除草剂对白三叶草(Trifolium repens L.)侵染草坪传粉者觅食行为和花形态的影响

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Navdeep Godara, C. Williamson, Daewon Koo, S. Askew
{"title":"除草剂对白三叶草(Trifolium repens L.)侵染草坪传粉者觅食行为和花形态的影响","authors":"Navdeep Godara, C. Williamson, Daewon Koo, S. Askew","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The recent decline in pollinator abundance is a cause of concern for sustaining global food production. Several common weeds of managed turfgrass systems attract honeybees and other wild pollinators. As turfgrass often requires treatment with insecticides that harm bees, best practices are needed to prevent bees from visiting weed-infested turf areas that will be treated for insect pests. Weed control tactics can protect pollinator exposure to insecticides by reducing the floral resources afforded to bees from turfgrass weeds. Three field studies were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effect of various herbicides and herbicide formulation constituents on pollinator foraging and white clover floral morphology in managed tall fescue turfgrass. Treatments included a nontreated control; MCPP; 2,4-D; dicamba; Trimec Classic™ (2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); Speedzone™ (carfentrazone, 2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); and an herbicide-formulation constituent (inert ingredients of Speedzone™). All response variables were evaluated for 8 d, starting from one day before treatment and ending 6 d after treatment (DAT). The herbicide formulation constituent did not alter white clover flower density, floral discoloration, floral quality, or insect visitation compared to nontreated plots. Herbicides reduced flower density and floral quality to the same extent, but MCPP discolored white clover floral tissue 16% per day and less than all other herbicides except dicamba. Floral quality completely declined in approximately 5 d following any herbicide treatment. Bee visitation to white clover–infested turf increased by 3 bees min–1 for every 100 white clover blooms m–2. Honeybees and other insects vacated herbicide-treated areas in less than 2 d, despite minimal effects on floral quality and density at that time. The data suggest that practitioners could apply insecticides 2 d after auxin herbicide treatment and avoid harm to pollinators, but additional work is needed to directly measure pollinator exposure following such treatments. Nomenclature: Carfentrazone; dicamba; MCPP; 2,4-D; white clover, Trifolium repens L.; tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea; honeybee, Apis mellifera L.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":"37 1","pages":"221 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of herbicides on pollinator foraging behavior and flower morphology in white clover (Trifolium repens L.)–infested turfgrass\",\"authors\":\"Navdeep Godara, C. Williamson, Daewon Koo, S. Askew\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2023.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The recent decline in pollinator abundance is a cause of concern for sustaining global food production. Several common weeds of managed turfgrass systems attract honeybees and other wild pollinators. As turfgrass often requires treatment with insecticides that harm bees, best practices are needed to prevent bees from visiting weed-infested turf areas that will be treated for insect pests. Weed control tactics can protect pollinator exposure to insecticides by reducing the floral resources afforded to bees from turfgrass weeds. Three field studies were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effect of various herbicides and herbicide formulation constituents on pollinator foraging and white clover floral morphology in managed tall fescue turfgrass. Treatments included a nontreated control; MCPP; 2,4-D; dicamba; Trimec Classic™ (2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); Speedzone™ (carfentrazone, 2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); and an herbicide-formulation constituent (inert ingredients of Speedzone™). All response variables were evaluated for 8 d, starting from one day before treatment and ending 6 d after treatment (DAT). The herbicide formulation constituent did not alter white clover flower density, floral discoloration, floral quality, or insect visitation compared to