新冠肺炎大流行期间,处于悲惨空间的难民、旷日持久的“等待”和遗弃的空间性

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Paul Moawad, Lauren Andres
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间,处于悲惨空间的难民、旷日持久的“等待”和遗弃的空间性","authors":"Paul Moawad, Lauren Andres","doi":"10.1080/14649365.2022.2121980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper engages with a reinterpretation of the concept of abject space situating it within abjection theory and the concept of ‘waiting’. It develops further the term of ‘spatialities of abjection’ and discusses how the complex relationality occurring in abjection manifests in various spaces, through porous, changing, invisible boundaries but also specific temporal conditions. Doing so allows us to unpack the transformations of the abject space alternatively and simultaneously considered as a refuge and as a place of danger, factor of contamination. More importantly, the paper situates the reading of spatial abjection through a temporal lens, denoting how abject subjects are spatialized in a context of ‘political waiting’ but more importantly in a situation where active ‘waiting’ re-shifted to passive ‘waiting’ because of the pandemic implications. To do so, we focus on the spatialities of abjection affecting Syrian refugees living in informal tented settlements (ITSs) in Lebanon during the COVID-19 crisis. While abjection, stigma and xenophobia were already occurring prior to 2019, ITSs as abject spaces and refugees as abject subjects were targeted by supplemented rules and control. Those led to more controlled encampments and immobilization, increasing their dependency and reliance on international aid.","PeriodicalId":48072,"journal":{"name":"Social & Cultural Geography","volume":"24 1","pages":"467 - 483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refugees in abject spaces, protracted ‘waiting’ and spatialities of abjection during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Paul Moawad, Lauren Andres\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649365.2022.2121980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper engages with a reinterpretation of the concept of abject space situating it within abjection theory and the concept of ‘waiting’. It develops further the term of ‘spatialities of abjection’ and discusses how the complex relationality occurring in abjection manifests in various spaces, through porous, changing, invisible boundaries but also specific temporal conditions. Doing so allows us to unpack the transformations of the abject space alternatively and simultaneously considered as a refuge and as a place of danger, factor of contamination. More importantly, the paper situates the reading of spatial abjection through a temporal lens, denoting how abject subjects are spatialized in a context of ‘political waiting’ but more importantly in a situation where active ‘waiting’ re-shifted to passive ‘waiting’ because of the pandemic implications. To do so, we focus on the spatialities of abjection affecting Syrian refugees living in informal tented settlements (ITSs) in Lebanon during the COVID-19 crisis. While abjection, stigma and xenophobia were already occurring prior to 2019, ITSs as abject spaces and refugees as abject subjects were targeted by supplemented rules and control. Those led to more controlled encampments and immobilization, increasing their dependency and reliance on international aid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social & Cultural Geography\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"467 - 483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social & Cultural Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2121980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2121980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从落魄理论和“等待”的概念出发,重新阐释了落魄空间的概念。它进一步发展了“落差的空间性”这一术语,并讨论了落差中发生的复杂关系如何通过多孔的、变化的、看不见的边界以及特定的时间条件在各种空间中表现出来。这样做可以让我们解开这个可怜的空间的转换,同时被认为是一个避难所,一个危险的地方,一个污染的因素。更重要的是,这篇论文通过时间透镜来定位对空间落寞的解读,表明了落寞的主体是如何在“政治等待”的背景下被空间化的,但更重要的是,在这种情况下,由于大流行的影响,主动的“等待”重新转变为被动的“等待”。为此,我们重点关注2019冠状病毒病危机期间生活在黎巴嫩非正式帐篷安置点(ITSs)的叙利亚难民的落差空间。虽然在2019年之前就已经出现了落贱、耻辱和仇外心理,但作为落贱空间的ITSs和作为落贱主体的难民,又成为了补充规则和控制的目标。这些冲突导致营地受到更严格的控制和封锁,增加了他们对国际援助的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refugees in abject spaces, protracted ‘waiting’ and spatialities of abjection during the COVID-19 pandemic
ABSTRACT This paper engages with a reinterpretation of the concept of abject space situating it within abjection theory and the concept of ‘waiting’. It develops further the term of ‘spatialities of abjection’ and discusses how the complex relationality occurring in abjection manifests in various spaces, through porous, changing, invisible boundaries but also specific temporal conditions. Doing so allows us to unpack the transformations of the abject space alternatively and simultaneously considered as a refuge and as a place of danger, factor of contamination. More importantly, the paper situates the reading of spatial abjection through a temporal lens, denoting how abject subjects are spatialized in a context of ‘political waiting’ but more importantly in a situation where active ‘waiting’ re-shifted to passive ‘waiting’ because of the pandemic implications. To do so, we focus on the spatialities of abjection affecting Syrian refugees living in informal tented settlements (ITSs) in Lebanon during the COVID-19 crisis. While abjection, stigma and xenophobia were already occurring prior to 2019, ITSs as abject spaces and refugees as abject subjects were targeted by supplemented rules and control. Those led to more controlled encampments and immobilization, increasing their dependency and reliance on international aid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
99
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信