主题部分:公元121-122年间哈德良在西北各省的统治

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
P. Bidwell
{"title":"主题部分:公元121-122年间哈德良在西北各省的统治","authors":"P. Bidwell","doi":"10.1017/s0068113x22000186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following collection of seven papers marks the passing of 1900 years since Hadrian travelled through Germany and Britain, setting many things right according to the ancient historians. The emperor left Roman in A.D. 121, probably in the early spring, progressing through Gaul to the German frontier provinces, where he spent the winter. By the summer of the following year he was in Britain, where he almost certainly inspected the building of his great wall on the northern frontier. Winter found him in Tarraco, the principal city of Hispania Tarraconensis. In A.D. 123, he crossed to Africa and then travelled to the east, eventually returning to Rome in A.D. 125. More journeys were to follow, and the amount of time that Hadrian spent in the provinces was exceptional: his successor, Antoninus Pius, never left Italy after he gained power. Consolidation of the frontiers and the prosperity of the provinces were priorities for Hadrian in his administration of the empire. Wolfram Thill argues that the iconography of the Anaglypha Panels in the Roman Forum reflected concerns in the Senate about these policies and reminded the emperor not to neglect matters closer to home. Work on defining the frontier in Upper Germany with a wooden palisade began shortly before Hadrian’s visit, as Thiel explains. This barrier followed a line previously controlled by watch towers, fortlets and forts. Hadrian’s Wall in Britain, also following an existing line of control, was a much stronger fortification, reflecting the troubled state of the frontier which contrasted with the settled conditions in Germany when the palisade was built. Bidwell nevertheless proposes that the first of four stages in the development of the Hadrian’s Wall system incorporated the Devil’s Causeway, a road controlled by forts which ran for 87 km north of the Wall, along the western edge of the densely settled coastal plain of Northumberland. Thiel also refers to Hadrian’s promotions of towns and cities in Upper Germany and Raetia, part of a wider policy of urban development also discussed by Fulford and by Reddé and Mees. In the absence of the rich epigraphic record in the eastern parts of the empire, it is unclear how extensive Hadrian’s benefactions were in the western frontier provinces. Some of his policies had a less welcome effect on some local populations. The building of Hadrian’s Wall, as Bruhn and Hodgson demonstrate, soon disrupted the pattern of settlement which had flourished in north-east England during the late Iron Age and survived the early decades of conquest. Beyond the Wall there seems to have been a shift to more pastoral agriculture supporting far fewer people. To the south, there is increasing evidence for the settlement of immigrants in parts of modern County Durham and North Yorkshire, corresponding to the Britannia 53 (2022), 3–4 doi:10.1017/S0068113X22000186","PeriodicalId":44906,"journal":{"name":"Britannia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Themed Section: Hadrian's Progress through the North-Western Provinces in a.d. 121–122\",\"authors\":\"P. Bidwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0068113x22000186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following collection of seven papers marks the passing of 1900 years since Hadrian travelled through Germany and Britain, setting many things right according to the ancient historians. The emperor left Roman in A.D. 121, probably in the early spring, progressing through Gaul to the German frontier provinces, where he spent the winter. By the summer of the following year he was in Britain, where he almost certainly inspected the building of his great wall on the northern frontier. Winter found him in Tarraco, the principal city of Hispania Tarraconensis. In A.D. 123, he crossed to Africa and then travelled to the east, eventually returning to Rome in A.D. 125. More journeys were to follow, and the amount of time that Hadrian spent in the provinces was exceptional: his successor, Antoninus Pius, never left Italy after he gained power. Consolidation of the frontiers and the prosperity of the provinces were priorities for Hadrian in his administration of the empire. Wolfram Thill argues that the iconography of the Anaglypha Panels in the Roman Forum reflected concerns in the Senate about these policies and reminded the emperor not to neglect matters closer to home. Work on defining the frontier in Upper Germany with a wooden palisade began shortly before Hadrian’s visit, as Thiel explains. This barrier followed a line previously controlled by watch towers, fortlets and forts. Hadrian’s Wall in Britain, also following an existing line of control, was a much stronger fortification, reflecting the troubled state of the frontier which contrasted with the settled conditions in Germany when the palisade was built. Bidwell nevertheless proposes that the first of four stages in the development of the Hadrian’s Wall system incorporated the Devil’s Causeway, a road controlled by forts which ran for 87 km north of the Wall, along the western edge of the densely