两种清洁方式对车站卫生间地板表面细菌的定量和定性研究

Q4 Engineering
T. Kawasaki, T. Kyotani, Tomoyoshi Ushiogi, Sachiko Yoshie
{"title":"两种清洁方式对车站卫生间地板表面细菌的定量和定性研究","authors":"T. Kawasaki, T. Kyotani, Tomoyoshi Ushiogi, Sachiko Yoshie","doi":"10.2219/rtriqr.62.4_281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two types of method for cleaning station restrooms. One method uses water for cleaning floors, whereas the second does not. This study describes quantitative and qualitative research into the sur face bacteria found on station restroom floors where these two cleaning methods were used. Samples for analysis were collected from five positions on the floor of each restroom in each railway station investigated. Samples were treated using a conventional culture method to measure the concentrations of surface bacteria on each restroom floor. Samples were then analyzed with bacterial 16S rRNA genes to analysis the microbi omes on these restroom floors. Results showed that the restrooms cleaned without water had lower concen trations of bacteria, than the microbiomes from restroom floors cleaned with water. A and C in October 2018, January and July 2019, and in Stations B and D in July 2019. At Stations A and C, a qualitative investigation was conducted during the daytime (during business hours) on January 8, 2019 (Table 2). The temperature and humidity recorded at the time of the investigation are listed in the same table. Each of the 5 sampling positions were investigated qualitative-ly and quantitatively: under washbasins, under urinals, between urinals, and the central and back corners of the floor, in each station. Bacteria was collected from floors using one of two possible methods. The first method used a 10-cm square frame, which was Earth retaining structures, such as bridge abutments and retaining walls, are con-structed at the boundary of bridges or embankments. There are a variety of earth retaining structure failure modes, therefore in order to be able to ensure rational aseismic reinforcement, it is necessary to develop a range of different aseismic reinforcement methods adapted to the relevant earth retaining structure’s failure mode. Moreover, there are many cases where construction work is severely restricted due to various limitations, such as land boundaries, available space, and time available for construction work. Therefore, the authors propose an aseismic reinforcement method, which can both improve seismic performance of earth retaining structures and be carried out efficiently. This paper outlines this research and describes some examples of the practical application of the newly developed reinforcement method.","PeriodicalId":52445,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative and Qualitative Research of Surface Bacteria on the Floor of Station Restrooms with Two Types of Cleaning Method\",\"authors\":\"T. Kawasaki, T. Kyotani, Tomoyoshi Ushiogi, Sachiko Yoshie\",\"doi\":\"10.2219/rtriqr.62.4_281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two types of method for cleaning station restrooms. One method uses water for cleaning floors, whereas the second does not. This study describes quantitative and qualitative research into the sur face bacteria found on station restroom floors where these two cleaning methods were used. Samples for analysis were collected from five positions on the floor of each restroom in each railway station investigated. Samples were treated using a conventional culture method to measure the concentrations of surface bacteria on each restroom floor. Samples were then analyzed with bacterial 16S rRNA genes to analysis the microbi omes on these restroom floors. Results showed that the restrooms cleaned without water had lower concen trations of bacteria, than the microbiomes from restroom floors cleaned with water. A and C in October 2018, January and July 2019, and in Stations B and D in July 2019. At Stations A and C, a qualitative investigation was conducted during the daytime (during business hours) on January 8, 2019 (Table 2). The temperature and humidity recorded at the time of the investigation are listed in the same table. Each of the 5 sampling positions were investigated qualitative-ly and quantitatively: under washbasins, under urinals, between urinals, and the central and back corners of the floor, in each station. Bacteria was collected from