{"title":"南非历史利率波动——政权更替的证据","authors":"S. Kennedy-Palmer","doi":"10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate estimates of volatility are important for the valuation and risk management of financial assets. The benchmark interest rate for many assets in South Africa, the 3-month Jibar, is found to exhibit a high volatility persistence when modelled with a standard generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) process. The literature suggests that unobserved regime-switching in interest rate data may lead to an overestimation of volatility persistence. In this study 120 GARCH-type volatility models are tested to determine which model, conditional distribution and number of regimes best fit the data in order to extract the most accurate in-sample estimation of historical volatility for asset pricing. The data analysed consists of 877 weekly observations of 3-month Jibar in total, spanning from September 2001 to July 2018. The switching between regimes is governed by a Markov chain process which produces state-dependent transition probabilities for the unobserved regimes. The study finds that a standard single regime GARCH model may not capture the underlying volatility dynamics of the interest rate. The best performing model in this study is the 4 State Threshold-GARCH indicating that in addition to evidence of regime-switching in the data, there is an asymmetric reaction to negative information.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"43 1","pages":"111 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South African Historical Interest Rate Volatility - Evidence of Regime- Switching\",\"authors\":\"S. Kennedy-Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Accurate estimates of volatility are important for the valuation and risk management of financial assets. The benchmark interest rate for many assets in South Africa, the 3-month Jibar, is found to exhibit a high volatility persistence when modelled with a standard generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) process. The literature suggests that unobserved regime-switching in interest rate data may lead to an overestimation of volatility persistence. In this study 120 GARCH-type volatility models are tested to determine which model, conditional distribution and number of regimes best fit the data in order to extract the most accurate in-sample estimation of historical volatility for asset pricing. The data analysed consists of 877 weekly observations of 3-month Jibar in total, spanning from September 2001 to July 2018. The switching between regimes is governed by a Markov chain process which produces state-dependent transition probabilities for the unobserved regimes. The study finds that a standard single regime GARCH model may not capture the underlying volatility dynamics of the interest rate. The best performing model in this study is the 4 State Threshold-GARCH indicating that in addition to evidence of regime-switching in the data, there is an asymmetric reaction to negative information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
South African Historical Interest Rate Volatility - Evidence of Regime- Switching
Abstract Accurate estimates of volatility are important for the valuation and risk management of financial assets. The benchmark interest rate for many assets in South Africa, the 3-month Jibar, is found to exhibit a high volatility persistence when modelled with a standard generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) process. The literature suggests that unobserved regime-switching in interest rate data may lead to an overestimation of volatility persistence. In this study 120 GARCH-type volatility models are tested to determine which model, conditional distribution and number of regimes best fit the data in order to extract the most accurate in-sample estimation of historical volatility for asset pricing. The data analysed consists of 877 weekly observations of 3-month Jibar in total, spanning from September 2001 to July 2018. The switching between regimes is governed by a Markov chain process which produces state-dependent transition probabilities for the unobserved regimes. The study finds that a standard single regime GARCH model may not capture the underlying volatility dynamics of the interest rate. The best performing model in this study is the 4 State Threshold-GARCH indicating that in addition to evidence of regime-switching in the data, there is an asymmetric reaction to negative information.
期刊介绍:
Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).