《地图中的时间:从发现时代到我们的数字时代》,Kären Wigen和Caroline Winter编辑(评论)

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Steven Seegel
{"title":"《地图中的时间:从发现时代到我们的数字时代》,Kären Wigen和Caroline Winter编辑(评论)","authors":"Steven Seegel","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time leaves dust on every map. If we agree that maps depict time over a limited arc, never in the same way, one arrives at a quandary of loose social constructionism or relativism for their study. Conceptually as tools, however, maps are not reducible to calendars or clocks, atlases or almanacs. Maps show traffic and movement, change over time. They do not fix a person or a country’s identity, or move time forward in a story of progress, mastery or conquest. Nor are they modern: maps are not all drawn to scale or with grids, not in the same manner. Time is a part of history, but history is just one variable. Time maps are constructs that represent the unstable; time can precede space; time can be out of place. Hence the nature of the book’s inquiry into symbolic design and representation. The aim of this beautifully produced volume, based on a 2017 conference at Stanford University’s David RumseyMap Center, is to offer a fresh digital-age approach to buried space-time propositions, assumptions, and frames for specific moments and cultures. Readers explore visually saturated “wheres” in which maps are temporal idioms, metaphors, and representations of an era and a place produced. The book curates time rhythms, often against the grain. Can one do serious forensic study of time in maps, without nostalgia for the artefact? Rather than separating an analog age from a twenty-first","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"33 1","pages":"169 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time in Maps: From the Age of Discovery to Our Digital Era ed. by Kären Wigen and Caroline Winterer (review)\",\"authors\":\"Steven Seegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jwh.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Time leaves dust on every map. If we agree that maps depict time over a limited arc, never in the same way, one arrives at a quandary of loose social constructionism or relativism for their study. Conceptually as tools, however, maps are not reducible to calendars or clocks, atlases or almanacs. Maps show traffic and movement, change over time. They do not fix a person or a country’s identity, or move time forward in a story of progress, mastery or conquest. Nor are they modern: maps are not all drawn to scale or with grids, not in the same manner. Time is a part of history, but history is just one variable. Time maps are constructs that represent the unstable; time can precede space; time can be out of place. Hence the nature of the book’s inquiry into symbolic design and representation. The aim of this beautifully produced volume, based on a 2017 conference at Stanford University’s David RumseyMap Center, is to offer a fresh digital-age approach to buried space-time propositions, assumptions, and frames for specific moments and cultures. Readers explore visually saturated “wheres” in which maps are temporal idioms, metaphors, and representations of an era and a place produced. The book curates time rhythms, often against the grain. Can one do serious forensic study of time in maps, without nostalgia for the artefact? Rather than separating an analog age from a twenty-first\",\"PeriodicalId\":17466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World History\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"169 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2022.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

时间在每张地图上都留下了灰尘。如果我们同意地图在有限的弧线上描绘时间,而不是以同样的方式,那么人们就会在研究中陷入松散的社会建构主义或相对主义的困境。然而,从概念上讲,地图并不能简化为日历或时钟、地图册或年鉴。地图显示交通和移动,随时间变化。它们不会固定一个人或一个国家的身份,也不会在一个进步、掌握或征服的故事中让时间向前推移。它们也不是现代的:地图并不是都按比例绘制或用网格绘制,也不是以同样的方式绘制的。时间是历史的一部分,但历史只是一个变量。时间图是表示不稳定的结构;时间可以先于空间;时间可能不合时宜。因此,本书对象征性设计和表现的探索具有本质意义。这本制作精美的书基于2017年在斯坦福大学David RumseyMap中心举行的一次会议,其目的是为特定时刻和文化提供一种新的数字时代方法,以解决隐藏的时空命题、假设和框架。读者探索视觉饱和的“何处”,其中地图是时间习语、隐喻,以及对一个时代和一个地方产生的表征。这本书精心安排了时间节奏,常常是违背常理的。一个人能对地图中的时间进行认真的法医学研究,而不怀念这件艺术品吗?而不是将模拟时代与二十一世纪分开
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time in Maps: From the Age of Discovery to Our Digital Era ed. by Kären Wigen and Caroline Winterer (review)
Time leaves dust on every map. If we agree that maps depict time over a limited arc, never in the same way, one arrives at a quandary of loose social constructionism or relativism for their study. Conceptually as tools, however, maps are not reducible to calendars or clocks, atlases or almanacs. Maps show traffic and movement, change over time. They do not fix a person or a country’s identity, or move time forward in a story of progress, mastery or conquest. Nor are they modern: maps are not all drawn to scale or with grids, not in the same manner. Time is a part of history, but history is just one variable. Time maps are constructs that represent the unstable; time can precede space; time can be out of place. Hence the nature of the book’s inquiry into symbolic design and representation. The aim of this beautifully produced volume, based on a 2017 conference at Stanford University’s David RumseyMap Center, is to offer a fresh digital-age approach to buried space-time propositions, assumptions, and frames for specific moments and cultures. Readers explore visually saturated “wheres” in which maps are temporal idioms, metaphors, and representations of an era and a place produced. The book curates time rhythms, often against the grain. Can one do serious forensic study of time in maps, without nostalgia for the artefact? Rather than separating an analog age from a twenty-first
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信