“洛多·莫罗”:恐怖主义与国家原因,1969–1986

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
John L. Harper
{"title":"“洛多·莫罗”:恐怖主义与国家原因,1969–1986","authors":"John L. Harper","doi":"10.1080/14682745.2022.2097589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cold War Italy was a land of mysteries. There are still blind spots in our knowledge of the deadly bombings that were part of the right-wing ‘strategy of tension’ in the 1960s and 1970s. Commentators continue to debate aspects of the kidnapping and murder of Christian Democratic grandee Aldo Moro in 1978, and the reasons for the destruction of an Italian civil airliner with 81 people aboard near the island of Ustica in June 1980. Only recently have magistrates identified with some degree of certainty the mandanti – the behind-the-scenes sponsors – of the Bologna train station bombing that killed 85 in August 1980. In this absorbing multi-archival study, Valentine Lomellini seeks to resolve another persistent mystery in the history of Cold War Italy: as foreign minister in the 1970s, did Moro arrange a secret ‘lodo’ (a deal implying a pay-off of some kind) with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and/or other Palestinian nationalist groups, to spare Italy from attacks? As she points out, Moro was a member of the progressive wing of the Christian Democratic Party (DC) which saw Italy as a bridge between the West and the developing world and looked sympathetically on Palestinian nationalism. Lomellini places the Italian attitude towards the sharp escalation of attacks in the early 1970s – accompanied by (and connected to) internecine conflict within the Palestinian resistance – in the broader European context. She examines European states’ deals to allow terrorists to depart to Gaddafi’s Libya, or other Arab destinations, in return for the release of hostages. An important case in point was the Austrian government’s September 1973 deal with terrorists who had taken control of a train carrying Soviet Jewish emigrants. Lomellini begins her careful reconstruction of Italian events the same month, detailing an operation conducted by SID (Servizio informazioni difesa, Italian military intelligence) and Mossad that led to the arrest of five men (a Lebanese, an Algerian, a Syrian, an Iraqi, and a Libyan) planning to use Soviet-made missiles to shoot down an Israeli plane departing from Rome’s Fiumicino airport. When the Black September organisation threatened Italy with severe consequences if the five were not released, the Italian government secretly requested Libyan intercession, extending the deadline. In October, Italian diplomats in Cairo met with an official PLO representative who offered a deal whereby Italy would be spared from attacks if it allowed the PLO to take custody of the five and try them. Although the evidence provided by Lomellini is incomplete and circumstantial, it is at this point that Moro and his colleagues appear to have made a key decision: to rely on Libya rather than the PLO. Despite its suspicions of Libyan complicity with the five (one of whom was a Libyan national) and its efforts to promote the fortunes of the moderate elements of Al Fatah within the PLO, the Italian government recognised that the PLO was unable to control extremist groups like Black September and thus could not be counted on to honour an agreement. By the end of October, two of the five (including the Libyan) were released from custody and flown on a SID plane to Tripoli whilst the remaining three were tried and then later released in February 1974. The metaphorical ink on Italy’s understanding with Tripoli (the exact nature of which is unknown) was hardly dry on 17 December 1973 when two teams of Arab terrorists attacked a PanAm airliner on the tarmac at Fiumicino, killing 30 people. A Lufthansa liner with hostages aboard was flown to Damascus, then Kuwait, where the hostages were released, and the hijackers taken – temporarily – into custody. The attack was the handiwork of the Libya-","PeriodicalId":46099,"journal":{"name":"Cold War History","volume":"23 1","pages":"331 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Il ‘lodo Moro’: terrorismo e ragion di stato, 1969–1986 [The ‘lodo Moro’: terrorism and reason of state, 1969–1986]\",\"authors\":\"John L. Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14682745.2022.2097589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cold War Italy was a land of mysteries. There are still blind spots in our knowledge of the deadly bombings that were part of the right-wing ‘strategy of tension’ in the 1960s and 1970s. Commentators continue to debate aspects of the kidnapping and murder of Christian Democratic grandee Aldo Moro in 1978, and the reasons for the destruction of an Italian civil airliner with 81 people aboard near the island of Ustica in June 1980. Only recently have magistrates identified with some degree of certainty the mandanti – the behind-the-scenes sponsors – of the Bologna train station bombing that killed 85 in August 1980. In this absorbing multi-archival study, Valentine Lomellini seeks to resolve another persistent mystery in the history of Cold War Italy: as foreign minister in the 1970s, did Moro arrange a secret ‘lodo’ (a deal implying a pay-off of some kind) with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and/or other Palestinian nationalist groups, to spare Italy from attacks? As she points out, Moro was a member of the progressive wing of the Christian Democratic Party (DC) which saw Italy