对明斯基金融不稳定假说的友好批判

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Wesley C. Marshall
{"title":"对明斯基金融不稳定假说的友好批判","authors":"Wesley C. Marshall","doi":"10.1080/08911916.2021.2001248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article critiques Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis, arguing that fraud is a missing element in his theory and the central element in the speculative bubbles that caused “it” to happen twice in the last century in the United States.","PeriodicalId":44784,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":"50 1","pages":"257 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Friendly Critique of Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Wesley C. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08911916.2021.2001248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article critiques Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis, arguing that fraud is a missing element in his theory and the central element in the speculative bubbles that caused “it” to happen twice in the last century in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"257 - 271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.2001248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.2001248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对明斯基的金融不稳定假说进行了批判,认为欺诈是他的理论中缺失的一个因素,也是导致上个世纪美国两次发生“金融不稳定假说”的投机泡沫的核心因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Friendly Critique of Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis
Abstract This article critiques Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis, arguing that fraud is a missing element in his theory and the central element in the speculative bubbles that caused “it” to happen twice in the last century in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信