COVID-19大流行早期症状管理和专科姑息治疗应用的比较:一项多地点回顾性图表综述

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Madelaine Baetz-Dougan, J. Guan, B. Henry, K. Stilos, Desmond D. Leung, Niren Shetty, Shruti Gupta, A. Chakraborty
{"title":"COVID-19大流行早期症状管理和专科姑息治疗应用的比较:一项多地点回顾性图表综述","authors":"Madelaine Baetz-Dougan, J. Guan, B. Henry, K. Stilos, Desmond D. Leung, Niren Shetty, Shruti Gupta, A. Chakraborty","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2023.2241784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Previous work has described symptom management provided by specialists in palliative care for COVID-19 patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing primary level palliative care provided by general internal medicine teams or reasons for referral to specialists. Objective: Our aim was to describe and compare the following outcomes for patients dying of COVID-19: (1) symptom management by acute care providers and palliative care specialists, and (2) utilization of palliative care consultation across two acute care hospitals in Toronto, Ontario during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We undertook a retrospective chart review of 45 adult inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 23 January 2020 to 19 May 2020 who died, and/or those who had a palliative care consultation. Findings: Forty-one of the 45 patients died. Common symptoms were shortness of breath and agitation. For these symptoms, pharmacologic management was not significantly different for patients seen by palliative care compared to those without consultation. Most consultations were for end-of-life care. There were significantly more palliative care consults for COVID-19 patients at one hospital (P=.001). Conclusion: The findings highlight the significant discrepancy in involvement of specialist palliative care between settings. More research is needed to validate the initial findings from this small sample size, understand the needs of palliative care providers in this setting, and appreciate the factors influencing consultation.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of symptom management and utilization of specialist palliative care in the early COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-site retrospective chart review\",\"authors\":\"Madelaine Baetz-Dougan, J. Guan, B. Henry, K. Stilos, Desmond D. Leung, Niren Shetty, Shruti Gupta, A. Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2023.2241784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: COVID-19 is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Previous work has described symptom management provided by specialists in palliative care for COVID-19 patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing primary level palliative care provided by general internal medicine teams or reasons for referral to specialists. Objective: Our aim was to describe and compare the following outcomes for patients dying of COVID-19: (1) symptom management by acute care providers and palliative care specialists, and (2) utilization of palliative care consultation across two acute care hospitals in Toronto, Ontario during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We undertook a retrospective chart review of 45 adult inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 23 January 2020 to 19 May 2020 who died, and/or those who had a palliative care consultation. Findings: Forty-one of the 45 patients died. Common symptoms were shortness of breath and agitation. For these symptoms, pharmacologic management was not significantly different for patients seen by palliative care compared to those without consultation. Most consultations were for end-of-life care. There were significantly more palliative care consults for COVID-19 patients at one hospital (P=.001). Conclusion: The findings highlight the significant discrepancy in involvement of specialist palliative care between settings. More research is needed to validate the initial findings from this small sample size, understand the needs of palliative care providers in this setting, and appreciate the factors influencing consultation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2023.2241784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2023.2241784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of symptom management and utilization of specialist palliative care in the early COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-site retrospective chart review
Background: COVID-19 is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Previous work has described symptom management provided by specialists in palliative care for COVID-19 patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing primary level palliative care provided by general internal medicine teams or reasons for referral to specialists. Objective: Our aim was to describe and compare the following outcomes for patients dying of COVID-19: (1) symptom management by acute care providers and palliative care specialists, and (2) utilization of palliative care consultation across two acute care hospitals in Toronto, Ontario during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We undertook a retrospective chart review of 45 adult inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 23 January 2020 to 19 May 2020 who died, and/or those who had a palliative care consultation. Findings: Forty-one of the 45 patients died. Common symptoms were shortness of breath and agitation. For these symptoms, pharmacologic management was not significantly different for patients seen by palliative care compared to those without consultation. Most consultations were for end-of-life care. There were significantly more palliative care consults for COVID-19 patients at one hospital (P=.001). Conclusion: The findings highlight the significant discrepancy in involvement of specialist palliative care between settings. More research is needed to validate the initial findings from this small sample size, understand the needs of palliative care providers in this setting, and appreciate the factors influencing consultation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信