt2.53","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body composition assessment by artificial intelligence from routine computed tomography scans in colorectal cancer: Introducing BodySegAI\",\"authors\":\"Dena Helene Alavi,&nbsp;Tomas Sakinis,&nbsp;Hege Berg Henriksen,&nbsp;Benedicte Beichmann,&nbsp;Ann-Monica Fløtten,&nbsp;Rune Blomhoff,&nbsp;Peter Mæhre Lauritzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/crt2.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Body composition is of clinical importance in colorectal cancer patients, but is rarely assessed because of time-consuming manual segmentation. We developed and tested BodySegAI, a deep learning-based software for automated body composition quantification from routinely acquired computed tomography (CT) scans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 2989 abdominal CT slices from L2 to S1 to segment skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intermuscular and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Human ground truth was established by combining segmentations from three human readers. BodySegAI was tested using 154 slices against the human ground truth and compared with a software named AutoMATiCA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Median Dice scores for BodySegAI against human ground truth were 0.969, 0.814, 0.986, and 0.990 for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT, respectively. The mean differences per slice for SM were −0.09 cm<sup>3</sup>, IMAT: −0.17 cm<sup>3</sup>, VAT: −0.12 cm<sup>3</sup>, and SAT: 0.67 cm<sup>3</sup>. Median absolute errors for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT were 1.35, 10.54, 0.91, and 1.07%, respectively. When analysing different anatomical levels separately, L3 and S1 demonstrated the overall highest and lowest Dice scores, respectively. On average, BodySegAI segmented 148 times faster than human readers (4.9 vs. 726.5 seconds, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Also, BodySegAI presented higher Dice scores for SM, IMAT, SAT, and VAT than AutoMATiCA (slices = 154).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>BodySegAI rapidly generates excellent segmentation of SM, VAT, and SAT and good segmentation of IMAT in L2 to S1 among colorectal cancer patients and may replace semi-manual segmentation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crt2.53\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

身体成分在结直肠癌患者中具有重要的临床意义,但由于耗时的人工分割,很少进行评估。我们开发并测试了BodySegAI,这是一款基于深度学习的软件,用于从常规获取的计算机断层扫描(CT)中自动量化身体成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Body composition assessment by artificial intelligence from routine computed tomography scans in colorectal cancer: Introducing BodySegAI

Body composition assessment by artificial intelligence from routine computed tomography scans in colorectal cancer: Introducing BodySegAI

Background

Body composition is of clinical importance in colorectal cancer patients, but is rarely assessed because of time-consuming manual segmentation. We developed and tested BodySegAI, a deep learning-based software for automated body composition quantification from routinely acquired computed tomography (CT) scans.

Methods

A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 2989 abdominal CT slices from L2 to S1 to segment skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intermuscular and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Human ground truth was established by combining segmentations from three human readers. BodySegAI was tested using 154 slices against the human ground truth and compared with a software named AutoMATiCA.

Results

Median Dice scores for BodySegAI against human ground truth were 0.969, 0.814, 0.986, and 0.990 for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT, respectively. The mean differences per slice for SM were −0.09 cm3, IMAT: −0.17 cm3, VAT: −0.12 cm3, and SAT: 0.67 cm3. Median absolute errors for SM, IMAT, VAT, and SAT were 1.35, 10.54, 0.91, and 1.07%, respectively. When analysing different anatomical levels separately, L3 and S1 demonstrated the overall highest and lowest Dice scores, respectively. On average, BodySegAI segmented 148 times faster than human readers (4.9 vs. 726.5 seconds, P < 0.001). Also, BodySegAI presented higher Dice scores for SM, IMAT, SAT, and VAT than AutoMATiCA (slices = 154).

Conclusions

BodySegAI rapidly generates excellent segmentation of SM, VAT, and SAT and good segmentation of IMAT in L2 to S1 among colorectal cancer patients and may replace semi-manual segmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信