对《现代广告与受众关注市场评论》一书的回应

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Zoe Sherman
{"title":"对《现代广告与受众关注市场评论》一书的回应","authors":"Zoe Sherman","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2021.1924474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key question I attempted to answer with my book Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention. was the question of how the commodification of attention happened. In turn, three scholars – Shahram Azhar, Nora Draper, and Daniel Pope – raised important questions about my book. They raise interrelated interpretative questions about the agency and consciousness of audiences and the relation between mass appeals and narrowly targeted marketing. They also raise the philosophical, ethical, and political question of how to respond to attention commodification. In this response I engage their questions, though with few definitive conclusions (especially on the last point).","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"450 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Book Symposium Commentaries on Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2021.1924474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The key question I attempted to answer with my book Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention. was the question of how the commodification of attention happened. In turn, three scholars – Shahram Azhar, Nora Draper, and Daniel Pope – raised important questions about my book. They raise interrelated interpretative questions about the agency and consciousness of audiences and the relation between mass appeals and narrowly targeted marketing. They also raise the philosophical, ethical, and political question of how to respond to attention commodification. In this response I engage their questions, though with few definitive conclusions (especially on the last point).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"450 - 457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1924474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1924474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我在《现代广告与受众关注市场》一书中试图回答的关键问题。是注意力商品化是如何发生的问题。反过来,三位学者——Shahram Azhar、Nora Draper和Daniel Pope——对我的书提出了重要的问题。它们提出了关于受众的代理和意识以及大众诉求和狭义营销之间关系的相互关联的解释问题。它们还提出了如何应对注意力商品化的哲学、伦理和政治问题。在这一回应中,我参与了他们的问题,尽管很少有明确的结论(尤其是关于最后一点)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Book Symposium Commentaries on Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention
The key question I attempted to answer with my book Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention. was the question of how the commodification of attention happened. In turn, three scholars – Shahram Azhar, Nora Draper, and Daniel Pope – raised important questions about my book. They raise interrelated interpretative questions about the agency and consciousness of audiences and the relation between mass appeals and narrowly targeted marketing. They also raise the philosophical, ethical, and political question of how to respond to attention commodification. In this response I engage their questions, though with few definitive conclusions (especially on the last point).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信