广义距离协方差与Hilbert–Schmidt独立性准则的回归分析

IF 3.9 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Dominic Edelmann, J. Goeman
{"title":"广义距离协方差与Hilbert–Schmidt独立性准则的回归分析","authors":"Dominic Edelmann, J. Goeman","doi":"10.1214/21-sts841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a seminal paper, Sejdinovic, et al. [49] showed the equivalence of the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) [20] and a generalization of distance covariance [62]. In this paper the two notions of dependence are unified with a third prominent concept for independence testing, the “global test” introduced in [16]. The new viewpoint provides novel insights into all three test traditions, as well as a unified overall view of the way all three tests contrast with classical association tests. As our main result, a regression perspective on HSIC and generalized distance covariance is obtained, allowing such tests to be used with nuisance covariates or for survival data. Several more examples of cross-fertilization of the three traditions are provided, involving theoretical results and novel methodology. To illustrate the difference between classical statistical tests and the unified HSIC/distance covariance/global tests we investigate the case of association between two categorical variables in depth.","PeriodicalId":51172,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Regression Perspective on Generalized Distance Covariance and the Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Edelmann, J. Goeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/21-sts841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a seminal paper, Sejdinovic, et al. [49] showed the equivalence of the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) [20] and a generalization of distance covariance [62]. In this paper the two notions of dependence are unified with a third prominent concept for independence testing, the “global test” introduced in [16]. The new viewpoint provides novel insights into all three test traditions, as well as a unified overall view of the way all three tests contrast with classical association tests. As our main result, a regression perspective on HSIC and generalized distance covariance is obtained, allowing such tests to be used with nuisance covariates or for survival data. Several more examples of cross-fertilization of the three traditions are provided, involving theoretical results and novel methodology. To illustrate the difference between classical statistical tests and the unified HSIC/distance covariance/global tests we investigate the case of association between two categorical variables in depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/21-sts841\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Science","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/21-sts841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Sejdinovic等人[49]在一篇开创性的论文中展示了希尔伯特-施密特独立性准则(HSIC)[20]的等价性和距离协方差的推广[62]。在本文中,依赖性的两个概念与独立性测试的第三个突出概念相统一,即[16]中引入的“全局测试”。这一新观点为所有三种测试传统提供了新颖的见解,并对所有三种考试与经典联想测试的对比方式提供了统一的整体观点。作为我们的主要结果,获得了HSIC和广义距离协方差的回归观点,允许将此类测试与干扰协变量或生存数据一起使用。文中还列举了三种传统相互融合的实例,包括理论成果和新颖的方法论。为了说明经典统计检验和统一的HSIC/距离协方差/全局检验之间的差异,我们深入研究了两个分类变量之间的关联情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Regression Perspective on Generalized Distance Covariance and the Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion
In a seminal paper, Sejdinovic, et al. [49] showed the equivalence of the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) [20] and a generalization of distance covariance [62]. In this paper the two notions of dependence are unified with a third prominent concept for independence testing, the “global test” introduced in [16]. The new viewpoint provides novel insights into all three test traditions, as well as a unified overall view of the way all three tests contrast with classical association tests. As our main result, a regression perspective on HSIC and generalized distance covariance is obtained, allowing such tests to be used with nuisance covariates or for survival data. Several more examples of cross-fertilization of the three traditions are provided, involving theoretical results and novel methodology. To illustrate the difference between classical statistical tests and the unified HSIC/distance covariance/global tests we investigate the case of association between two categorical variables in depth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Science
Statistical Science 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The central purpose of Statistical Science is to convey the richness, breadth and unity of the field by presenting the full range of contemporary statistical thought at a moderate technical level, accessible to the wide community of practitioners, researchers and students of statistics and probability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信