干旱和紧急干旱屏障对加利福尼亚三角洲生态系统的影响

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
W. Kimmerer, F. Wilkerson, B. Downing, R. Dugdale, E. Gross, Karen R. Kayfetz, S. Khanna, A. Parker, Janet K. Thompson
{"title":"干旱和紧急干旱屏障对加利福尼亚三角洲生态系统的影响","authors":"W. Kimmerer, F. Wilkerson, B. Downing, R. Dugdale, E. Gross, Karen R. Kayfetz, S. Khanna, A. Parker, Janet K. Thompson","doi":"10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Kimmerer, Wim; Wilkerson, Frances; Downing, Bryan; Dugdale, Richard; Gross, Edward S.; Kayfetz, Karen; Khanna, Shruti; Parker, Alexander E.; Thompson, Janet | Abstract: In 2015, the fourth year of the recent drought, the California Department of Water Resources installed a rock barrier across False River west of Franks Tract to limit salt intrusion into the Delta at minimal cost in freshwater. This Barrier blocked flow in False River, greatly reducing landward salt transport by decreasing tidal dispersion in Franks Tract. We investigated some ecological consequences of the Barrier, examining its effects on water circulation and exchange, on distributions of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and bivalves, and on phytoplankton and zooplankton. The Barrier allowed SAV to spread to areas of Franks Tract that previously had been clear. The distributions of bivalves (Potamocorbula and Corbicula) responded to the changes in salinity at time–scales of months for newly settled individuals, to 1 or more years for adults, but the Barrier’s effect was confounded with that of the drought. Nutrients, phytoplankton biomass, and a Microcystis abundance index showed little response to the Barrier. Transport of copepods — determined using output from a particle-tracking model — indicated some intermediate-scale reduction with the Barrier in place, but monitoring data did not show a larger-scale response in abundance. These studies were conducted separately and synthesized after the fact, and relied on reference conditions that were not always suitable for identifying the Barrier’s effects. If barriers are considered in the future, we rcommend a modest program of investigation to replicate study elements, and to ensure suitable reference conditions are available to allow barrier effects to be distinguished unambiguously from other sources of variability.","PeriodicalId":38364,"journal":{"name":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Drought and the Emergency Drought Barrier on the Ecosystem of the California Delta\",\"authors\":\"W. Kimmerer, F. Wilkerson, B. Downing, R. Dugdale, E. Gross, Karen R. Kayfetz, S. Khanna, A. Parker, Janet K. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Kimmerer, Wim; Wilkerson, Frances; Downing, Bryan; Dugdale, Richard; Gross, Edward S.; Kayfetz, Karen; Khanna, Shruti; Parker, Alexander E.; Thompson, Janet | Abstract: In 2015, the fourth year of the recent drought, the California Department of Water Resources installed a rock barrier across False River west of Franks Tract to limit salt intrusion into the Delta at minimal cost in freshwater. This Barrier blocked flow in False River, greatly reducing landward salt transport by decreasing tidal dispersion in Franks Tract. We investigated some ecological consequences of the Barrier, examining its effects on water circulation and exchange, on distributions of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and bivalves, and on phytoplankton and zooplankton. The Barrier allowed SAV to spread to areas of Franks Tract that previously had been clear. The distributions of bivalves (Potamocorbula and Corbicula) responded to the changes in salinity at time–scales of months for newly settled individuals, to 1 or more years for adults, but the Barrier’s effect was confounded with that of the drought. Nutrients, phytoplankton biomass, and a Microcystis abundance index showed little response to the Barrier. Transport of copepods — determined using output from a particle-tracking model — indicated some intermediate-scale reduction with the Barrier in place, but monitoring data did not show a larger-scale response in abundance. These studies were conducted separately and synthesized after the fact, and relied on reference conditions that were not always suitable for identifying the Barrier’s effects. If barriers are considered in the future, we rcommend a modest program of investigation to replicate study elements, and to ensure suitable reference conditions are available to allow barrier effects to be distinguished unambiguously from other sources of variability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2019v17iss3art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

作者:Kimmerer,Wim;弗朗西丝·威尔克森;唐宁,布莱恩;Richard Dugdale;Gross,Edward S。;Kayfetz,Karen;Khanna,Shruti;亚历山大·E·帕克。;Thompson,Janet |摘要:2015年,也就是最近干旱的第四年,加州水利部在弗兰克斯区以西的福斯河上安装了一道岩石屏障,以最低的淡水成本限制盐入侵三角洲。该屏障阻断了False河的水流,通过减少Franks区的潮汐分散,大大减少了向陆地的盐输送。我们调查了屏障的一些生态后果,研究了它对水循环和交换、水下水生植被(SAV)和双壳类的分布以及浮游植物和浮游动物的影响。隔离墙使SAV能够传播到弗兰克斯区以前已经清除的地区。双壳类(Potamocorbula和Corbicula)的分布对盐度随时间的变化做出了反应——新定居个体为数月,成年个体为1年或更长时间,但屏障的影响与干旱的影响相混淆。营养物质、浮游植物生物量和微囊藻丰度指数对屏障反应不大。桡足类的运输——使用粒子跟踪模型的输出来确定——表明在屏障到位的情况下,桡足类有一些中等规模的减少,但监测数据并没有显示出更大规模的丰度响应。这些研究是单独进行的,并在事后进行合成,并且依赖于并不总是适合识别屏障效应的参考条件。如果未来考虑屏障,我们将制定一个适度的调查计划,以复制研究元素,并确保提供合适的参考条件,从而将屏障效应与其他变异源明确区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Drought and the Emergency Drought Barrier on the Ecosystem of the California Delta
Author(s): Kimmerer, Wim; Wilkerson, Frances; Downing, Bryan; Dugdale, Richard; Gross, Edward S.; Kayfetz, Karen; Khanna, Shruti; Parker, Alexander E.; Thompson, Janet | Abstract: In 2015, the fourth year of the recent drought, the California Department of Water Resources installed a rock barrier across False River west of Franks Tract to limit salt intrusion into the Delta at minimal cost in freshwater. This Barrier blocked flow in False River, greatly reducing landward salt transport by decreasing tidal dispersion in Franks Tract. We investigated some ecological consequences of the Barrier, examining its effects on water circulation and exchange, on distributions of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and bivalves, and on phytoplankton and zooplankton. The Barrier allowed SAV to spread to areas of Franks Tract that previously had been clear. The distributions of bivalves (Potamocorbula and Corbicula) responded to the changes in salinity at time–scales of months for newly settled individuals, to 1 or more years for adults, but the Barrier’s effect was confounded with that of the drought. Nutrients, phytoplankton biomass, and a Microcystis abundance index showed little response to the Barrier. Transport of copepods — determined using output from a particle-tracking model — indicated some intermediate-scale reduction with the Barrier in place, but monitoring data did not show a larger-scale response in abundance. These studies were conducted separately and synthesized after the fact, and relied on reference conditions that were not always suitable for identifying the Barrier’s effects. If barriers are considered in the future, we rcommend a modest program of investigation to replicate study elements, and to ensure suitable reference conditions are available to allow barrier effects to be distinguished unambiguously from other sources of variability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信