确诊感染SARS-CoV-2的未接种疫苗的无症状和有症状家庭成员对SARS-CoV-2的家庭传播:一项抗体监测研究

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220026
M. Bhatt, A. Plint, K. Tang, R. Malley, Anne Pham Huy, Candice McGahern, Jennifer Dawson, M. Pelchat, Lauren Dawson, T. Varshney, C. Arnold, Y. Galipeau, Michael Austin, N. Thampi, F. Alnaji, Marc-André Langlois, R. Zemek
{"title":"确诊感染SARS-CoV-2的未接种疫苗的无症状和有症状家庭成员对SARS-CoV-2的家庭传播:一项抗体监测研究","authors":"M. Bhatt, A. Plint, K. Tang, R. Malley, Anne Pham Huy, Candice McGahern, Jennifer Dawson, M. Pelchat, Lauren Dawson, T. Varshney, C. Arnold, Y. Galipeau, Michael Austin, N. Thampi, F. Alnaji, Marc-André Langlois, R. Zemek","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Household transmission contributes to SARS-CoV-2 spread, but the role of children in transmission is unclear. We conducted a study that included symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in their households with the objective of determining how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted within households. Methods: In this case-ascertained antibody-surveillance study, we enrolled households in Ottawa, Ontario, in which at least 1 household member had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The enrolment period was September 2020 to March 2021. Potentially eligible participants were identified if they had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an academic emergency department or affiliated testing centre; people who learned about the study through the media could also self-identify for participation. At least 2 participants were required for a household to be eligible for study participation, and at least 1 enrolled participant per household had to be a child (age < 18 yr). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM and IgG against the spike-trimer and nucleocapsid protein. The primary outcome was household secondary attack rate, defined as the proportion of household contacts positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody among the total number of household contacts participating in the study. We performed descriptive statistics at both the individual and household levels. To estimate and compare outcomes between patient subgroups, and to examine predictors of household transmission, we fitted a series of multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering of individuals within households. Results: We enrolled 695 participants from 180 households: 180 index participants (74 children, 106 adults) and 515 of their household contacts (266 children, 249 adults). A total of 487 household contacts (94.6%) (246 children, 241 adults) had SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, of whom 239 had a positive result (secondary attack rate 49.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.9%–55.3%). Eighty-eight (36.8%, 95% CI 29.3%–43.2%) of the 239 were asymptomatic; asymptomatic rates were similar for children (51/130 [39.2%, 95% CI 30.7%–48.5%]) and adults (37/115 [32.2%, 95% CI 24.2%–41.4%]) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8–2.1). Adults were more likely than children to transmit SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.6). The odds of transmission from asymptomatic (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2–1.4) versus symptomatic (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.4) index participants to household contacts was uncertain. Predictors of household transmission included household density (number of people per bedroom), relationship to index participant and number of cases in the household. Interpretation: The rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within households was nearly 50% during the study period, and children were an important source of spread. The findings suggest that children are an important driver of the COVID-19 pandemic; this should inform public health policy.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from unvaccinated asymptomatic and symptomatic household members with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: an antibody-surveillance study\",\"authors\":\"M. Bhatt, A. Plint, K. Tang, R. Malley, Anne Pham Huy, Candice McGahern, Jennifer Dawson, M. Pelchat, Lauren Dawson, T. Varshney, C. Arnold, Y. Galipeau, Michael Austin, N. Thampi, F. Alnaji, Marc-André Langlois, R. Zemek\",\"doi\":\"10.9778/cmajo.20220026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Household transmission contributes to SARS-CoV-2 spread, but the role of children in transmission is unclear. We conducted a study that included symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in their households with the objective of determining how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted within households. Methods: In this case-ascertained antibody-surveillance study, we enrolled households in Ottawa, Ontario, in which at least 1 household member had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The enrolment period was September 2020 to March 2021. Potentially eligible participants were identified if they had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an academic emergency department or affiliated testing centre; people who learned about the study through the media could also self-identify for participation. At least 2 participants were required for a household to be eligible for study participation, and at least 1 enrolled participant per household had to be a child (age < 18 yr). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM and IgG against the spike-trimer and nucleocapsid protein. The primary outcome was household secondary attack rate, defined as the proportion of household contacts positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody among the total number of household contacts participating in the study. We performed descriptive statistics at both the individual and household levels. To estimate and compare outcomes between patient subgroups, and to examine predictors of household transmission, we fitted a series of multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering of individuals within households. Results: We enrolled 695 participants from 180 households: 180 index participants (74 children, 106 adults) and 515 of their household contacts (266 children, 249 adults). A total of 487 household contacts (94.6%) (246 children, 241 adults) had SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, of whom 239 had a positive result (secondary attack rate 49.