Min Liu, Xianliang Wang, K. Yuan, B. Wan, Feng Yang, Shengwei Kang, Jie Li
{"title":"后负荷近距离治疗中不同施药器偏移值的验证研究","authors":"Min Liu, Xianliang Wang, K. Yuan, B. Wan, Feng Yang, Shengwei Kang, Jie Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy. \n \n \nMethods \nSix types of applicators were selected in this study which included stainless steel interstitial needle (Part#083.062), proguide round needle (Part#189.608), proguide sharp needle (Part#189.601), vaginal multi-channel applicator (Part#110.800), fletcher CT/MR applicator (Part#189.745) and henschke titanium applicator (Part#110.437). According to the sources imaging in the fluorography film, the distance of applicators between the first dwell position and the top could be measured. Marker was pasted on the surface of applicator corresponding to the first dwell position. And then the applicator was put into the pelvic phantom for a CT scan. During applicator reconstruction in the treatment planning system, the Offset values of all applicators could be acquired through adjusting the value of offset to superimpose the first dwell and the marker images. On account of the density of plastic material applicators were similar to human tissues, it was difficult to reconstruct the top of the applicator. With the help of stopper or simulation source, the value of offset could be acquired for plastic material applicators. Based on the measurement results, the differences were analyzed among different applicators. \n \n \nResults \nThe Offset values significantly differed among various applicators. The Offset value for stainless steel interstitial needle was -11.4 mm, -4.1 mm for proguide round needle, -3.5 mm for proguide sharp needle, 0 mm or -5.0 mm for vaginal multi-channel applicator, -6.5 mm for fletcher CT/MR applicator and -7.5 mm for henschke titanium applicator, respectively. \n \n \nConclusion \nTo adapt to the rapid development of precise radiotherapy, it is necessary to verify the Offset value in afterloading brachytherapy. \n \n \nKey words: \nApplicator reconstruction; Offset value; Radionuclide imaging","PeriodicalId":10288,"journal":{"name":"中华放射肿瘤学杂志","volume":"29 1","pages":"126-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A verification study of Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy\",\"authors\":\"Min Liu, Xianliang Wang, K. Yuan, B. Wan, Feng Yang, Shengwei Kang, Jie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.02.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSix types of applicators were selected in this study which included stainless steel interstitial needle (Part#083.062), proguide round needle (Part#189.608), proguide sharp needle (Part#189.601), vaginal multi-channel applicator (Part#110.800), fletcher CT/MR applicator (Part#189.745) and henschke titanium applicator (Part#110.437). According to the sources imaging in the fluorography film, the distance of applicators between the first dwell position and the top could be measured. Marker was pasted on the surface of applicator corresponding to the first dwell position. And then the applicator was put into the pelvic phantom for a CT scan. During applicator reconstruction in the treatment planning system, the Offset values of all applicators could be acquired through adjusting the value of offset to superimpose the first dwell and the marker images. On account of the density of plastic material applicators were similar to human tissues, it was difficult to reconstruct the top of the applicator. With the help of stopper or simulation source, the value of offset could be acquired for plastic material applicators. Based on the measurement results, the differences were analyzed among different applicators. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe Offset values significantly differed among various applicators. The Offset value for stainless steel interstitial needle was -11.4 mm, -4.1 mm for proguide round needle, -3.5 mm for proguide sharp needle, 0 mm or -5.0 mm for vaginal multi-channel applicator, -6.5 mm for fletcher CT/MR applicator and -7.5 mm for henschke titanium applicator, respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nTo adapt to the rapid development of precise radiotherapy, it is necessary to verify the Offset value in afterloading brachytherapy. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nApplicator reconstruction; Offset value; Radionuclide imaging\",\"PeriodicalId\":10288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射肿瘤学杂志\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"126-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射肿瘤学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.02.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射肿瘤学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.02.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A verification study of Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy
Objective
To investigate the Offset values of different applicators in afterloading brachytherapy.
Methods
Six types of applicators were selected in this study which included stainless steel interstitial needle (Part#083.062), proguide round needle (Part#189.608), proguide sharp needle (Part#189.601), vaginal multi-channel applicator (Part#110.800), fletcher CT/MR applicator (Part#189.745) and henschke titanium applicator (Part#110.437). According to the sources imaging in the fluorography film, the distance of applicators between the first dwell position and the top could be measured. Marker was pasted on the surface of applicator corresponding to the first dwell position. And then the applicator was put into the pelvic phantom for a CT scan. During applicator reconstruction in the treatment planning system, the Offset values of all applicators could be acquired through adjusting the value of offset to superimpose the first dwell and the marker images. On account of the density of plastic material applicators were similar to human tissues, it was difficult to reconstruct the top of the applicator. With the help of stopper or simulation source, the value of offset could be acquired for plastic material applicators. Based on the measurement results, the differences were analyzed among different applicators.
Results
The Offset values significantly differed among various applicators. The Offset value for stainless steel interstitial needle was -11.4 mm, -4.1 mm for proguide round needle, -3.5 mm for proguide sharp needle, 0 mm or -5.0 mm for vaginal multi-channel applicator, -6.5 mm for fletcher CT/MR applicator and -7.5 mm for henschke titanium applicator, respectively.
Conclusion
To adapt to the rapid development of precise radiotherapy, it is necessary to verify the Offset value in afterloading brachytherapy.
Key words:
Applicator reconstruction; Offset value; Radionuclide imaging
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology is a national academic journal sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It was founded in 1992 and the title was written by Chen Minzhang, the former Minister of Health. Its predecessor was the Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, which was founded in 1987. The journal is an authoritative journal in the field of radiation oncology in my country. It focuses on clinical tumor radiotherapy, tumor radiation physics, tumor radiation biology, and thermal therapy. Its main readers are middle and senior clinical doctors and scientific researchers. It is now a monthly journal with a large 16-page format and 80 pages of text. For many years, it has adhered to the principle of combining theory with practice and combining improvement with popularization. It now has columns such as monographs, head and neck tumors (monographs), chest tumors (monographs), abdominal tumors (monographs), physics, technology, biology (monographs), reviews, and investigations and research.