新持牌护士在大流行期间参加护士学徒计划后的过渡

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Scott S. Christensen , Sue Chase-Cantarini , Hui Li , Xiaoming Sheng , Tracey L. Nixon , Marla J. De Jong
{"title":"新持牌护士在大流行期间参加护士学徒计划后的过渡","authors":"Scott S. Christensen ,&nbsp;Sue Chase-Cantarini ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Sheng ,&nbsp;Tracey L. Nixon ,&nbsp;Marla J. De Jong","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurse apprentice/externship programs, some including students obtaining an apprentice license before graduation, prepare students to transition to practice. Some United States regions authorised new apprentice programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aimed to compare how newly licensed registered nurses (RNs) who participated or did not participate in an apprentice program during the pandemic perceived the transition to practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We compared participants with (<em>n</em> = 14) and without (<em>n</em><span> = 18) apprentice training by administering surveys at 2, 6, and 12 months post RN employment. Participants completed the Casey-Fink Graduate Nurse Experience Survey (CFGNES) and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). We used Cronbach’s alpha to assess survey domain internal consistency and compared CFGNES scores between cohorts using a linear regression model.</span></p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The nurse apprentice and standard training cohorts had mean composite CFGNES scores of 76.8 (SD = 7.52) vs. 71.9 (SD = 6.68), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01; higher scores suggested positive values for workplace support, stress, communication/leadership, and professional satisfaction. Participant OLBI scores indicated burnout among both cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The recipients of the nurse apprentice program perceived transitioning into RN roles more favourably than those without this experience, implying newly licensed RNs benefit from nurse apprentice experiences. Job/professional satisfaction and workplace integration may play a role in promoting the transition to practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurse apprentice programs may promote satisfaction and acclimatisation among newly licensed RNs, even during pandemic work conditions. Healthcare leaders are encouraged to advocate for nurse apprentice programs, including pathways for apprentice licensure and program implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 633-639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newly licensed nurses’ transition during the pandemic after participating in nurse apprentice program\",\"authors\":\"Scott S. Christensen ,&nbsp;Sue Chase-Cantarini ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Sheng ,&nbsp;Tracey L. Nixon ,&nbsp;Marla J. De Jong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurse apprentice/externship programs, some including students obtaining an apprentice license before graduation, prepare students to transition to practice. Some United States regions authorised new apprentice programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aimed to compare how newly licensed registered nurses (RNs) who participated or did not participate in an apprentice program during the pandemic perceived the transition to practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We compared participants with (<em>n</em> = 14) and without (<em>n</em><span> = 18) apprentice training by administering surveys at 2, 6, and 12 months post RN employment. Participants completed the Casey-Fink Graduate Nurse Experience Survey (CFGNES) and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). We used Cronbach’s alpha to assess survey domain internal consistency and compared CFGNES scores between cohorts using a linear regression model.</span></p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The nurse apprentice and standard training cohorts had mean composite CFGNES scores of 76.8 (SD = 7.52) vs. 71.9 (SD = 6.68), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01; higher scores suggested positive values for workplace support, stress, communication/leadership, and professional satisfaction. Participant OLBI scores indicated burnout among both cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The recipients of the nurse apprentice program perceived transitioning into RN roles more favourably than those without this experience, implying newly licensed RNs benefit from nurse apprentice experiences. Job/professional satisfaction and workplace integration may play a role in promoting the transition to practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurse apprentice programs may promote satisfaction and acclimatisation among newly licensed RNs, even during pandemic work conditions. Healthcare leaders are encouraged to advocate for nurse apprentice programs, including pathways for apprentice licensure and program implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 633-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护士学徒/实习项目,包括一些在毕业前获得学徒执照的学生,为学生过渡到实践做好准备。美国一些地区在2019年冠状病毒大流行期间批准了新的学徒计划。AimWe旨在比较在大流行期间参加或未参加学徒计划的新注册护士(RNs)对向实践过渡的看法。方法:我们在注册护士入职后2、6和12个月对接受学徒培训的参与者(n = 14)和未接受学徒培训的参与者(n = 18)进行了调查。参与者完成了Casey-Fink毕业生护士经历调查(CFGNES)和Oldenburg倦怠量表(OLBI)。我们使用Cronbach 's alpha来评估调查域内部一致性,并使用线性回归模型比较队列之间的CFGNES得分。结果护士学徒组和标准培训组的CFGNES平均综合评分分别为76.8分(SD = 7.52)和71.9分(SD = 6.68), p <0.01;得分越高,表明工作场所支持、压力、沟通/领导和职业满意度的价值越高。参与者的OLBI得分表明两组的倦怠。接受护士学徒计划的人比没有这方面经验的人更容易过渡到注册护士角色,这意味着新注册护士从护士学徒经验中受益。工作/专业满意度和工作场所整合可能在促进向实践的过渡中发挥作用。结论护士学徒计划可以提高新注册护士的满意度和适应能力,即使在大流行的工作环境下也是如此。鼓励医疗保健领导者倡导护士学徒计划,包括学徒执照和计划实施的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Newly licensed nurses’ transition during the pandemic after participating in nurse apprentice program

Background

Nurse apprentice/externship programs, some including students obtaining an apprentice license before graduation, prepare students to transition to practice. Some United States regions authorised new apprentice programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Aim

We aimed to compare how newly licensed registered nurses (RNs) who participated or did not participate in an apprentice program during the pandemic perceived the transition to practice.

Methods

We compared participants with (n = 14) and without (n = 18) apprentice training by administering surveys at 2, 6, and 12 months post RN employment. Participants completed the Casey-Fink Graduate Nurse Experience Survey (CFGNES) and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). We used Cronbach’s alpha to assess survey domain internal consistency and compared CFGNES scores between cohorts using a linear regression model.

Findings

The nurse apprentice and standard training cohorts had mean composite CFGNES scores of 76.8 (SD = 7.52) vs. 71.9 (SD = 6.68), p < 0.01; higher scores suggested positive values for workplace support, stress, communication/leadership, and professional satisfaction. Participant OLBI scores indicated burnout among both cohorts.

Discussion

The recipients of the nurse apprentice program perceived transitioning into RN roles more favourably than those without this experience, implying newly licensed RNs benefit from nurse apprentice experiences. Job/professional satisfaction and workplace integration may play a role in promoting the transition to practice.

Conclusion

Nurse apprentice programs may promote satisfaction and acclimatisation among newly licensed RNs, even during pandemic work conditions. Healthcare leaders are encouraged to advocate for nurse apprentice programs, including pathways for apprentice licensure and program implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信