受虐待的在家上学儿童值得法律保护:对Ray和Shakel的回应(2022)

Q2 Social Sciences
Gabrielle Stewart, C. McCracken
{"title":"受虐待的在家上学儿童值得法律保护:对Ray和Shakel的回应(2022)","authors":"Gabrielle Stewart, C. McCracken","doi":"10.1080/15582159.2022.2163967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this short response, we at the Coalition for Responsible Home Education (CRHE) offer two critiques of Ray and Shakeel’s (2022) recent study on the influence of demographic factors on homeschool safety. We argue that, while the study’s methodology is novel and valuable, concerns remain about its usage of snowball sampling to overrepresent certain demographics, as well as shortcomings in the survey instrument and its validation. Our main critique, however, questions the study’s ideological roots. We argue that Ray and Shakeel’s aim is to circumvent consideration of potential changes to policy measures that would protect homeschooled children. In CRHE’s view, closing loopholes that enable abuse to occur unnoticed takes precedence over determining incidence of abuse relative to school type. Indeed, we caution against conflating the relative incidence of abuse within homeschooling communities with its absolute importance to a society that prioritizes child safety.","PeriodicalId":34913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Choice","volume":"17 1","pages":"214 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abused Homeschooled Children Deserve Legal Protections: A Response to Ray and Shakeel (2022)\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Stewart, C. McCracken\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15582159.2022.2163967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this short response, we at the Coalition for Responsible Home Education (CRHE) offer two critiques of Ray and Shakeel’s (2022) recent study on the influence of demographic factors on homeschool safety. We argue that, while the study’s methodology is novel and valuable, concerns remain about its usage of snowball sampling to overrepresent certain demographics, as well as shortcomings in the survey instrument and its validation. Our main critique, however, questions the study’s ideological roots. We argue that Ray and Shakeel’s aim is to circumvent consideration of potential changes to policy measures that would protect homeschooled children. In CRHE’s view, closing loopholes that enable abuse to occur unnoticed takes precedence over determining incidence of abuse relative to school type. Indeed, we caution against conflating the relative incidence of abuse within homeschooling communities with its absolute importance to a society that prioritizes child safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Choice\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2022.2163967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2022.2163967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇简短的回应中,我们负责任家庭教育联盟(CRHE)对Ray和Shakeel(2022)最近关于人口因素对家庭学校安全影响的研究提出了两项批评。我们认为,虽然这项研究的方法新颖而有价值,但人们仍然担心它使用雪球抽样来过度代表某些人口统计数据,以及调查工具及其验证的缺点。然而,我们的主要批评是质疑这项研究的意识形态根源。我们认为,Ray和Shakeel的目的是避免考虑保护在家上学儿童的政策措施的潜在变化。在CRHE看来,堵住使虐待行为不被注意的漏洞比确定与学校类型相关的虐待发生率更重要。事实上,我们警告不要将在家上学社区的相对虐待发生率与它对优先考虑儿童安全的社会的绝对重要性混为一谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abused Homeschooled Children Deserve Legal Protections: A Response to Ray and Shakeel (2022)
ABSTRACT In this short response, we at the Coalition for Responsible Home Education (CRHE) offer two critiques of Ray and Shakeel’s (2022) recent study on the influence of demographic factors on homeschool safety. We argue that, while the study’s methodology is novel and valuable, concerns remain about its usage of snowball sampling to overrepresent certain demographics, as well as shortcomings in the survey instrument and its validation. Our main critique, however, questions the study’s ideological roots. We argue that Ray and Shakeel’s aim is to circumvent consideration of potential changes to policy measures that would protect homeschooled children. In CRHE’s view, closing loopholes that enable abuse to occur unnoticed takes precedence over determining incidence of abuse relative to school type. Indeed, we caution against conflating the relative incidence of abuse within homeschooling communities with its absolute importance to a society that prioritizes child safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Choice
Journal of School Choice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信