房地产的极端问题

Lynda L. Butler
{"title":"房地产的极端问题","authors":"Lynda L. Butler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3277500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western-style property systems are ill-equipped to deal with extremes—extreme poverty, extreme wealth, extreme environmental harm. Though they can effectively handle many problems, the current systems are inherently incapable of providing the types of reform needed to address extreme situations that are straining the fabric of societies—situations that are stressing the integrity of core societal and natural systems to the breaking point. The American property system, in particular, is problematic. The system has a long tradition of strong individual rights and relies primarily on the efficiency norm to operate and shape the incentives of rights holders. The economic model that now dominates the American property system cannot, on its own, make the reforms needed to address problems of extremes. The assumption of a rational property owner and the individual scale of decision-making create an intrinsically self-serving system that will not, without redirection, force individual owners to consider important, outside interests or internalize serious, long-term externalities. Constitutional protection of property, with its increasingly economic focus, reinforces the owner-centric approach. \n \nYet property systems are fundamentally important to free and secure societies. Strong property rights protect the autonomy of individuals against government and third-party infringement. They also promote economic activities, rewarding investment and labor. A strong property system, in other words, provides a way to order a society and its resources by establishing a framework for allocating, distributing, and managing interests in the resources. This framework includes organizational and operating principles that enable the society’s economic and political systems to work on a daily basis. \n \nThis Article focuses on property’s problem with extremes by asking whether it is possible to have a property system that both protects individual rights and sustains the integrity of the earth system. Because of its global scale and potentially disastrous impacts, climate change provides the ultimate lens for examining property’s ability to handle extremes. Climate change is a problem that affects the whole regardless of the contributions of the part. It is a problem that needs solutions from the whole but can benefit from the responsiveness of the part. In order for Western property systems to operate in ways that minimize property’s adverse effects on the earth and on humans, some fundamental rewiring of property’s incentive structure and operating rules must occur.","PeriodicalId":83479,"journal":{"name":"Wake Forest law review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property's Problem with Extremes\",\"authors\":\"Lynda L. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3277500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Western-style property systems are ill-equipped to deal with extremes—extreme poverty, extreme wealth, extreme environmental harm. Though they can effectively handle many problems, the current systems are inherently incapable of providing the types of reform needed to address extreme situations that are straining the fabric of societies—situations that are stressing the integrity of core societal and natural systems to the breaking point. The American property system, in particular, is problematic. The system has a long tradition of strong individual rights and relies primarily on the efficiency norm to operate and shape the incentives of rights holders. The economic model that now dominates the American property system cannot, on its own, make the reforms needed to address problems of extremes. The assumption of a rational property owner and the individual scale of decision-making create an intrinsically self-serving system that will not, without redirection, force individual owners to consider important, outside interests or internalize serious, long-term externalities. Constitutional protection of property, with its increasingly economic focus, reinforces the owner-centric approach. \\n \\nYet property systems are fundamentally important to free and secure societies. Strong property rights protect the autonomy of individuals against government and third-party infringement. They also promote economic activities, rewarding investment and labor. A strong property system, in other words, provides a way to order a society and its resources by establishing a framework for allocating, distributing, and managing interests in the resources. This framework includes organizational and operating principles that enable the society’s economic and political systems to work on a daily basis. \\n \\nThis Article focuses on property’s problem with extremes by asking whether it is possible to have a property system that both protects individual rights and sustains the integrity of the earth system. Because of its global scale and potentially disastrous impacts, climate change provides the ultimate lens for examining property’s ability to handle extremes. Climate change is a problem that affects the whole regardless of the contributions of the part. It is a problem that needs solutions from the whole but can benefit from the responsiveness of the part. In order for Western property systems to operate in ways that minimize property’s adverse effects on the earth and on humans, some fundamental rewiring of property’s incentive structure and operating rules must occur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wake Forest law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

西方式的房地产系统不具备应对极端情况的能力——极端贫困、极端财富、极端环境危害。尽管它们可以有效地处理许多问题,但当前的制度本质上无法提供解决社会结构紧张的极端情况所需的改革类型,这种情况将核心社会和自然制度的完整性强调到了崩溃的地步。尤其是美国的房地产制度存在问题。该制度有着强大的个人权利的悠久传统,主要依靠效率规范来运作和塑造权利持有人的激励机制。目前主导美国房地产系统的经济模式本身无法进行解决极端问题所需的改革。理性产权所有人的假设和个人决策规模创造了一个本质上自我服务的系统,如果不重新定向,不会迫使个人所有人考虑重要的外部利益或将严重的长期外部性内化。宪法对财产的保护越来越注重经济,强化了以业主为中心的方法。然而,财产制度对自由和安全的社会至关重要。强大的产权保护个人的自主权,使其免受政府和第三方的侵犯。它们还促进经济活动,奖励投资和劳动力。换言之,强大的财产制度通过建立分配、分配和管理资源利益的框架,提供了一种秩序社会及其资源的方式。该框架包括组织和运作原则,使社会的经济和政治制度能够在日常工作中发挥作用。这篇文章聚焦于财产的极端问题,询问是否有可能建立一个既保护个人权利又维持地球系统完整性的财产制度。由于其全球规模和潜在的灾难性影响,气候变化为检验房地产应对极端情况的能力提供了终极视角。气候变化是一个影响整体的问题,无论部分的贡献如何。这是一个需要从整体上解决的问题,但可以从部分的响应中受益。为了使西方财产制度的运作方式最大限度地减少财产对地球和人类的不利影响,必须对财产的激励结构和运作规则进行一些根本性的重新布线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Property's Problem with Extremes
Western-style property systems are ill-equipped to deal with extremes—extreme poverty, extreme wealth, extreme environmental harm. Though they can effectively handle many problems, the current systems are inherently incapable of providing the types of reform needed to address extreme situations that are straining the fabric of societies—situations that are stressing the integrity of core societal and natural systems to the breaking point. The American property system, in particular, is problematic. The system has a long tradition of strong individual rights and relies primarily on the efficiency norm to operate and shape the incentives of rights holders. The economic model that now dominates the American property system cannot, on its own, make the reforms needed to address problems of extremes. The assumption of a rational property owner and the individual scale of decision-making create an intrinsically self-serving system that will not, without redirection, force individual owners to consider important, outside interests or internalize serious, long-term externalities. Constitutional protection of property, with its increasingly economic focus, reinforces the owner-centric approach. Yet property systems are fundamentally important to free and secure societies. Strong property rights protect the autonomy of individuals against government and third-party infringement. They also promote economic activities, rewarding investment and labor. A strong property system, in other words, provides a way to order a society and its resources by establishing a framework for allocating, distributing, and managing interests in the resources. This framework includes organizational and operating principles that enable the society’s economic and political systems to work on a daily basis. This Article focuses on property’s problem with extremes by asking whether it is possible to have a property system that both protects individual rights and sustains the integrity of the earth system. Because of its global scale and potentially disastrous impacts, climate change provides the ultimate lens for examining property’s ability to handle extremes. Climate change is a problem that affects the whole regardless of the contributions of the part. It is a problem that needs solutions from the whole but can benefit from the responsiveness of the part. In order for Western property systems to operate in ways that minimize property’s adverse effects on the earth and on humans, some fundamental rewiring of property’s incentive structure and operating rules must occur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信