会计估计的高度不确定性如何影响审计师的诉讼风险?陪审团审判和律师庭外和解的相反效应

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Sean G. Fingland, Jeffrey S. Pickerd, M. D. Piercey
{"title":"会计估计的高度不确定性如何影响审计师的诉讼风险?陪审团审判和律师庭外和解的相反效应","authors":"Sean G. Fingland, Jeffrey S. Pickerd, M. D. Piercey","doi":"10.2308/ciia-2022-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Research suggests that the amount of inherent uncertainty in contemporary accounting estimates has increased in recent years, potentially increasing audit litigation risk. We review a recent study that finds that high estimate uncertainty impacts auditor litigation risk in opposite directions, depending on whether the litigation is decided in a jury trial or settled by attorneys out of court. Mock jurors and attorneys specialized in corporate and securities law read the same case about an alleged undetected material misstatement, with jurors judging auditor negligence and attorneys planning proposed out-of-court settlement negotiations on behalf of auditors. Results show that, under common conditions, mock jurors found auditors less negligent when estimate uncertainty was high. However, attorneys predicted the mock jurors to find auditors more negligent when estimate uncertainty was high, leading them to concede more on behalf of auditors in their proposed settlements.","PeriodicalId":44019,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Auditing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does High Uncertainty in Accounting Estimates Impact Auditor Litigation Risk? Opposite Effects in Jury Trials and Attorneys’ Out-of-Court Settlements\",\"authors\":\"Sean G. Fingland, Jeffrey S. Pickerd, M. D. Piercey\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ciia-2022-021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Research suggests that the amount of inherent uncertainty in contemporary accounting estimates has increased in recent years, potentially increasing audit litigation risk. We review a recent study that finds that high estimate uncertainty impacts auditor litigation risk in opposite directions, depending on whether the litigation is decided in a jury trial or settled by attorneys out of court. Mock jurors and attorneys specialized in corporate and securities law read the same case about an alleged undetected material misstatement, with jurors judging auditor negligence and attorneys planning proposed out-of-court settlement negotiations on behalf of auditors. Results show that, under common conditions, mock jurors found auditors less negligent when estimate uncertainty was high. However, attorneys predicted the mock jurors to find auditors more negligent when estimate uncertainty was high, leading them to concede more on behalf of auditors in their proposed settlements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Auditing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2022-021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2022-021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,近年来,当代会计估计中固有的不确定性增加,可能增加审计诉讼风险。我们回顾了最近的一项研究,该研究发现,高估计不确定性会对审计师的诉讼风险产生相反的影响,这取决于诉讼是在陪审团审判中决定还是由律师庭外解决。模拟陪审员和专门研究公司法和证券法的律师阅读了同一个关于所谓未被发现的重大错报的案件,陪审员判断审计师的疏忽,律师代表审计师计划庭外和解谈判。结果表明,在一般情况下,模拟陪审员发现,当估计不确定性较高时,审计员的疏忽程度较低。然而,律师们预测,当估计的不确定性很高时,模拟陪审员会发现审计师更加疏忽,导致他们在拟议的和解中代表审计师做出更多让步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Does High Uncertainty in Accounting Estimates Impact Auditor Litigation Risk? Opposite Effects in Jury Trials and Attorneys’ Out-of-Court Settlements
Research suggests that the amount of inherent uncertainty in contemporary accounting estimates has increased in recent years, potentially increasing audit litigation risk. We review a recent study that finds that high estimate uncertainty impacts auditor litigation risk in opposite directions, depending on whether the litigation is decided in a jury trial or settled by attorneys out of court. Mock jurors and attorneys specialized in corporate and securities law read the same case about an alleged undetected material misstatement, with jurors judging auditor negligence and attorneys planning proposed out-of-court settlement negotiations on behalf of auditors. Results show that, under common conditions, mock jurors found auditors less negligent when estimate uncertainty was high. However, attorneys predicted the mock jurors to find auditors more negligent when estimate uncertainty was high, leading them to concede more on behalf of auditors in their proposed settlements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Auditing
Current Issues in Auditing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信