歌唱卡秋莎:托尔斯泰在1910年代韩国的复活

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
S. Lim
{"title":"歌唱卡秋莎:托尔斯泰在1910年代韩国的复活","authors":"S. Lim","doi":"10.1215/21581665-7258068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the remarkable success of the Russian writer Leo Tolstoy's last novel, Resurrection (1899), in early colonial Korea of the 1910s. In answering the main question of the significance of Resurrection in Korea's colonial modernity, I argue that it is necessary to consider the interplay of the elite and popular receptions of Tolstoy's novel, as well as to place the various Korean versions of Resurrection within the broader context of early colonial rule, the development of modern colonial media and mass culture, the specificities of the cultural terrain of the 1910s, and intellectuals' search for a modern national literature. Resurrection was introduced in Korea at a critical early period when various narrative forms and cultural media coexisted and vied with each other for influence, and when—prior to the appearance of Yi Kwangsu's Mujŏng—literature was far from enjoying a privileged place in modern Korean culture. As such, an examination of its reception can provide important insights into the dynamics governing the emergence of the modern novel at the dawn of the colonial period in its interaction with popular culture and modern media.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"125 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singing Katiusha: Tolstoy's Resurrection in 1910s Korea\",\"authors\":\"S. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/21581665-7258068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines the remarkable success of the Russian writer Leo Tolstoy's last novel, Resurrection (1899), in early colonial Korea of the 1910s. In answering the main question of the significance of Resurrection in Korea's colonial modernity, I argue that it is necessary to consider the interplay of the elite and popular receptions of Tolstoy's novel, as well as to place the various Korean versions of Resurrection within the broader context of early colonial rule, the development of modern colonial media and mass culture, the specificities of the cultural terrain of the 1910s, and intellectuals' search for a modern national literature. Resurrection was introduced in Korea at a critical early period when various narrative forms and cultural media coexisted and vied with each other for influence, and when—prior to the appearance of Yi Kwangsu's Mujŏng—literature was far from enjoying a privileged place in modern Korean culture. As such, an examination of its reception can provide important insights into the dynamics governing the emergence of the modern novel at the dawn of the colonial period in its interaction with popular culture and modern media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了俄国作家列夫·托尔斯泰的最后一部小说《复活》(1899)在20世纪10年代早期殖民时期的朝鲜取得的巨大成功。在回答《复活》在韩国殖民现代性中的重要意义这一主要问题时,我认为有必要考虑精英和大众对托尔斯泰小说的接受之间的相互作用,并将《复活》的各种韩国版本置于早期殖民统治、现代殖民媒体和大众文化的发展、20世纪10年代文化地形的特殊性以及知识分子对现代民族文学的追求等更广泛的背景下。《复活》是在各种叙事形式和文化媒介共存、相互争夺影响力的早期关键时期传入韩国的,在李光洙的《Mujŏng-literature》出现之前,它在韩国现代文化中还远未享有特权。因此,对其接受程度的考察可以提供重要的见解,以了解殖民时期初期现代小说与流行文化和现代媒体的互动中,现代小说出现的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Singing Katiusha: Tolstoy's Resurrection in 1910s Korea
Abstract:This article examines the remarkable success of the Russian writer Leo Tolstoy's last novel, Resurrection (1899), in early colonial Korea of the 1910s. In answering the main question of the significance of Resurrection in Korea's colonial modernity, I argue that it is necessary to consider the interplay of the elite and popular receptions of Tolstoy's novel, as well as to place the various Korean versions of Resurrection within the broader context of early colonial rule, the development of modern colonial media and mass culture, the specificities of the cultural terrain of the 1910s, and intellectuals' search for a modern national literature. Resurrection was introduced in Korea at a critical early period when various narrative forms and cultural media coexisted and vied with each other for influence, and when—prior to the appearance of Yi Kwangsu's Mujŏng—literature was far from enjoying a privileged place in modern Korean culture. As such, an examination of its reception can provide important insights into the dynamics governing the emergence of the modern novel at the dawn of the colonial period in its interaction with popular culture and modern media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信