nontreated plots. Herbicides reduced flower density and floral quality to the same extent, but MCPP discolored white clover floral tissue 16% per day and less than all other herbicides except dicamba. Floral quality completely declined in approximately 5 d following any herbicide treatment. Bee visitation to white clover–infested turf increased by 3 bees min–1 for every 100 white clover blooms m–2. Honeybees and other insects vacated herbicide-treated areas in less than 2 d, despite minimal effects on floral quality and density at that time. The data suggest that practitioners could apply insecticides 2 d after auxin herbicide treatment and avoid harm to pollinators, but additional work is needed to directly measure pollinator exposure following such treatments. Nomenclature: Carfentrazone; dicamba; MCPP; 2,4-D; white clover, Trifolium repens L.; tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea; honeybee, Apis mellifera L.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.33\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.33","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要最近传粉昆虫数量的下降是维持全球粮食生产的一个令人担忧的原因。管理草坪草系统中的几种常见杂草吸引了蜜蜂和其他野生传粉昆虫。由于草坪草通常需要使用危害蜜蜂的杀虫剂进行处理,因此需要采取最佳做法来防止蜜蜂进入杂草丛生的草坪区域,这些区域将进行害虫处理。杂草控制策略可以通过减少草坪杂草为蜜蜂提供的花卉资源来保护传粉昆虫接触杀虫剂。2021年和2022年进行了三项实地研究,以评估各种除草剂和除草剂配方成分对管理的高羊茅草坪中传粉昆虫觅食和白三叶草花朵形态的影响。治疗包括非治疗对照;MCPP;2,4-D;麦草畏;Trimec经典™ (2,4-D、MCPP、麦草畏);Speedbone™ (卡芬曲宗、2,4-D、MCPP、麦草畏);和除草剂配方成分(Speedzone的惰性成分™). 从治疗前一天开始至治疗后6天结束,对所有反应变量进行为期8天的评估(DAT)。与未处理的地块相比,除草剂配方成分不会改变白三叶草的花朵密度、花朵变色、花朵质量或昆虫造访。除草剂在相同程度上降低了花密度和花质量,但MCPP使白三叶草花组织每天变色16%,比除麦草畏外的所有其他除草剂都要少。经过任何除草剂处理后,花的质量在大约5天内完全下降。每100朵白三叶草开花m-2,蜜蜂对白三叶草侵扰的草坪的访问量就会增加3只蜜蜂min-1。蜜蜂和其他昆虫在不到2天的时间内就离开了经过除草剂处理的区域,尽管当时对花朵质量和密度的影响很小。数据表明,从业者可以在生长素除草剂处理后2天使用杀虫剂,避免对传粉昆虫造成伤害,但还需要额外的工作来直接测量此类处理后传粉昆虫的暴露情况。命名法:Carfentrazone;麦草畏;MCPP;2,4-D;白三叶草。;高羊茅,高羊茅;蜜蜂,Apis mellifera L。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of herbicides on pollinator foraging behavior and flower morphology in white clover (Trifolium repens L.)–infested turfgrass
Abstract The recent decline in pollinator abundance is a cause of concern for sustaining global food production. Several common weeds of managed turfgrass systems attract honeybees and other wild pollinators. As turfgrass often requires treatment with insecticides that harm bees, best practices are needed to prevent bees from visiting weed-infested turf areas that will be treated for insect pests. Weed control tactics can protect pollinator exposure to insecticides by reducing the floral resources afforded to bees from turfgrass weeds. Three field studies were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate the effect of various herbicides and herbicide formulation constituents on pollinator foraging and white clover floral morphology in managed tall fescue turfgrass. Treatments included a nontreated control; MCPP; 2,4-D; dicamba; Trimec Classic™ (2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); Speedzone™ (carfentrazone, 2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba); and an herbicide-formulation constituent (inert ingredients of Speedzone™). All response variables were evaluated for 8 d, starting from one day before treatment and ending 6 d after treatment (DAT). The herbicide formulation constituent did not alter white clover flower density, floral discoloration, floral quality, or insect visitation compared to nontreated plots. Herbicides reduced flower density and floral quality to the same extent, but MCPP discolored white clover floral tissue 16% per day and less than all other herbicides except dicamba. Floral quality completely declined in approximately 5 d following any herbicide treatment. Bee visitation to white clover–infested turf increased by 3 bees min–1 for every 100 white clover blooms m–2. Honeybees and other insects vacated herbicide-treated areas in less than 2 d, despite minimal effects on floral quality and density at that time. The data suggest that practitioners could apply insecticides 2 d after auxin herbicide treatment and avoid harm to pollinators, but additional work is needed to directly measure pollinator exposure following such treatments. Nomenclature: Carfentrazone; dicamba; MCPP; 2,4-D; white clover, Trifolium repens L.; tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea; honeybee, Apis mellifera L.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信