英格兰银行300年来的利润:战争、金融危机和分配

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Financial History Review Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1017/S0968565022000038

M. Anson, Forrest H. Capie

{"title":"英格兰银行300年来的利润:战争、金融危机和分配","authors":"M. Anson, Forrest H. Capie","doi":"10.1017/S0968565022000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have produced a series on the Bank of England's profits from its foundation in 1694 to the present time. This has not been available before. We explain the path of these profits over more than 300 years and account for their changing pattern. We next examine from where the profits derived, first in ‘normal times’, and then seeking, in particular, the impact of wars and financial crises. Other questions are: how much derived from seignorage; to what extent were profits passively acquired? Finally, we examine what the distribution regime was, and if, and how, that changed. This becomes more interesting in the period after nationalisation with some surprising results.","PeriodicalId":44063,"journal":{"name":"Financial History Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"98 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bank of England's profits across 300 years: wars, financial crises and distribution\",\"authors\":\"M. Anson, Forrest H. Capie\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0968565022000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have produced a series on the Bank of England's profits from its foundation in 1694 to the present time. This has not been available before. We explain the path of these profits over more than 300 years and account for their changing pattern. We next examine from where the profits derived, first in ‘normal times’, and then seeking, in particular, the impact of wars and financial crises. Other questions are: how much derived from seignorage; to what extent were profits passively acquired? Finally, we examine what the distribution regime was, and if, and how, that changed. This becomes more interesting in the period after nationalisation with some surprising results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial History Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"98 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0968565022000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0968565022000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们制作了一系列关于英格兰银行从1694年成立到现在的利润。这在以前是不可用的。我们解释了300多年来这些利润的路径，并解释了它们不断变化的模式。接下来，我们将研究利润的来源，首先是在“正常时期”，然后特别是战争和金融危机的影响。其他的问题是：有多少是从铸币税中获得的；被动获取利润的程度如何？最后，我们研究了分配制度是什么，以及这种制度是否以及如何改变。这在国有化后的时期变得更加有趣，并带来了一些令人惊讶的结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Bank of England's profits across 300 years: wars, financial crises and distribution

We have produced a series on the Bank of England's profits from its foundation in 1694 to the present time. This has not been available before. We explain the path of these profits over more than 300 years and account for their changing pattern. We next examine from where the profits derived, first in ‘normal times’, and then seeking, in particular, the impact of wars and financial crises. Other questions are: how much derived from seignorage; to what extent were profits passively acquired? Finally, we examine what the distribution regime was, and if, and how, that changed. This becomes more interesting in the period after nationalisation with some surprising results.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Financial History Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Financial History Review is the international forum for all scholars with interests in the development of banking, finance, and monetary matters. Its editors deliberately seek to embrace the broadest approach to publishing research findings within this growing historical specialism. Articles address all aspects of financial and monetary history, including technical and theoretical approaches, those derived from cultural and social perspectives and the interrelations between politics and finance. These presentations of current research are complemented by somewhat shorter pieces, specifically conceived as aids to research. Each issue contains a substantial review section, and every complete volume contains an annual bibliography.