{"title":"最常用的动态面板数据估计器在小样本中是否具有最佳性能?蒙特卡洛比较","authors":"Blanka Škrabić Perić","doi":"10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Differenced GMM and system GMM estimators are the two most frequently used dynamic panel estimators. Regardless the fact that both estimators are proposed for samples with a large N and short T, both of them are frequently used for small samples. Therefore, this paper compares the small sample properties of these two estimators with standard dynamic LSDV and LSDV bias-corrected estimators to examine the justification of their frequent use. Data set dimensions are formed considering dimensions of previous empirical studies that use dynamic panel data on small samples. The results show that LSDV bias-corrected estimator has the smallest RMSE in almost every design while in terms of bias, the results are mixed. LSDV bias-corrected outperforms both GMM estimators in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 10 and the number of time periods is 30. GMM estimators show somewhat better properties in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 30 and the number of time periods is 10.","PeriodicalId":44065,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Operational Research Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do the most frequently used dynamic panel data estimators have the best performance in a small sample? A Monte Carlo comparison\",\"authors\":\"Blanka Škrabić Perić\",\"doi\":\"10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Differenced GMM and system GMM estimators are the two most frequently used dynamic panel estimators. Regardless the fact that both estimators are proposed for samples with a large N and short T, both of them are frequently used for small samples. Therefore, this paper compares the small sample properties of these two estimators with standard dynamic LSDV and LSDV bias-corrected estimators to examine the justification of their frequent use. Data set dimensions are formed considering dimensions of previous empirical studies that use dynamic panel data on small samples. The results show that LSDV bias-corrected estimator has the smallest RMSE in almost every design while in terms of bias, the results are mixed. LSDV bias-corrected outperforms both GMM estimators in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 10 and the number of time periods is 30. GMM estimators show somewhat better properties in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 30 and the number of time periods is 10.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Operational Research Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Operational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Operational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17535/CRORR.2019.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do the most frequently used dynamic panel data estimators have the best performance in a small sample? A Monte Carlo comparison
. Differenced GMM and system GMM estimators are the two most frequently used dynamic panel estimators. Regardless the fact that both estimators are proposed for samples with a large N and short T, both of them are frequently used for small samples. Therefore, this paper compares the small sample properties of these two estimators with standard dynamic LSDV and LSDV bias-corrected estimators to examine the justification of their frequent use. Data set dimensions are formed considering dimensions of previous empirical studies that use dynamic panel data on small samples. The results show that LSDV bias-corrected estimator has the smallest RMSE in almost every design while in terms of bias, the results are mixed. LSDV bias-corrected outperforms both GMM estimators in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 10 and the number of time periods is 30. GMM estimators show somewhat better properties in terms of bias in design when the number of individuals is 30 and the number of time periods is 10.
期刊介绍:
Croatian Operational Research Review (CRORR) is the journal which publishes original scientific papers from the area of operational research. The purpose is to publish papers from various aspects of operational research (OR) with the aim of presenting scientific ideas that will contribute both to theoretical development and practical application of OR. The scope of the journal covers the following subject areas: linear and non-linear programming, integer programing, combinatorial and discrete optimization, multi-objective programming, stohastic models and optimization, scheduling, macroeconomics, economic theory, game theory, statistics and econometrics, marketing and data analysis, information and decision support systems, banking, finance, insurance, environment, energy, health, neural networks and fuzzy systems, control theory, simulation, practical OR and applications. The audience includes both researchers and practitioners from the area of operations research, applied mathematics, statistics, econometrics, intelligent methods, simulation, and other areas included in the above list of topics. The journal has an international board of editors, consisting of more than 30 editors – university professors from Croatia, Slovenia, USA, Italy, Germany, Austria and other coutries.