0.25%阿尔卡他定与0.2%盐酸奥洛帕坦治疗三级医院过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性比较研究

Akilandeswari Krishnan, C. Jayanthi, Sriya Sridhar
{"title":"0.25%阿尔卡他定与0.2%盐酸奥洛帕坦治疗三级医院过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性比较研究","authors":"Akilandeswari Krishnan, C. Jayanthi, Sriya Sridhar","doi":"10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling, and chemosis. Alcaftadine and olopatadine hydrochloride are classified as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Settings and Design: Ophthalmology outpatient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted among 120 patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic conjunctivitis and efficacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using Total Ocular Symptoms Score (TOSS) and Conjunctival Hyperemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired t-test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by Chi-square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic relief in the Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A significant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks in alcaftadine treated group compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (P < 0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation, and mild redness in both groups. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.","PeriodicalId":32483,"journal":{"name":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"34 1","pages":"227 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis at a tertiary care hospital\",\"authors\":\"Akilandeswari Krishnan, C. Jayanthi, Sriya Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling, and chemosis. Alcaftadine and olopatadine hydrochloride are classified as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Settings and Design: Ophthalmology outpatient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted among 120 patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic conjunctivitis and efficacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using Total Ocular Symptoms Score (TOSS) and Conjunctival Hyperemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired t-test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by Chi-square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic relief in the Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A significant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks in alcaftadine treated group compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (P < 0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation, and mild redness in both groups. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"227 - 233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_185_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼部瘙痒是过敏性结膜炎的标志性症状,伴有撕裂、结膜发红、眼睑肿胀和化学性水肿。Alcaftadine和olopatadine盐酸盐被归类为双作用抗过敏剂,用于治疗过敏性结膜炎。目的:比较0.25%阿尔卡他定和0.2%盐酸奥洛帕定滴眼液治疗过敏性结膜炎的疗效和安全性。设置和设计:班加罗尔医学院和研究所明托眼科医院眼科门诊部;前瞻性、随机、比较研究。受试者和方法:本研究在120名3级过敏性结膜炎患者中进行,并使用总眼部症状评分(TOSS)和结膜充血量表,根据基线至2周3级至0级过敏性眼部体征和症状症状缓解的患者比例来衡量疗效。通过监测治疗突发的不良反应来评估安全性。通过非配对、配对t检验和重复测量ANOVA评估的连续数据和通过卡方检验评估的分类数据。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义,而<0.001被认为具有高度意义。结果:与盐酸奥洛帕坦组(90%)相比,Alcaftadine组在2周结束时症状缓解的患者比例更大(98.3%)。与盐酸奥洛帕定组相比,从基线到2周,观察到阿尔卡他定治疗组的TOSS评分显著且更快地降低(P<0.05)。两组报告的不良事件均为头痛、烧灼感和轻度发红。结论:从基线到2周,0.25%的Alcaftadine在减少过敏性结膜炎的眼部体征和症状方面表现出更大的疗效,而0.2%的盐酸奥洛帕定具有最小的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis at a tertiary care hospital
Background: Ocular itching is the hallmark symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, accompanied by tearing, conjunctival redness, eyelid swelling, and chemosis. Alcaftadine and olopatadine hydrochloride are classified as dual-acting antiallergic agents, used in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: The aim is to compare the efficacy and safety of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% eye drops among patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Settings and Design: Ophthalmology outpatient department at Minto Ophthalmic Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru; prospective, randomized, comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study was conducted among 120 patients suffering from grade 3 Allergic conjunctivitis and efficacy measured in terms of proportion of patients achieving symptomatic relief of allergic ocular signs and symptoms from grade 3 to grade 0 from baseline to 2 weeks, using Total Ocular Symptoms Score (TOSS) and Conjunctival Hyperemia scale. Safety assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse effects. Continuous data assessed by unpaired, paired t-test and repeated measures-ANOVA and categorical data by Chi-square test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Greater proportion of patients achieved symptomatic relief in the Alcaftadine group (98.3%) compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (90%) at end of 2 weeks. A significant and faster reduction in TOSS score was observed from baseline to 2 weeks in alcaftadine treated group compared to the olopatadine hydrochloride group (P < 0.05). Adverse events reported were headache, burning sensation, and mild redness in both groups. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing ocular signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis from baseline to 2 weeks, compared to olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% with minimal side-effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信