floors using one of two possible methods. The first method used a 10-cm square frame, which was Earth retaining structures, such as bridge abutments and retaining walls, are con-structed at the boundary of bridges or embankments. There are a variety of earth retaining structure failure modes, therefore in order to be able to ensure rational aseismic reinforcement, it is necessary to develop a range of different aseismic reinforcement methods adapted to the relevant earth retaining structure’s failure mode. Moreover, there are many cases where construction work is severely restricted due to various limitations, such as land boundaries, available space, and time available for construction work. Therefore, the authors propose an aseismic reinforcement method, which can both improve seismic performance of earth retaining structures and be carried out efficiently. This paper outlines this research and describes some examples of the practical application of the newly developed reinforcement method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.62.4_281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.62.4_281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有两种清洁车站洗手间的方法。一种方法是用水清洁地板,而另一种方法则不用。本研究描述了对使用这两种清洁方法的车站洗手间地板表面细菌的定量和定性研究。用于分析的样本从每个调查的火车站的每个洗手间地板的五个位置收集。使用常规培养方法对样品进行处理,以测量每个洗手间地板表面细菌的浓度。然后用细菌16S rRNA基因对样本进行分析,以分析这些洗手间地板上的微生物组。结果表明,不用水清洗的洗手间的细菌浓度低于用水清洗的洗手间地板上的微生物浓度。A站和C站在2018年10月,2019年1月和7月,B站和D站在2019年7月。在A站和C站,于2019年1月8日白天(营业时间)进行了定性调查(表2)。调查时记录的温度和湿度在同表中列出。对每个站点的洗手盆下、小便池下、小便池之间、地板中央和后角的5个采样位置分别进行定性和定量调查。从地板上收集细菌的方法有两种。第一种方法使用了一个10厘米见方的框架,即在桥梁或堤岸的边界上建造土方结构,如桥台和挡土墙。挡土结构的破坏模式多种多样,因此为了能够保证合理的抗震加固,有必要制定一系列适应相应挡土结构破坏模式的不同抗震加固方法。此外,在许多情况下,由于各种限制,如土地边界、可用空间和可用于建筑工作的时间,建筑工作受到严重限制。为此,提出了一种既能提高挡土结构抗震性能又能有效实施的抗震加固方法。本文概述了本文的研究工作,并介绍了新开发的加固方法的一些实际应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative and Qualitative Research of Surface Bacteria on the Floor of Station Restrooms with Two Types of Cleaning Method
There are two types of method for cleaning station restrooms. One method uses water for cleaning floors, whereas the second does not. This study describes quantitative and qualitative research into the sur face bacteria found on station restroom floors where these two cleaning methods were used. Samples for analysis were collected from five positions on the floor of each restroom in each railway station investigated. Samples were treated using a conventional culture method to measure the concentrations of surface bacteria on each restroom floor. Samples were then analyzed with bacterial 16S rRNA genes to analysis the microbi omes on these restroom floors. Results showed that the restrooms cleaned without water had lower concen trations of bacteria, than the microbiomes from restroom floors cleaned with water. A and C in October 2018, January and July 2019, and in Stations B and D in July 2019. At Stations A and C, a qualitative investigation was conducted during the daytime (during business hours) on January 8, 2019 (Table 2). The temperature and humidity recorded at the time of the investigation are listed in the same table. Each of the 5 sampling positions were investigated qualitative-ly and quantitatively: under washbasins, under urinals, between urinals, and the central and back corners of the floor, in each station. Bacteria was collected from floors using one of two possible methods. The first method used a 10-cm square frame, which was Earth retaining structures, such as bridge abutments and retaining walls, are con-structed at the boundary of bridges or embankments. There are a variety of earth retaining structure failure modes, therefore in order to be able to ensure rational aseismic reinforcement, it is necessary to develop a range of different aseismic reinforcement methods adapted to the relevant earth retaining structure’s failure mode. Moreover, there are many cases where construction work is severely restricted due to various limitations, such as land boundaries, available space, and time available for construction work. Therefore, the authors propose an aseismic reinforcement method, which can both improve seismic performance of earth retaining structures and be carried out efficiently. This paper outlines this research and describes some examples of the practical application of the newly developed reinforcement method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信