超越概念：德里达和莱维纳斯的隐喻

IF 0.2 3区哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY

FILOZOFIA Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5

Alžbeta Kuchtová

{"title":"超越概念：德里达和莱维纳斯的隐喻","authors":"Alžbeta Kuchtová","doi":"10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to examine Levinas’s and Derrida’s concept of metaphor. The paper compares their account on metaphor that shows well their position toward religion. Both authors agree that metaphor is connected to the realm of “beyond concept” but Levinas identifies the metaphor, in Carnets de Captiv-ité , with monotheistic divinity. Derrida does not. The conclusion is that Derrida cannot be considered negative theologian nor religious thinker.","PeriodicalId":44340,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Concept: Derrida and Levinas on Metaphor\",\"authors\":\"Alžbeta Kuchtová\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to examine Levinas’s and Derrida’s concept of metaphor. The paper compares their account on metaphor that shows well their position toward religion. Both authors agree that metaphor is connected to the realm of “beyond concept” but Levinas identifies the metaphor, in Carnets de Captiv-ité , with monotheistic divinity. Derrida does not. The conclusion is that Derrida cannot be considered negative theologian nor religious thinker.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILOZOFIA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILOZOFIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILOZOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是考察列维纳斯和德里达的隐喻概念。本文比较了他们对隐喻的描述，很好地说明了他们对宗教的立场。两位作者都认为隐喻与“超越概念”的领域有关，但列维纳斯在《Carnets de captiva - it》中将隐喻与一神论的神性联系在一起。德里达没有。结论是，德里达不能被认为是消极的神学家，也不能被认为是宗教思想家。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond Concept: Derrida and Levinas on Metaphor

The aim of this paper is to examine Levinas’s and Derrida’s concept of metaphor. The paper compares their account on metaphor that shows well their position toward religion. Both authors agree that metaphor is connected to the realm of “beyond concept” but Levinas identifies the metaphor, in Carnets de Captiv-ité , with monotheistic divinity. Derrida does not. The conclusion is that Derrida cannot be considered negative theologian nor religious thinker.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

FILOZOFIA PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

66.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Filozofia publishes original articles in a wide range of areas including metaphysics, epistemology, history of philosophy, social and political philosophy, philosophy of mind, ethics, philosophy of religion and related disciplines. The journal is published monthly, with the exception of July and August, i.e. ten issues yearly. The articles are accepted in Slovak, Czech and English languages.