离子浓度和类型对页岩稳定性影响的实验分析:稀盐溶液与浓盐溶液

IF 1.5 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Alkhaldi, T. Al-Bazali
{"title":"离子浓度和类型对页岩稳定性影响的实验分析:稀盐溶液与浓盐溶液","authors":"M. Alkhaldi, T. Al-Bazali","doi":"10.1080/12269328.2023.2227181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wellbore instability in shale formations is one of the most bothersome problems leading to significant changes in shale’s petrophysical, mechanical, and chemical properties, and could cost billions of dollars annually. Drilling fluid’s ionic composition is one of the factors affecting wellbore stability. This paper investigates the impact of chemical osmosis, ionic diffusion, and diffusion osmosis on the stability of shale, identify the critical salt concentration, and examine the impact of ionic type and concentration on shale’s stability. Experimental methods include utilisation of two different shale cores (I and II), in which each core is cut into several samples, to conduct linear expansion and gravimetric measurement tests using different salt solutions (KCl, NaCl, and CaCl2) of various salt concentrations. Results show that the critical salt concentrations of shale I and II is 8 w/w%. Chemical osmosis is found to be a reliable method for water extraction out of shale if the critical salt concentration value is not surpassed. Beyond this value, ionic diffusion and diffusion osmosis in shale I and II were adversely affecting shale’s stability through swelling. The swelling and gravimetric ions and water uptake tests showed that shale is a leaky semi-permeable membrane, and that chemical osmosis could be jeopardised by ionic transport into shale. In this study, the cation type (Na+, K+, Ca+2) that makes up the salt was varied. The impact of cation type on the stability of shale was clear as the anion type was fixed. Since both cations and anions tend to diffuse into shale in the presence of a concentration gradient, it is proposed for future work to study the combined impact of cation and anion types on shale’s stability by varying the anion and cation types.","PeriodicalId":12714,"journal":{"name":"Geosystem Engineering","volume":"26 1","pages":"129 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental analysis of the impact of ionic concentration and type on shale’s stability: dilute vs. concentrated salt solutions\",\"authors\":\"M. Alkhaldi, T. Al-Bazali\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12269328.2023.2227181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Wellbore instability in shale formations is one of the most bothersome problems leading to significant changes in shale’s petrophysical, mechanical, and chemical properties, and could cost billions of dollars annually. Drilling fluid’s ionic composition is one of the factors affecting wellbore stability. This paper investigates the impact of chemical osmosis, ionic diffusion, and diffusion osmosis on the stability of shale, identify the critical salt concentration, and examine the impact of ionic type and concentration on shale’s stability. Experimental methods include utilisation of two different shale cores (I and II), in which each core is cut into several samples, to conduct linear expansion and gravimetric measurement tests using different salt solutions (KCl, NaCl, and CaCl2) of various salt concentrations. Results show that the critical salt concentrations of shale I and II is 8 w/w%. Chemical osmosis is found to be a reliable method for water extraction out of shale if the critical salt concentration value is not surpassed. Beyond this value, ionic diffusion and diffusion osmosis in shale I and II were adversely affecting shale’s stability through swelling. The swelling and gravimetric ions and water uptake tests showed that shale is a leaky semi-permeable membrane, and that chemical osmosis could be jeopardised by ionic transport into shale. In this study, the cation type (Na+, K+, Ca+2) that makes up the salt was varied. The impact of cation type on the stability of shale was clear as the anion type was fixed. Since both cations and anions tend to diffuse into shale in the presence of a concentration gradient, it is proposed for future work to study the combined impact of cation and anion types on shale’s stability by varying the anion and cation types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosystem Engineering\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosystem Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2023.2227181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosystem Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2023.2227181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要页岩地层中的井筒不稳定性是导致页岩岩石物理、力学和化学性质发生重大变化的最令人烦恼的问题之一,每年可能耗资数十亿美元。钻井液的离子组成是影响井筒稳定性的因素之一。本文研究了化学渗透、离子扩散和扩散渗透对页岩稳定性的影响,确定了临界盐浓度,并考察了离子类型和浓度对页岩稳定的影响。实验方法包括使用两个不同的页岩岩芯(I和II),其中每个岩芯被切割成几个样品,使用不同盐浓度的不同盐溶液(KCl、NaCl和CaCl2)进行线性膨胀和重量测量测试。结果表明,页岩I和II的临界盐浓度为8w/w%。如果不超过临界盐浓度值,化学渗透是从页岩中提取水的可靠方法。超过该值,页岩I和II中的离子扩散和扩散渗透通过膨胀对页岩的稳定性产生了不利影响。溶胀、重量离子和吸水测试表明,页岩是一种渗漏的半透膜,离子输送到页岩中可能会危及化学渗透。在本研究中,组成盐的阳离子类型(Na+、K+、Ca+2)各不相同。阳离子类型对页岩稳定性的影响是明显的,因为阴离子类型是固定的。由于在存在浓度梯度的情况下,阳离子和阴离子都倾向于扩散到页岩中,因此建议在未来的工作中通过改变阴离子和阳离子类型来研究阳离子和阴离子类型对页岩稳定性的综合影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental analysis of the impact of ionic concentration and type on shale’s stability: dilute vs. concentrated salt solutions
ABSTRACT Wellbore instability in shale formations is one of the most bothersome problems leading to significant changes in shale’s petrophysical, mechanical, and chemical properties, and could cost billions of dollars annually. Drilling fluid’s ionic composition is one of the factors affecting wellbore stability. This paper investigates the impact of chemical osmosis, ionic diffusion, and diffusion osmosis on the stability of shale, identify the critical salt concentration, and examine the impact of ionic type and concentration on shale’s stability. Experimental methods include utilisation of two different shale cores (I and II), in which each core is cut into several samples, to conduct linear expansion and gravimetric measurement tests using different salt solutions (KCl, NaCl, and CaCl2) of various salt concentrations. Results show that the critical salt concentrations of shale I and II is 8 w/w%. Chemical osmosis is found to be a reliable method for water extraction out of shale if the critical salt concentration value is not surpassed. Beyond this value, ionic diffusion and diffusion osmosis in shale I and II were adversely affecting shale’s stability through swelling. The swelling and gravimetric ions and water uptake tests showed that shale is a leaky semi-permeable membrane, and that chemical osmosis could be jeopardised by ionic transport into shale. In this study, the cation type (Na+, K+, Ca+2) that makes up the salt was varied. The impact of cation type on the stability of shale was clear as the anion type was fixed. Since both cations and anions tend to diffuse into shale in the presence of a concentration gradient, it is proposed for future work to study the combined impact of cation and anion types on shale’s stability by varying the anion and cation types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosystem Engineering
Geosystem Engineering GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信