settled coastal plain of Northumberland. Thiel also refers to Hadrian’s promotions of towns and cities in Upper Germany and Raetia, part of a wider policy of urban development also discussed by Fulford and by Reddé and Mees. In the absence of the rich epigraphic record in the eastern parts of the empire, it is unclear how extensive Hadrian’s benefactions were in the western frontier provinces. Some of his policies had a less welcome effect on some local populations. The building of Hadrian’s Wall, as Bruhn and Hodgson demonstrate, soon disrupted the pattern of settlement which had flourished in north-east England during the late Iron Age and survived the early decades of conquest. Beyond the Wall there seems to have been a shift to more pastoral agriculture supporting far fewer people. To the south, there is increasing evidence for the settlement of immigrants in parts of modern County Durham and North Yorkshire, corresponding to the Britannia 53 (2022), 3–4 doi:10.1017/S0068113X22000186\",\"PeriodicalId\":44906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Britannia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Britannia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068113x22000186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068113x22000186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据古代历史学家的说法,以下七篇论文标志着哈德良穿越德国和英国1900年的过去,纠正了许多错误。皇帝于公元121年离开罗马,可能是在早春,穿过高卢前往德国边境省份,在那里度过了冬天。第二年夏天,他来到了英国,几乎可以肯定,他在那里视察了他在北部边境的长城建筑。温特在塔拉科找到了他,塔拉科是伊斯帕尼亚-塔拉科宁西斯的主要城市。公元123年,他穿越到非洲,然后前往东方,最终于公元125年返回罗马。接下来还有更多的旅程,哈德良在各省度过的时间非同寻常:他的继任者安东尼努斯·庇护在掌权后从未离开过意大利。巩固边疆和繁荣各省是哈德良管理帝国的首要任务。Wolfram Thill认为,罗马论坛中的象形文字小组的图像反映了参议院对这些政策的担忧,并提醒皇帝不要忽视离家更近的事情。蒂尔解释说,在哈德良访问前不久,用木栅栏界定上德国边界的工作就开始了。这道屏障遵循了以前由望塔、堡垒和堡垒控制的防线。英国的哈德良长城也遵循了现有的控制线,是一道坚固得多的防御工事,反映了边境的混乱状态,与德国建造栅栏时的定居条件形成了鲜明对比。然而,Bidwell提出,哈德良长城系统发展的四个阶段中的第一个阶段包括魔鬼堤,这是一条由堡垒控制的道路,在长城以北87公里,沿着诺森伯兰郡人口稠密的沿海平原的西部边缘。蒂尔还提到了哈德良对上德国和雷蒂亚城镇的宣传,这是富尔福德、雷德和梅斯也讨论过的更广泛的城市发展政策的一部分。由于帝国东部缺乏丰富的碑文记录,哈德良在西部边境省份的慈善活动有多广泛尚不清楚。他的一些政策对一些当地居民的影响并不那么受欢迎。正如布鲁恩和霍奇森所展示的那样,哈德良长城的建造很快就打破了铁器时代晚期在英格兰东北部蓬勃发展并在最初几十年的征服中幸存下来的定居模式。在隔离墙之外,似乎已经转向了更多的田园农业,支持的人要少得多。在南部,越来越多的证据表明,移民在现代达勒姆郡和北约克郡的部分地区定居,与不列颠尼亚相对应53(2022),3-4 doi:10.1017/S0068113X22000186
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Themed Section: Hadrian's Progress through the North-Western Provinces in a.d. 121–122
The following collection of seven papers marks the passing of 1900 years since Hadrian travelled through Germany and Britain, setting many things right according to the ancient historians. The emperor left Roman in A.D. 121, probably in the early spring, progressing through Gaul to the German frontier provinces, where he spent the winter. By the summer of the following year he was in Britain, where he almost certainly inspected the building of his great wall on the northern frontier. Winter found him in Tarraco, the principal city of Hispania Tarraconensis. In A.D. 123, he crossed to Africa and then travelled to the east, eventually returning to Rome in A.D. 125. More journeys were to follow, and the amount of time that Hadrian spent in the provinces was exceptional: his successor, Antoninus Pius, never left Italy after he gained power. Consolidation of the frontiers and the prosperity of the provinces were priorities for Hadrian in his administration of the empire. Wolfram Thill argues that the iconography of the Anaglypha Panels in the Roman Forum reflected concerns in the Senate about these policies and reminded the emperor not to neglect matters closer to home. Work on defining the frontier in Upper Germany with a wooden palisade began shortly before Hadrian’s visit, as Thiel explains. This barrier followed a line previously controlled by watch towers, fortlets and forts. Hadrian’s Wall in Britain, also following an existing line of control, was a much stronger fortification, reflecting the troubled state of the frontier which contrasted with the settled conditions in Germany when the palisade was built. Bidwell nevertheless proposes that the first of four stages in the development of the Hadrian’s Wall system incorporated the Devil’s Causeway, a road controlled by forts which ran for 87 km north of the Wall, along the western edge of the densely settled coastal plain of Northumberland. Thiel also refers to Hadrian’s promotions of towns and cities in Upper Germany and Raetia, part of a wider policy of urban development also discussed by Fulford and by Reddé and Mees. In the absence of the rich epigraphic record in the eastern parts of the empire, it is unclear how extensive Hadrian’s benefactions were in the western frontier provinces. Some of his policies had a less welcome effect on some local populations. The building of Hadrian’s Wall, as Bruhn and Hodgson demonstrate, soon disrupted the pattern of settlement which had flourished in north-east England during the late Iron Age and survived the early decades of conquest. Beyond the Wall there seems to have been a shift to more pastoral agriculture supporting far fewer people. To the south, there is increasing evidence for the settlement of immigrants in parts of modern County Durham and North Yorkshire, corresponding to the Britannia 53 (2022), 3–4 doi:10.1017/S0068113X22000186
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Britannia
Britannia Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信