斯雷布雷尼察母亲等人的公平审判:猜测作为一种推理形式

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Zane Ratniece
{"title":"斯雷布雷尼察母亲等人的公平审判:猜测作为一种推理形式","authors":"Zane Ratniece","doi":"10.5334/ujiel.547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 19 July 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) rendered the final judgment in the proceedings led by Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica (‘Mothers’), a foundation established under the Dutch law, in the interests of more than 6,000 surviving relatives of the Srebrenica genocide. Mothers and ten individual plaintiffs alleged multiple failures by the Dutch State regarding the fall of the Srebrenica safe area designated by the United Nations (‘UN’) and the fate of more than 30,000 people who had fled to either a nearby compound of the Dutch battalion or other locations, including about 7,000 Bosniac males. However, the Supreme Court established the State’s responsibility only regarding a group of approximately 350 males who had been allowed inside the Dutchbat compound but were then handed over to the Bosnian Serbs. This contribution examines from the perspective of the right to fair trial how the courts determined the State’s liability for damages in relation to these males. It questions whether the parties to the proceedings had an opportunity to present their arguments on facts and evidence as to a percentage of the State’s liability for damages. It also views the Supreme Court’s determination of the liability at 10% as problematic.","PeriodicalId":30606,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Journal of International and European Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair Trial in Mothers of Srebrenica et al.: Guessing as a Form of Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Zane Ratniece\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ujiel.547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 19 July 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) rendered the final judgment in the proceedings led by Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica (‘Mothers’), a foundation established under the Dutch law, in the interests of more than 6,000 surviving relatives of the Srebrenica genocide. Mothers and ten individual plaintiffs alleged multiple failures by the Dutch State regarding the fall of the Srebrenica safe area designated by the United Nations (‘UN’) and the fate of more than 30,000 people who had fled to either a nearby compound of the Dutch battalion or other locations, including about 7,000 Bosniac males. However, the Supreme Court established the State’s responsibility only regarding a group of approximately 350 males who had been allowed inside the Dutchbat compound but were then handed over to the Bosnian Serbs. This contribution examines from the perspective of the right to fair trial how the courts determined the State’s liability for damages in relation to these males. It questions whether the parties to the proceedings had an opportunity to present their arguments on facts and evidence as to a percentage of the State’s liability for damages. It also views the Supreme Court’s determination of the liability at 10% as problematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utrecht Journal of International and European Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utrecht Journal of International and European Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Journal of International and European Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年7月19日,荷兰最高法院(Hoge Raad)对斯雷布雷尼察母亲基金会('母亲')为斯雷布雷尼察种族灭绝的6000多名幸存亲属的利益发起的诉讼作出了最终判决。该基金会是根据荷兰法律成立的。母亲们和十名个人原告指控荷兰政府多次失职,导致联合国指定的斯雷布雷尼察安全区失守,导致3万多人的命运,这些人逃到荷兰营附近的一个院落或其他地点,其中包括大约7 000名波斯尼亚男子。但是,最高法院只规定了国家对一群大约350名男子的责任,他们被允许进入荷兰巴特大院,但随后被移交给波斯尼亚塞族。这篇文章从公平审判权的角度探讨了法院如何确定国家对这些男性的损害赔偿责任。委员会质疑诉讼各方是否有机会就事实和证据就国家赔偿损害责任的百分比提出论点。它还认为最高法院对10%的赔偿责任的判定是有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fair Trial in Mothers of Srebrenica et al.: Guessing as a Form of Reasoning
On 19 July 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) rendered the final judgment in the proceedings led by Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica (‘Mothers’), a foundation established under the Dutch law, in the interests of more than 6,000 surviving relatives of the Srebrenica genocide. Mothers and ten individual plaintiffs alleged multiple failures by the Dutch State regarding the fall of the Srebrenica safe area designated by the United Nations (‘UN’) and the fate of more than 30,000 people who had fled to either a nearby compound of the Dutch battalion or other locations, including about 7,000 Bosniac males. However, the Supreme Court established the State’s responsibility only regarding a group of approximately 350 males who had been allowed inside the Dutchbat compound but were then handed over to the Bosnian Serbs. This contribution examines from the perspective of the right to fair trial how the courts determined the State’s liability for damages in relation to these males. It questions whether the parties to the proceedings had an opportunity to present their arguments on facts and evidence as to a percentage of the State’s liability for damages. It also views the Supreme Court’s determination of the liability at 10% as problematic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信