表面地形图系统在脊柱侧弯治疗中的表现:叙述性综述

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Shahrbanoo Bidari, M. Kamyab, Reza Kakavand, A. Komeili
{"title":"表面地形图系统在脊柱侧弯治疗中的表现:叙述性综述","authors":"Shahrbanoo Bidari, M. Kamyab, Reza Kakavand, A. Komeili","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction The aesthetic appearance of the torso is the foremost concern of scoliotic patients, which, if not addressed, could adversely affect their life quality. The Cobb angle limitation in describing three-dimensional (3D) deformities of the spine and its associated ionizing radiation motivated clinicians to implement noninvasive surface topography (ST) methods for monitoring scoliosis. This study aimed to review the accuracy of the most commonly used ST systems and their ST parameters in predicting and monitoring scoliosis. Materials and Methods The scientific databases were used to search for the studies considering the validity and reliability of different ST methods published in English from 1970 to July 2020. Results Of 221 found publications, 41 journal publications were evaluated for this review. The accuracy of ST methods was affected by light source quality, acquisition time, and postural sway. Some ST parameters resulted in a high correlation with radiographic measurements and classified scoliosis deformities into mild, moderate, and severe. Some ST parameters may not effectively predict the Cobb angle but could monitor curve progression accurately. Representing spine deformities in the lumbar section and subjects with higher body mass index was associated with more significant errors due to thicker soft tissues around the spine. Conclusions According to the present review, ST systems could complement radiography measurements and provide valuable insights into different aspects of internal and external deformity; however, they have not reached a state that can replace radiography in the management of scoliosis. Clinical Relevance The present study helps clinicians choose the most appropriate ST methods for predicting and monitoring scoliotic curves and torso asymmetry evaluations.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"35 1","pages":"208 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Surface Topography Systems in Scoliosis Management: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Shahrbanoo Bidari, M. Kamyab, Reza Kakavand, A. Komeili\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction The aesthetic appearance of the torso is the foremost concern of scoliotic patients, which, if not addressed, could adversely affect their life quality. The Cobb angle limitation in describing three-dimensional (3D) deformities of the spine and its associated ionizing radiation motivated clinicians to implement noninvasive surface topography (ST) methods for monitoring scoliosis. This study aimed to review the accuracy of the most commonly used ST systems and their ST parameters in predicting and monitoring scoliosis. Materials and Methods The scientific databases were used to search for the studies considering the validity and reliability of different ST methods published in English from 1970 to July 2020. Results Of 221 found publications, 41 journal publications were evaluated for this review. The accuracy of ST methods was affected by light source quality, acquisition time, and postural sway. Some ST parameters resulted in a high correlation with radiographic measurements and classified scoliosis deformities into mild, moderate, and severe. Some ST parameters may not effectively predict the Cobb angle but could monitor curve progression accurately. Representing spine deformities in the lumbar section and subjects with higher body mass index was associated with more significant errors due to thicker soft tissues around the spine. Conclusions According to the present review, ST systems could complement radiography measurements and provide valuable insights into different aspects of internal and external deformity; however, they have not reached a state that can replace radiography in the management of scoliosis. Clinical Relevance The present study helps clinicians choose the most appropriate ST methods for predicting and monitoring scoliotic curves and torso asymmetry evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"208 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

躯干的美学外观是脊柱侧弯患者最关心的问题,如果不加以解决,可能会对他们的生活质量产生不利影响。Cobb角在描述脊柱三维(3D)畸形及其相关电离辐射方面的局限性促使临床医生采用无创表面形貌(ST)方法监测脊柱侧凸。本研究旨在回顾最常用的ST系统及其ST参数在预测和监测脊柱侧凸中的准确性。材料与方法利用科学数据库检索1970年至2020年7月发表的英文文献中考虑不同ST方法效度和信度的研究。结果221篇文献中,41篇期刊文献被评价。ST方法的精度受光源质量、采集时间和姿态摇摆的影响。一些ST参数与x线测量结果高度相关,并将脊柱侧凸畸形分为轻度、中度和重度。一些ST参数可能不能有效地预测Cobb角,但可以准确地监测曲线的进展。由于脊柱周围的软组织较厚,腰椎畸形和身体质量指数较高的受试者与更显著的误差相关。根据目前的综述,ST系统可以补充x线摄影测量,并为内外畸形的不同方面提供有价值的见解;然而,在脊柱侧凸的治疗中,它们还没有达到可以取代x线摄影的水平。本研究帮助临床医生选择最合适的ST方法来预测和监测脊柱侧弯和躯干不对称评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Surface Topography Systems in Scoliosis Management: A Narrative Review
ABSTRACT Introduction The aesthetic appearance of the torso is the foremost concern of scoliotic patients, which, if not addressed, could adversely affect their life quality. The Cobb angle limitation in describing three-dimensional (3D) deformities of the spine and its associated ionizing radiation motivated clinicians to implement noninvasive surface topography (ST) methods for monitoring scoliosis. This study aimed to review the accuracy of the most commonly used ST systems and their ST parameters in predicting and monitoring scoliosis. Materials and Methods The scientific databases were used to search for the studies considering the validity and reliability of different ST methods published in English from 1970 to July 2020. Results Of 221 found publications, 41 journal publications were evaluated for this review. The accuracy of ST methods was affected by light source quality, acquisition time, and postural sway. Some ST parameters resulted in a high correlation with radiographic measurements and classified scoliosis deformities into mild, moderate, and severe. Some ST parameters may not effectively predict the Cobb angle but could monitor curve progression accurately. Representing spine deformities in the lumbar section and subjects with higher body mass index was associated with more significant errors due to thicker soft tissues around the spine. Conclusions According to the present review, ST systems could complement radiography measurements and provide valuable insights into different aspects of internal and external deformity; however, they have not reached a state that can replace radiography in the management of scoliosis. Clinical Relevance The present study helps clinicians choose the most appropriate ST methods for predicting and monitoring scoliotic curves and torso asymmetry evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信