认知运动控制测试的节段和节段间协调特征:量化运动选择的损失

Lincoln Blandford, Emily J. Cushion, Ryan Mahaffey
{"title":"认知运动控制测试的节段和节段间协调特征:量化运动选择的损失","authors":"Lincoln Blandford, Emily J. Cushion, Ryan Mahaffey","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics2020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive movement control tests are hypothesized to reveal reduced coordination variability, a feature of motor behaviour linked to clinical presentations. Exploration of this proposition via kinematic analysis of test pass and fail conditions is yet to be conducted. Kinematics (3D) were collected as 28 participants were qualitatively rated during nine trials of a cognitive movement control test. Ten female and two male participants passing the test were matched to twelve participants who failed (three males, nine females). Sagittal plane pelvis and knee angles were determined. Peak pelvic deviation and knee flexion maxima/minima were compared between groups. Classification tree analysis explored relationships between test failure and pelvis–knee intersegmental coordination strategy classifications derived from novel and traditional vector coding techniques. Coordination variability waveforms were assessed via SPM. Age, BMI, and knee flexion values did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05); however, participants rated as failing the test displayed greater pelvic deviation (p < 0.05). Classification tree analysis revealed a greater use of pelvic dominant intersegmental coordination strategies from both vector coding techniques (p < 0.001) by fail-group participants. The fail-group also displayed lower coordination variability for novel (p < 0.05), but not traditional (p > 0.05) vector coding technique waveforms, supporting the premise that the testing protocol may act as a qualitative approach to inform on features of motor behavior linked to clinical presentations.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmental and Intersegmental Coordination Characteristics of a Cognitive Movement Control Test: Quantifying Loss of Movement Choices\",\"authors\":\"Lincoln Blandford, Emily J. Cushion, Ryan Mahaffey\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomechanics2020018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive movement control tests are hypothesized to reveal reduced coordination variability, a feature of motor behaviour linked to clinical presentations. Exploration of this proposition via kinematic analysis of test pass and fail conditions is yet to be conducted. Kinematics (3D) were collected as 28 participants were qualitatively rated during nine trials of a cognitive movement control test. Ten female and two male participants passing the test were matched to twelve participants who failed (three males, nine females). Sagittal plane pelvis and knee angles were determined. Peak pelvic deviation and knee flexion maxima/minima were compared between groups. Classification tree analysis explored relationships between test failure and pelvis–knee intersegmental coordination strategy classifications derived from novel and traditional vector coding techniques. Coordination variability waveforms were assessed via SPM. Age, BMI, and knee flexion values did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05); however, participants rated as failing the test displayed greater pelvic deviation (p < 0.05). Classification tree analysis revealed a greater use of pelvic dominant intersegmental coordination strategies from both vector coding techniques (p < 0.001) by fail-group participants. The fail-group also displayed lower coordination variability for novel (p < 0.05), but not traditional (p > 0.05) vector coding technique waveforms, supporting the premise that the testing protocol may act as a qualitative approach to inform on features of motor behavior linked to clinical presentations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics2020018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics2020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知运动控制测试被假设为显示协调变异性降低,这是与临床表现相关的运动行为特征。通过测试通过和失败条件的运动学分析来探索这一命题尚待进行。在一项认知运动控制测试的九项试验中,28名参与者被定性评分,收集了运动学(3D)。通过测试的10名女性和2名男性参与者与12名未通过测试的参与者(3名男性,9名女性)相匹配。确定矢状面骨盆和膝盖角度。比较各组之间的峰值骨盆偏移和膝关节屈曲最大值/最小值。分类树分析探讨了测试失败和骨盆-膝盖节段间协调策略分类之间的关系,这些分类源自新的和传统的矢量编码技术。通过SPM评估协调变异性波形。年龄、BMI和膝关节屈曲值在各组之间没有差异(p>0.05);然而,被评定为测试失败的参与者显示出更大的骨盆偏差(p<0.05)。分类树分析显示,失败组参与者更多地使用两种矢量编码技术中的骨盆优势节段间协调策略(p<0.001)。失败组在新的(p<0.05)但不是传统的(p>0.05)矢量编码技术波形方面也表现出较低的协调变异性,这支持了测试方案可以作为一种定性方法来告知与临床表现相关的运动行为特征的前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Segmental and Intersegmental Coordination Characteristics of a Cognitive Movement Control Test: Quantifying Loss of Movement Choices
Cognitive movement control tests are hypothesized to reveal reduced coordination variability, a feature of motor behaviour linked to clinical presentations. Exploration of this proposition via kinematic analysis of test pass and fail conditions is yet to be conducted. Kinematics (3D) were collected as 28 participants were qualitatively rated during nine trials of a cognitive movement control test. Ten female and two male participants passing the test were matched to twelve participants who failed (three males, nine females). Sagittal plane pelvis and knee angles were determined. Peak pelvic deviation and knee flexion maxima/minima were compared between groups. Classification tree analysis explored relationships between test failure and pelvis–knee intersegmental coordination strategy classifications derived from novel and traditional vector coding techniques. Coordination variability waveforms were assessed via SPM. Age, BMI, and knee flexion values did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05); however, participants rated as failing the test displayed greater pelvic deviation (p < 0.05). Classification tree analysis revealed a greater use of pelvic dominant intersegmental coordination strategies from both vector coding techniques (p < 0.001) by fail-group participants. The fail-group also displayed lower coordination variability for novel (p < 0.05), but not traditional (p > 0.05) vector coding technique waveforms, supporting the premise that the testing protocol may act as a qualitative approach to inform on features of motor behavior linked to clinical presentations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信