西班牙科学教师教育者的准备、经验与科学教育中的科学本质观

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Antonio García-Carmona
{"title":"西班牙科学教师教育者的准备、经验与科学教育中的科学本质观","authors":"Antonio García-Carmona","doi":"10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The obstacles and difficulties that science teachers face when teaching the nature of science (NOS) are well-known. Nonetheless, little is known of what science teacher educators (STEs) know, do, and think about this issue. Thus, a study with 142 Spanish STEs was conducted. This was aimed at analysing (<i>i</i>) what preparation the STEs have to teach NOS, (<i>ii</i>) what educational experience they have about NOS, (<i>iii</i>) what importance they give to NOS in their training plans, (<i>iv</i>) when NOS should be taught, (<i>v</i>) how to integrate NOS in science education, (<i>vi</i>) how to teach NOS, (<i>vii</i>) what to teach about NOS, and (<i>viii</i>) the influences interconnecting the STEs’ preparation, experience, and opinions regarding NOS teaching. Among the results, it was found that most STEs state that they have ample knowledge of NOS, are well prepared pedagogically to teach it, and have extensive experience in teaching it. However, there was some mismatch between their stated preparation and their experience teaching NOS. In addition, they think that NOS should be taught from early ages and be treated as cross-cutting content in science education. They also consider that, when teaching NOS, an implicit approach is just as effective as an explicit-reflective one. As for their selection of NOS content to include, they are fundamentally divided into two groups — those who select only epistemic aspects of NOS and those who select a balanced proportion of both epistemic and non-epistemic aspects. The limitations of the study are reported along with the issues that require further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"31 3","pages":"685 - 711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spanish Science Teacher Educators’ Preparation, Experiences, and Views About Nature of Science in Science Education\",\"authors\":\"Antonio García-Carmona\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The obstacles and difficulties that science teachers face when teaching the nature of science (NOS) are well-known. Nonetheless, little is known of what science teacher educators (STEs) know, do, and think about this issue. Thus, a study with 142 Spanish STEs was conducted. This was aimed at analysing (<i>i</i>) what preparation the STEs have to teach NOS, (<i>ii</i>) what educational experience they have about NOS, (<i>iii</i>) what importance they give to NOS in their training plans, (<i>iv</i>) when NOS should be taught, (<i>v</i>) how to integrate NOS in science education, (<i>vi</i>) how to teach NOS, (<i>vii</i>) what to teach about NOS, and (<i>viii</i>) the influences interconnecting the STEs’ preparation, experience, and opinions regarding NOS teaching. Among the results, it was found that most STEs state that they have ample knowledge of NOS, are well prepared pedagogically to teach it, and have extensive experience in teaching it. However, there was some mismatch between their stated preparation and their experience teaching NOS. In addition, they think that NOS should be taught from early ages and be treated as cross-cutting content in science education. They also consider that, when teaching NOS, an implicit approach is just as effective as an explicit-reflective one. As for their selection of NOS content to include, they are fundamentally divided into two groups — those who select only epistemic aspects of NOS and those who select a balanced proportion of both epistemic and non-epistemic aspects. The limitations of the study are reported along with the issues that require further research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"685 - 711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00263-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

科学教师在科学本质教学中所面临的障碍和困难是众所周知的。然而,科学教师教育者(STEs)对这个问题的了解、行动和思考却很少。因此,对142名西班牙STEs进行了一项研究。研究的目的是分析(i)科学技术人员教授自然科学的准备工作,(ii)他们有什么关于自然科学的教育经验,(iii)他们在培训计划中对自然科学的重视程度,(iv)什么时候应该教授自然科学,(v)如何将自然科学纳入科学教育,(vi)如何教授自然科学,(vii)如何教授自然科学,以及(viii)科学技术人员的准备工作、经验和对自然科学教学的意见之间的相互影响。调查结果显示,大多数教师表示他们对NOS有丰富的知识,在教学上做好了充分的准备,并且有丰富的教学经验。然而,他们所陈述的准备工作与他们教学自然科学的经验并不相符。此外,他们认为自然科学应从小开始教授,并应作为科学教育的跨领域内容。他们还认为,在教授NOS时,隐性方法与显性反思方法同样有效。至于他们对NOS内容的选择,他们基本上分为两组,一组只选择NOS的认知方面,另一组选择认知和非认知方面的平衡比例。报告了本研究的局限性以及需要进一步研究的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spanish Science Teacher Educators’ Preparation, Experiences, and Views About Nature of Science in Science Education

The obstacles and difficulties that science teachers face when teaching the nature of science (NOS) are well-known. Nonetheless, little is known of what science teacher educators (STEs) know, do, and think about this issue. Thus, a study with 142 Spanish STEs was conducted. This was aimed at analysing (i) what preparation the STEs have to teach NOS, (ii) what educational experience they have about NOS, (iii) what importance they give to NOS in their training plans, (iv) when NOS should be taught, (v) how to integrate NOS in science education, (vi) how to teach NOS, (vii) what to teach about NOS, and (viii) the influences interconnecting the STEs’ preparation, experience, and opinions regarding NOS teaching. Among the results, it was found that most STEs state that they have ample knowledge of NOS, are well prepared pedagogically to teach it, and have extensive experience in teaching it. However, there was some mismatch between their stated preparation and their experience teaching NOS. In addition, they think that NOS should be taught from early ages and be treated as cross-cutting content in science education. They also consider that, when teaching NOS, an implicit approach is just as effective as an explicit-reflective one. As for their selection of NOS content to include, they are fundamentally divided into two groups — those who select only epistemic aspects of NOS and those who select a balanced proportion of both epistemic and non-epistemic aspects. The limitations of the study are reported along with the issues that require further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信