编辑

Q2 Social Sciences
K. Hassall, A. Gullickson, A. Boyce, Kelly M Hannum
{"title":"编辑","authors":"K. Hassall, A. Gullickson, A. Boyce, Kelly M Hannum","doi":"10.1177/1035719X20931250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“So what harm would be done if evaluators ignored values? In one sense, no harm would be done, because evaluations would still have values implicit in them. Values inevitably permeate the selection of independent and dependent variables, the choice of questions and stakeholders, and the social and political context from which many evaluations arise. Evaluators cannot avoid values even if they try. But in another sense, real harm is done if evaluators deal with values naively or poorly through their implicit choices.” Shadish, 1994, p. 35","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"20 1","pages":"63 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X20931250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"K. Hassall, A. Gullickson, A. Boyce, Kelly M Hannum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1035719X20931250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“So what harm would be done if evaluators ignored values? In one sense, no harm would be done, because evaluations would still have values implicit in them. Values inevitably permeate the selection of independent and dependent variables, the choice of questions and stakeholders, and the social and political context from which many evaluations arise. Evaluators cannot avoid values even if they try. But in another sense, real harm is done if evaluators deal with values naively or poorly through their implicit choices.” Shadish, 1994, p. 35\",\"PeriodicalId\":37231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X20931250\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X20931250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X20931250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“那么,如果评估者忽略了价值观,又会造成什么伤害呢?”从某种意义上说,不会造成任何伤害,因为评估仍然隐含着价值。价值观不可避免地渗透到自变量和因变量的选择、问题和利益相关者的选择以及产生许多评价的社会和政治背景中。评估者即使尝试也无法避免价值。但从另一种意义上说,如果评估者通过他们的隐性选择天真或糟糕地处理价值观,就会造成真正的伤害。”沙迪什,1994年,第35页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial
“So what harm would be done if evaluators ignored values? In one sense, no harm would be done, because evaluations would still have values implicit in them. Values inevitably permeate the selection of independent and dependent variables, the choice of questions and stakeholders, and the social and political context from which many evaluations arise. Evaluators cannot avoid values even if they try. But in another sense, real harm is done if evaluators deal with values naively or poorly through their implicit choices.” Shadish, 1994, p. 35
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信