社区大学需要拆除“标准”语言意识形态:对写作和读写教师态度的分析

Q2 Social Sciences
R. Lawton, Christa de Kleine
{"title":"社区大学需要拆除“标准”语言意识形态:对写作和读写教师态度的分析","authors":"R. Lawton, Christa de Kleine","doi":"10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In spite of years of sociolinguistic research establishing that all language varieties are valid and equal, there is a disconnect between this knowledge and pedagogical practices at the college level. Certain Englishes, particularly those of minoritized speakers, are stigmatized, and “standard” English is upheld as the goal of writing and literacy instruction. To better understand this disconnect, we conducted a study to examine writing and literacy instructors’ attitudes toward “standard” and “nonstandard” Englishes in the community college setting. Employing a critical discursive approach to analyze language ideologies, we discovered that instructors held beliefs that were deeply rooted in standard language ideology, including attitudes toward nonstandard Englishes that superficially expressed tolerance but which underlyingly revealed rejection through lack of appreciation and validation. We argue that professional development that focuses on developing critical language awareness is needed for instructors, which—crucially—must begin with increasing awareness of the language ideologies that govern our beliefs, as these ideologies ultimately discriminate against speakers of stigmatized languages.","PeriodicalId":37761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Reading and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Need to Dismantle “Standard” Language Ideology at the Community College: An Analysis of Writing and Literacy Instructor Attitudes\",\"authors\":\"R. Lawton, Christa de Kleine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In spite of years of sociolinguistic research establishing that all language varieties are valid and equal, there is a disconnect between this knowledge and pedagogical practices at the college level. Certain Englishes, particularly those of minoritized speakers, are stigmatized, and “standard” English is upheld as the goal of writing and literacy instruction. To better understand this disconnect, we conducted a study to examine writing and literacy instructors’ attitudes toward “standard” and “nonstandard” Englishes in the community college setting. Employing a critical discursive approach to analyze language ideologies, we discovered that instructors held beliefs that were deeply rooted in standard language ideology, including attitudes toward nonstandard Englishes that superficially expressed tolerance but which underlyingly revealed rejection through lack of appreciation and validation. We argue that professional development that focuses on developing critical language awareness is needed for instructors, which—crucially—must begin with increasing awareness of the language ideologies that govern our beliefs, as these ideologies ultimately discriminate against speakers of stigmatized languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Reading and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Reading and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Reading and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1836938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要尽管多年的社会语言学研究表明,所有语言变体都是有效和平等的,但这一知识与大学教育实践之间存在脱节。某些英语,特别是少数民族的英语,被污名化,“标准”英语被视为写作和识字教学的目标。为了更好地理解这种脱节,我们进行了一项研究,考察了社区大学环境中写作和识字教师对“标准”和“非标准”英语的态度。采用批判性话语的方法来分析语言意识形态,我们发现教师的信念深深植根于标准语言意识形态,包括对非标准英语的态度,这些态度表面上表达了宽容,但背后却因缺乏欣赏和认可而表现出拒绝。我们认为,教师需要专注于培养批判性语言意识的专业发展,这一点至关重要,必须从提高对支配我们信仰的语言意识形态的认识开始,因为这些意识形态最终会歧视使用污名化语言的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Need to Dismantle “Standard” Language Ideology at the Community College: An Analysis of Writing and Literacy Instructor Attitudes
ABSTRACT In spite of years of sociolinguistic research establishing that all language varieties are valid and equal, there is a disconnect between this knowledge and pedagogical practices at the college level. Certain Englishes, particularly those of minoritized speakers, are stigmatized, and “standard” English is upheld as the goal of writing and literacy instruction. To better understand this disconnect, we conducted a study to examine writing and literacy instructors’ attitudes toward “standard” and “nonstandard” Englishes in the community college setting. Employing a critical discursive approach to analyze language ideologies, we discovered that instructors held beliefs that were deeply rooted in standard language ideology, including attitudes toward nonstandard Englishes that superficially expressed tolerance but which underlyingly revealed rejection through lack of appreciation and validation. We argue that professional development that focuses on developing critical language awareness is needed for instructors, which—crucially—must begin with increasing awareness of the language ideologies that govern our beliefs, as these ideologies ultimately discriminate against speakers of stigmatized languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of College Reading and Learning
Journal of College Reading and Learning Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of College Reading and Learning (JCRL) invites authors to submit their scholarly research for publication. JCRL is an international forum for the publication of high-quality articles on theory, research, and policy related to areas of developmental education, postsecondary literacy instruction, and learning assistance at the postsecondary level. JCRL is published triannually in the spring, summer, and fall for the College Reading and Learning Association (CRLA). In addition to publishing investigations of the reading, writing, thinking, and studying of college learners, JCRL seeks manuscripts with a college focus on the following topics: effective teaching for struggling learners, learning through new technologies and texts, learning support for culturally and linguistically diverse student populations, and program evaluations of developmental and learning assistance instructional models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信