费多托娃等人诉俄罗斯:欧洲LGBTQ家庭新时代的曙光?

Q2 Social Sciences
Nausica Palazzo
{"title":"费多托娃等人诉俄罗斯:欧洲LGBTQ家庭新时代的曙光?","authors":"Nausica Palazzo","doi":"10.1177/1023263X231195455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment of the Grand Chamber in the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia has recognized the right to legalized same-sex unions under the Convention, thereby significantly impacting LGBTQ rights throughout Europe. However, this decision also presents intricate challenges concerning the Court's legitimacy, and resilience amidst the prevailing culture wars on LGBTQ rights. Following an introduction to the factual background of the case, the note proceeds to analyse the Court's judgment. Section 4 critically evaluates the judgment and examines its extensive implications on geopolitical affairs and the ongoing culture wars. Finally, section 5 provides a concluding statement.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"216 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fedotova and Others v. Russia: Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families?\",\"authors\":\"Nausica Palazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1023263X231195455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The judgment of the Grand Chamber in the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia has recognized the right to legalized same-sex unions under the Convention, thereby significantly impacting LGBTQ rights throughout Europe. However, this decision also presents intricate challenges concerning the Court's legitimacy, and resilience amidst the prevailing culture wars on LGBTQ rights. Following an introduction to the factual background of the case, the note proceeds to analyse the Court's judgment. Section 4 critically evaluates the judgment and examines its extensive implications on geopolitical affairs and the ongoing culture wars. Finally, section 5 provides a concluding statement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"216 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231195455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231195455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Fedotova等人诉俄罗斯一案中,大法庭的判决承认了《公约》规定的同性婚姻合法化的权利,从而对整个欧洲的LGBTQ权利产生了重大影响。然而,这一决定也提出了复杂的挑战,涉及法院的合法性,以及在针对LGBTQ权利的主流文化战争中的适应性。在介绍案件的事实背景之后,本说明接着分析法院的判决。第4节批判性地评估了这一判断,并考察了其对地缘政治事务和正在进行的文化战争的广泛影响。最后,第5节是结束语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fedotova and Others v. Russia: Dawn of a new era for European LGBTQ families?
The judgment of the Grand Chamber in the case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia has recognized the right to legalized same-sex unions under the Convention, thereby significantly impacting LGBTQ rights throughout Europe. However, this decision also presents intricate challenges concerning the Court's legitimacy, and resilience amidst the prevailing culture wars on LGBTQ rights. Following an introduction to the factual background of the case, the note proceeds to analyse the Court's judgment. Section 4 critically evaluates the judgment and examines its extensive implications on geopolitical affairs and the ongoing culture wars. Finally, section 5 provides a concluding statement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信