用单词联想测验确定写作教育相关概念的认知结构

Esra Nur Ti̇ryaki
{"title":"用单词联想测验确定写作教育相关概念的认知结构","authors":"Esra Nur Ti̇ryaki","doi":"10.29329/epasr.2022.248.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods, to determine how prospective Turkish teachers explain the concepts in their minds about writing skills. The study group consists of 60 3rd-grade prospective teachers studying at the Department of Turkish Language Education of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University in the 2018-2019 academic year. Research data were collected through a word association test. In order to reach the concepts that best describe the writing skill, first of all, ten concepts were determined by the researcher within the scope of the relevant course. Then, the test prepared with these concepts was presented to the expert opinion, and the word association test was designed with the remaining six concepts (writing, text, text types, narrative text, informative text, and argumentative text). In the data analysis, the answers of the prospective teachers to the word test were examined in detail and independently with an expert to ensure reliability. Frequency distribution was created with the frequency of repetition of the concepts related to key concepts. According to the frequency of the concepts, the breakpoint technique (Bahar, Johnstone & Sutcliffe, 1999) was used. In this study, breakpoint points between 20 concepts and above, 15-19 concepts, 10-14 concepts, and 5-9 concepts were applied. Concept networks were created separately according to the pre-test and post-test. According to the data obtained, the concept in the pre-test (f =1.636) increased to (f=1.732) in the last test. While the least increase was observed in the “writing” key concept (f=299-302), the highest increase was found in the “text” concept (f=263-292). The number of sentences containing academic information about key concepts increased from pre-test to post-test (f=116; f=179). The number of sentences without academic information (f=189-f=115) decreased. Moreover, the decrease in sentences containing misconceptions (f=29-f=13) supports this situation. When the sentences were examined in terms of including scientific information, it was found that academic expressions were used more accurately, and misconceptions were reduced. A total of 16 words were added at this breakpoint: writing (class, thought, notebook), text (story, sentence, lettering), argumentative text (thesis, discussion), text types (novel, descriptive, essay, and article); narrative text (novel, child, and event), and informative text (objective, essay) concepts were produced. A common relationship was established in the concepts of essay, novel, and story.","PeriodicalId":30135,"journal":{"name":"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Cognitive Structures in Concepts Related to Writing Education With the Word Association Test\",\"authors\":\"Esra Nur Ti̇ryaki\",\"doi\":\"10.29329/epasr.2022.248.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods, to determine how prospective Turkish teachers explain the concepts in their minds about writing skills. The study group consists of 60 3rd-grade prospective teachers studying at the Department of Turkish Language Education of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University in the 2018-2019 academic year. Research data were collected through a word association test. In order to reach the concepts that best describe the writing skill, first of all, ten concepts were determined by the researcher within the scope of the relevant course. Then, the test prepared with these concepts was presented to the expert opinion, and the word association test was designed with the remaining six concepts (writing, text, text types, narrative text, informative text, and argumentative text). In the data analysis, the answers of the prospective teachers to the word test were examined in detail and independently with an expert to ensure reliability. Frequency distribution was created with the frequency of repetition of the concepts related to key concepts. According to the frequency of the concepts, the breakpoint technique (Bahar, Johnstone & Sutcliffe, 1999) was used. In this study, breakpoint points between 20 concepts and above, 15-19 concepts, 10-14 concepts, and 5-9 concepts were applied. Concept networks were created separately according to the pre-test and post-test. According to the data obtained, the concept in the pre-test (f =1.636) increased to (f=1.732) in the last test. While the least increase was observed in the “writing” key concept (f=299-302), the highest increase was found in the “text” concept (f=263-292). The number of sentences containing academic information about key concepts increased from pre-test to post-test (f=116; f=179). The number of sentences without academic information (f=189-f=115) decreased. Moreover, the decrease in sentences containing misconceptions (f=29-f=13) supports this situation. When the sentences were examined in terms of including scientific information, it was found that academic expressions were used more accurately, and misconceptions were reduced. A total of 16 words were added at this breakpoint: writing (class, thought, notebook), text (story, sentence, lettering), argumentative text (thesis, discussion), text types (novel, descriptive, essay, and article); narrative text (novel, child, and event), and informative text (objective, essay) concepts were produced. A common relationship was established in the concepts of essay, novel, and story.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.248.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.248.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是一项个案研究,是定性研究方法之一,旨在确定未来的土耳其教师如何解释他们心目中关于写作技能的概念。该研究小组由60名三年级准教师组成,他们于2018-2019学年在哈塔伊·穆斯塔法·凯末尔大学土耳其语教育系学习。研究数据是通过单词联想测试收集的。为了获得最能描述写作技巧的概念,首先,研究人员在相关课程的范围内确定了十个概念。然后,将用这些概念准备的测试提交给专家意见,并用剩下的六个概念(写作、文本、文本类型、叙事文本、信息文本和议论文)设计单词联想测试。在数据分析中,由专家对未来教师的单词测试答案进行了详细和独立的检查,以确保可靠性。频率分布是随着与关键概念相关的概念的重复频率而产生的。根据这些概念的频率,使用了断点技术(Bahar,Johnstone&Sutcliffe,1999)。在本研究中,应用了20个及以上概念、15-19个概念、10-14个概念和5-9个概念之间的断点。概念网络是根据测试前和测试后分别创建的。根据获得的数据,预测试中的概念(f=1.636)增加到上次测试中的(f=1.732)。虽然在“写作”关键概念中观察到的增长最小(f=299-302),但在“文本”概念中发现的增长最高(f=263-292)。从测试前到测试后,包含关键概念学术信息的句子数量有所增加(f=116;f=179)。没有学术信息的句子数量(f=189-f=115)减少。此外,含有误解的句子的减少(f=29-f=13)支持了这种情况。当从包含科学信息的角度对这些句子进行检查时,发现学术表达的使用更准确,误解也减少了。在这个断点处总共添加了16个单词:写作(课堂、思想、笔记本)、文本(故事、句子、字母)、议论文(论文、讨论)、文本类型(小说、描述性、随笔和文章);产生了叙事文本(小说、儿童和事件)和信息文本(客观、散文)概念。散文、小说和故事的概念之间建立了一种共同的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Cognitive Structures in Concepts Related to Writing Education With the Word Association Test
This research was conducted as a case study, which is one of the qualitative research methods, to determine how prospective Turkish teachers explain the concepts in their minds about writing skills. The study group consists of 60 3rd-grade prospective teachers studying at the Department of Turkish Language Education of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University in the 2018-2019 academic year. Research data were collected through a word association test. In order to reach the concepts that best describe the writing skill, first of all, ten concepts were determined by the researcher within the scope of the relevant course. Then, the test prepared with these concepts was presented to the expert opinion, and the word association test was designed with the remaining six concepts (writing, text, text types, narrative text, informative text, and argumentative text). In the data analysis, the answers of the prospective teachers to the word test were examined in detail and independently with an expert to ensure reliability. Frequency distribution was created with the frequency of repetition of the concepts related to key concepts. According to the frequency of the concepts, the breakpoint technique (Bahar, Johnstone & Sutcliffe, 1999) was used. In this study, breakpoint points between 20 concepts and above, 15-19 concepts, 10-14 concepts, and 5-9 concepts were applied. Concept networks were created separately according to the pre-test and post-test. According to the data obtained, the concept in the pre-test (f =1.636) increased to (f=1.732) in the last test. While the least increase was observed in the “writing” key concept (f=299-302), the highest increase was found in the “text” concept (f=263-292). The number of sentences containing academic information about key concepts increased from pre-test to post-test (f=116; f=179). The number of sentences without academic information (f=189-f=115) decreased. Moreover, the decrease in sentences containing misconceptions (f=29-f=13) supports this situation. When the sentences were examined in terms of including scientific information, it was found that academic expressions were used more accurately, and misconceptions were reduced. A total of 16 words were added at this breakpoint: writing (class, thought, notebook), text (story, sentence, lettering), argumentative text (thesis, discussion), text types (novel, descriptive, essay, and article); narrative text (novel, child, and event), and informative text (objective, essay) concepts were produced. A common relationship was established in the concepts of essay, novel, and story.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信