多重监管与会计重述:来自加拿大的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Brian M. Burnett, D. Hart, B. Jorgensen, Gregory W. Martin
{"title":"多重监管与会计重述:来自加拿大的证据","authors":"Brian M. Burnett, D. Hart, B. Jorgensen, Gregory W. Martin","doi":"10.2308/JIAR-52494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Canada delegates securities regulation to the provincial securities regulators where each Canadian firm is headquartered. Legal origin theories predict weaker enforcement due to less emphasis on accounting in civil law jurisdictions, like Quebec. Consistent with these theories, we find fewer restatements for non-U.S. cross-listed firms headquartered in Quebec relative to the rest of Canada (ROC), which has a common law legal origin. When subject to two securities regulators—a Canadian provincial securities regulator and the Securities and Exchange Commission—Quebec firms cross-listed in the U.S. restate at a rate similar to the ROC. Finally, we document that Canadian firms restate less frequently after adopting IFRS, consistent with more principles-based standards being more difficult to enforce ex post than more rules-based standards.","PeriodicalId":45457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Accounting Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Regulators and Accounting Restatements: Evidence from Canada\",\"authors\":\"Brian M. Burnett, D. Hart, B. Jorgensen, Gregory W. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/JIAR-52494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Canada delegates securities regulation to the provincial securities regulators where each Canadian firm is headquartered. Legal origin theories predict weaker enforcement due to less emphasis on accounting in civil law jurisdictions, like Quebec. Consistent with these theories, we find fewer restatements for non-U.S. cross-listed firms headquartered in Quebec relative to the rest of Canada (ROC), which has a common law legal origin. When subject to two securities regulators—a Canadian provincial securities regulator and the Securities and Exchange Commission—Quebec firms cross-listed in the U.S. restate at a rate similar to the ROC. Finally, we document that Canadian firms restate less frequently after adopting IFRS, consistent with more principles-based standards being more difficult to enforce ex post than more rules-based standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-52494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-52494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

加拿大将证券监管委托给各加拿大公司总部所在的省级证券监管机构。法律起源理论预测,由于民法司法管辖区(如魁北克)对会计的重视程度较低,执法力度较弱。与这些理论一致的是,我们发现非美国人的重述较少。与加拿大其他地区相比,总部设在魁北克的交叉上市公司(ROC)具有普通法的法律渊源。当受到两个证券监管机构——加拿大省级证券监管机构和证券交易委员会——的约束时,魁北克公司在美国交叉上市的重述率与中华民国相似。最后,我们记录了加拿大公司在采用国际财务报告准则后重申的频率较低,这与更多基于原则的准则比更多基于规则的准则更难事后执行相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple Regulators and Accounting Restatements: Evidence from Canada
Canada delegates securities regulation to the provincial securities regulators where each Canadian firm is headquartered. Legal origin theories predict weaker enforcement due to less emphasis on accounting in civil law jurisdictions, like Quebec. Consistent with these theories, we find fewer restatements for non-U.S. cross-listed firms headquartered in Quebec relative to the rest of Canada (ROC), which has a common law legal origin. When subject to two securities regulators—a Canadian provincial securities regulator and the Securities and Exchange Commission—Quebec firms cross-listed in the U.S. restate at a rate similar to the ROC. Finally, we document that Canadian firms restate less frequently after adopting IFRS, consistent with more principles-based standards being more difficult to enforce ex post than more rules-based standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信