{"title":"成瘾社会工作实践中基础研究和干预研究的当前和未来关系——与Michael Fendrich博士的对话","authors":"S. Rose","doi":"10.1080/1533256X.2023.2216519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social Work practitioners have become receptive to the need to seek out and utilize empirically support interventions, or evidence-based interventions as they are more commonly known. While these practitioners have become adept at recognizing such interventions, they may be less skillful at seeking out research that does not seem directly related to practice, or basic nonintervention research, supporting interventions. This relationship between intervention research and basic research is explored in the current discussion. For social workers, access to research is critical in supporting good clinical decisionmaking as to who receives services, how services are provided, and policy that undergirds practice. Many agency administrators are coming to believe that practitioners should be integral in decisions about what get researched, even though they may feel such concerns are disconnected from their everyday duties with clients and communities (Romeo, 2018). At the same time, funding bodies are focusing on implementation research to encourage systematic application of research findings to practice. Moving from basic science research to practice is a principal goal of facilitating evidenced-based service delivery (Olswang & Prelock, 2015), however this remains a significant challenge. Research-based partnerships have certainly been recommended in many educational and social service areas to accomplish the goal (Goldstein et al., 2019), but these have also proved difficult to implement in complex settings. It seems critical to build some consensus in the social work environment that supports and values research in substance use treatment. It has been advised that components of this could include the development of more effective communication networks, better links between researchers and clinicians, and greater involvement of practitioners in the research process (Hemsley-Brown and Sharp (2010). The current state of this process is the focus of our discussion today. We are speaking with Dr. Michael Fendrich, the Scientific Director of Advocate Aurora Research Institute in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He was formerly the Associate Dean for Research at the University of Connecticut, where he is Professor Emeritus, and the Director of the Center for Applied Behavioral Health Research at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Before that, he was a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago.","PeriodicalId":45598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current and future relationship of basic research and intervention research in social work practice in the addictions: a conversation with Michael Fendrich, PhD\",\"authors\":\"S. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1533256X.2023.2216519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social Work practitioners have become receptive to the need to seek out and utilize empirically support interventions, or evidence-based interventions as they are more commonly known. While these practitioners have become adept at recognizing such interventions, they may be less skillful at seeking out research that does not seem directly related to practice, or basic nonintervention research, supporting interventions. This relationship between intervention research and basic research is explored in the current discussion. For social workers, access to research is critical in supporting good clinical decisionmaking as to who receives services, how services are provided, and policy that undergirds practice. Many agency administrators are coming to believe that practitioners should be integral in decisions about what get researched, even though they may feel such concerns are disconnected from their everyday duties with clients and communities (Romeo, 2018). At the same time, funding bodies are focusing on implementation research to encourage systematic application of research findings to practice. Moving from basic science research to practice is a principal goal of facilitating evidenced-based service delivery (Olswang & Prelock, 2015), however this remains a significant challenge. Research-based partnerships have certainly been recommended in many educational and social service areas to accomplish the goal (Goldstein et al., 2019), but these have also proved difficult to implement in complex settings. It seems critical to build some consensus in the social work environment that supports and values research in substance use treatment. It has been advised that components of this could include the development of more effective communication networks, better links between researchers and clinicians, and greater involvement of practitioners in the research process (Hemsley-Brown and Sharp (2010). The current state of this process is the focus of our discussion today. We are speaking with Dr. Michael Fendrich, the Scientific Director of Advocate Aurora Research Institute in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He was formerly the Associate Dean for Research at the University of Connecticut, where he is Professor Emeritus, and the Director of the Center for Applied Behavioral Health Research at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Before that, he was a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2023.2216519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2023.2216519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
社会工作从业者已经接受了寻求和利用经验支持干预措施或循证干预措施的必要性,因为这些干预措施更为常见。虽然这些从业者已经变得善于识别这种干预措施,但他们可能不太善于寻找与实践没有直接关系的研究,或支持干预措施的基本非干预研究。干预研究和基础研究之间的关系在当前的讨论中进行了探讨。对于社会工作者来说,获得研究对于支持谁接受服务、如何提供服务以及支持实践的政策等良好的临床决策至关重要。许多机构管理人员开始相信,从业者应该参与研究内容的决策,尽管他们可能觉得这种担忧与他们与客户和社区的日常职责脱节(Romeo,2018)。与此同时,资助机构正专注于实施研究,以鼓励将研究结果系统地应用于实践。从基础科学研究转向实践是促进基于证据的服务提供的主要目标(Olswang&Prelock,2015),但这仍然是一个重大挑战。为了实现这一目标,许多教育和社会服务领域肯定建议建立基于研究的伙伴关系(Goldstein et al.,2019),但事实证明,这些伙伴关系在复杂的环境中也很难实施。在支持和重视药物使用治疗研究的社会工作环境中建立一些共识似乎至关重要。有人建议,这其中的组成部分可能包括发展更有效的沟通网络,研究人员和临床医生之间更好的联系,以及从业者更多地参与研究过程(Hemsley Brown和Sharp(2010)。这一进程的现状是我们今天讨论的重点。我们采访了威斯康星州密尔沃基Advocate Aurora研究所的科学主任Michael Fendrich博士。他曾任康涅狄格大学研究副院长,名誉教授,威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校应用行为健康研究中心主任。在此之前,他是芝加哥伊利诺伊大学的精神病学教授。
The current and future relationship of basic research and intervention research in social work practice in the addictions: a conversation with Michael Fendrich, PhD
Social Work practitioners have become receptive to the need to seek out and utilize empirically support interventions, or evidence-based interventions as they are more commonly known. While these practitioners have become adept at recognizing such interventions, they may be less skillful at seeking out research that does not seem directly related to practice, or basic nonintervention research, supporting interventions. This relationship between intervention research and basic research is explored in the current discussion. For social workers, access to research is critical in supporting good clinical decisionmaking as to who receives services, how services are provided, and policy that undergirds practice. Many agency administrators are coming to believe that practitioners should be integral in decisions about what get researched, even though they may feel such concerns are disconnected from their everyday duties with clients and communities (Romeo, 2018). At the same time, funding bodies are focusing on implementation research to encourage systematic application of research findings to practice. Moving from basic science research to practice is a principal goal of facilitating evidenced-based service delivery (Olswang & Prelock, 2015), however this remains a significant challenge. Research-based partnerships have certainly been recommended in many educational and social service areas to accomplish the goal (Goldstein et al., 2019), but these have also proved difficult to implement in complex settings. It seems critical to build some consensus in the social work environment that supports and values research in substance use treatment. It has been advised that components of this could include the development of more effective communication networks, better links between researchers and clinicians, and greater involvement of practitioners in the research process (Hemsley-Brown and Sharp (2010). The current state of this process is the focus of our discussion today. We are speaking with Dr. Michael Fendrich, the Scientific Director of Advocate Aurora Research Institute in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He was formerly the Associate Dean for Research at the University of Connecticut, where he is Professor Emeritus, and the Director of the Center for Applied Behavioral Health Research at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Before that, he was a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions is designed to help social work practitioners stay abreast of the latest developments in the field of addictions. This journal publishes refereed articles on innovative individual, family, group work, and community practice models for treating and preventing substance abuse and other addictions in diverse populations. The journal focuses on research findings, health care, social policies, and program administration directly affecting social work practice in the addictions. The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions has several regular features of interest to social workers in the field of addictions.