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.9%–55.3%). Eighty-eight (36.8%, 95% CI 29.3%–43.2%) of the 239 were asymptomatic; asymptomatic rates were similar for children (51/130 [39.2%, 95% CI 30.7%–48.5%]) and adults (37/115 [32.2%, 95% CI 24.2%–41.4%]) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8–2.1). Adults were more likely than children to transmit SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.6). The odds of transmission from asymptomatic (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2–1.4) versus symptomatic (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.4) index participants to household contacts was uncertain. Predictors of household transmission included household density (number of people per bedroom), relationship to index participant and number of cases in the household. Interpretation: The rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within households was nearly 50% during the study period, and children were an important source of spread. The findings suggest that children are an important driver of the COVID-19 pandemic; this should inform public health policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:家庭传播有助于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的传播,但儿童在传播中的作用尚不清楚。我们进行了一项研究,包括在家庭中接触严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的有症状和无症状儿童和成年人,目的是确定严重急性呼吸系综合征病毒2型是如何在家庭中传播的。方法:在这项确定病例的抗体监测研究中,我们招募了安大略省渥太华的家庭,其中至少有一名家庭成员在逆转录聚合酶链式反应检测中检测出严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型呈阳性。入学时间为2020年9月至2021年3月。如果参与者在学术急诊科或附属检测中心的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测呈阳性,则确定他们可能符合条件;通过媒体了解这项研究的人也可以自我认同参与。一个家庭至少需要2名参与者才有资格参加研究,每个家庭至少有1名注册参与者必须是儿童(年龄<18岁)。酶联免疫吸附测定用于评估针对刺突三聚体和核衣壳蛋白的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型特异性IgA、IgM和IgG。主要结果是家庭二次发病率,定义为参与研究的家庭接触者总数中严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗体阳性的家庭接触人数的比例。我们在个人和家庭层面进行了描述性统计。为了估计和比较患者亚组之间的结果,并检查家庭传播的预测因素,我们拟合了一系列具有稳健标准误差的多变量逻辑回归,以解释家庭中个体的聚类。结果:我们招募了来自180个家庭的695名参与者:180名指数参与者(74名儿童,106名成年人)和515名他们的家庭联系人(266名儿童,249名成年人)。共有487名家庭接触者(94.6%)(246名儿童,241名成年人)进行了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗体检测,其中239人结果呈阳性(二次发病率49.1%,95%置信区间42.9%-55.3%)。239人中有88人(36.8%,95%可信区间29.3%-43.2%)无症状;儿童(51/130[39.2%,95%CI 30.7%-48.5%])和成人(37/115[32.2%,95%CI24.2%-41.4%])的无症状感染率相似(比值比[OR]1.3,95%CI0.8-2.1)。成人比儿童更有可能传播严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型(OR 2.2,95%CI1.3-3.6)。无症状(OR 0.6,95%CI0.2-1.4)与有症状(OR 0.9,95%CI0.6-1.4)的传播几率指数参与者与家人的联系尚不确定。家庭传播的预测因素包括家庭密度(每间卧室的人数)、与指数参与者的关系以及家庭中的病例数。解读:在研究期间,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型在家庭中的传播率接近50%,儿童是传播的重要来源。研究结果表明,儿童是新冠肺炎大流行的重要驱动因素;这应该为公共卫生政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from unvaccinated asymptomatic and symptomatic household members with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: an antibody-surveillance study
Background: Household transmission contributes to SARS-CoV-2 spread, but the role of children in transmission is unclear. We conducted a study that included symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in their households with the objective of determining how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted within households. Methods: In this case-ascertained antibody-surveillance study, we enrolled households in Ottawa, Ontario, in which at least 1 household member had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The enrolment period was September 2020 to March 2021. Potentially eligible participants were identified if they had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an academic emergency department or affiliated testing centre; people who learned about the study through the media could also self-identify for participation. At least 2 participants were required for a household to be eligible for study participation, and at least 1 enrolled participant per household had to be a child (age < 18 yr). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgM and IgG against the spike-trimer and nucleocapsid protein. The primary outcome was household secondary attack rate, defined as the proportion of household contacts positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody among the total number of household contacts participating in the study. We performed descriptive statistics at both the individual and household levels. To estimate and compare outcomes between patient subgroups, and to examine predictors of household transmission, we fitted a series of multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering of individuals within households. Results: We enrolled 695 participants from 180 households: 180 index participants (74 children, 106 adults) and 515 of their household contacts (266 children, 249 adults). A total of 487 household contacts (94.6%) (246 children, 241 adults) had SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, of whom 239 had a positive result (secondary attack rate 49.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.9%–55.3%). Eighty-eight (36.8%, 95% CI 29.3%–43.2%) of the 239 were asymptomatic; asymptomatic rates were similar for children (51/130 [39.2%, 95% CI 30.7%–48.5%]) and adults (37/115 [32.2%, 95% CI 24.2%–41.4%]) (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8–2.1). Adults were more likely than children to transmit SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.6). The odds of transmission from asymptomatic (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2–1.4) versus symptomatic (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.4) index participants to household contacts was uncertain. Predictors of household transmission included household density (number of people per bedroom), relationship to index participant and number of cases in the household. Interpretation: The rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission within households was nearly 50% during the study period, and children were an important source of spread. The findings suggest that children are an important driver of the COVID-19 pandemic; this should inform public health policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信