as a bridge between the West and the developing world and looked sympathetically on Palestinian nationalism. Lomellini places the Italian attitude towards the sharp escalation of attacks in the early 1970s – accompanied by (and connected to) internecine conflict within the Palestinian resistance – in the broader European context. She examines European states’ deals to allow terrorists to depart to Gaddafi’s Libya, or other Arab destinations, in return for the release of hostages. An important case in point was the Austrian government’s September 1973 deal with terrorists who had taken control of a train carrying Soviet Jewish emigrants. Lomellini begins her careful reconstruction of Italian events the same month, detailing an operation conducted by SID (Servizio informazioni difesa, Italian military intelligence) and Mossad that led to the arrest of five men (a Lebanese, an Algerian, a Syrian, an Iraqi, and a Libyan) planning to use Soviet-made missiles to shoot down an Israeli plane departing from Rome’s Fiumicino airport. When the Black September organisation threatened Italy with severe consequences if the five were not released, the Italian government secretly requested Libyan intercession, extending the deadline. In October, Italian diplomats in Cairo met with an official PLO representative who offered a deal whereby Italy would be spared from attacks if it allowed the PLO to take custody of the five and try them. Although the evidence provided by Lomellini is incomplete and circumstantial, it is at this point that Moro and his colleagues appear to have made a key decision: to rely on Libya rather than the PLO. Despite its suspicions of Libyan complicity with the five (one of whom was a Libyan national) and its efforts to promote the fortunes of the moderate elements of Al Fatah within the PLO, the Italian government recognised that the PLO was unable to control extremist groups like Black September and thus could not be counted on to honour an agreement. By the end of October, two of the five (including the Libyan) were released from custody and flown on a SID plane to Tripoli whilst the remaining three were tried and then later released in February 1974. The metaphorical ink on Italy’s understanding with Tripoli (the exact nature of which is unknown) was hardly dry on 17 December 1973 when two teams of Arab terrorists attacked a PanAm airliner on the tarmac at Fiumicino, killing 30 people. A Lufthansa liner with hostages aboard was flown to Damascus, then Kuwait, where the hostages were released, and the hijackers taken – temporarily – into custody. The attack was the handiwork of the Libya-\",\"PeriodicalId\":46099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cold War History\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"331 - 333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cold War History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2022.2097589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold War History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2022.2097589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

冷战时期的意大利是一片神秘之地。在我们对20世纪60年代和70年代作为右翼“紧张战略”的一部分的致命爆炸的了解中,仍然存在盲点。评论员们继续就1978年基督教民主党大党阿尔多·莫罗被绑架和谋杀的事件,以及1980年6月一架载有81人的意大利民航客机在乌斯提卡岛附近坠毁的原因展开辩论。直到最近,地方法官才在一定程度上确定了1980年8月造成85人死亡的博洛尼亚火车站爆炸案的幕后赞助者。在这部引人关注的多份档案研究中,瓦伦丁·洛梅里尼试图解开冷战时期意大利历史上另一个持久的谜团:作为20世纪70年代的外交部长,莫罗是否与巴勒斯坦解放组织(PLO)和/或其他巴勒斯坦民族主义团体安排了一个秘密的“lodo”(一种暗示某种形式的支付的交易),以使意大利免遭袭击?正如她所指出的,莫罗是基督教民主党(DC)进步派的一员,该党将意大利视为西方与发展中国家之间的桥梁,并对巴勒斯坦民族主义持同情态度。Lomellini将意大利对20世纪70年代早期袭击急剧升级的态度——伴随着巴勒斯坦抵抗运动内部的内讧(并与之相关)——放在更广泛的欧洲背景下。她研究了欧洲国家允许恐怖分子前往卡扎菲的利比亚或其他阿拉伯目的地,以换取人质释放的协议。一个重要的例子是奥地利政府在1973年9月与恐怖分子达成的协议,这些恐怖分子控制了一列载有苏联犹太移民的火车。就在同月,洛梅利尼开始仔细地重现意大利发生的事件,详细描述了由意大利军事情报部门和摩萨德执行的一次行动,这次行动逮捕了五名男子(一名黎巴嫩人、一名阿尔及利亚人、一名叙利亚人、一名伊拉克人和一名利比亚人),他们计划用苏联制造的导弹击落一架从罗马菲乌米奇诺机场起飞的以色列飞机。当“黑色九月”组织威胁意大利称,如果不释放这五人,意大利将面临严重后果时,意大利政府秘密请求利比亚进行调解,延长了最后期限。10月,意大利外交官在开罗会见了巴解组织的一名官方代表,后者提出了一项协议,即如果意大利允许巴解组织拘留这五人并对他们进行审判,意大利将免受袭击。尽管Lomellini提供的证据是不完整和间接的,但正是在这一点上,Moro和他的同事们似乎做出了一个关键的决定:依靠利比亚而不是巴解组织。尽管意大利政府怀疑利比亚与这五人(其中一人是利比亚国民)串通一气,并努力在巴解组织内部促进法塔赫温和派的发展,但意大利政府认识到,巴解组织无法控制像“黑色九月”这样的极端组织,因此不能指望巴解组织履行协议。到10月底,五人中的两人(包括利比亚人)被释放,乘坐SID飞机飞往的黎波里,而其余三人则受到审判,后来于1974年2月获释。1973年12月17日,两伙阿拉伯恐怖分子在菲乌米奇诺机场的停机坪上袭击了一架泛美航空公司的客机,造成30人死亡,意大利与的黎波里之间的谅解(其确切性质尚不清楚)还没有干涸。一架载有人质的汉莎航空客轮被送往大马士革,然后是科威特,在那里人质被释放,劫机者被暂时拘留。这次袭击是利比亚军队一手策划的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Il ‘lodo Moro’: terrorismo e ragion di stato, 1969–1986 [The ‘lodo Moro’: terrorism and reason of state, 1969–1986]
Cold War Italy was a land of mysteries. There are still blind spots in our knowledge of the deadly bombings that were part of the right-wing ‘strategy of tension’ in the 1960s and 1970s. Commentators continue to debate aspects of the kidnapping and murder of Christian Democratic grandee Aldo Moro in 1978, and the reasons for the destruction of an Italian civil airliner with 81 people aboard near the island of Ustica in June 1980. Only recently have magistrates identified with some degree of certainty the mandanti – the behind-the-scenes sponsors – of the Bologna train station bombing that killed 85 in August 1980. In this absorbing multi-archival study, Valentine Lomellini seeks to resolve another persistent mystery in the history of Cold War Italy: as foreign minister in the 1970s, did Moro arrange a secret ‘lodo’ (a deal implying a pay-off of some kind) with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and/or other Palestinian nationalist groups, to spare Italy from attacks? As she points out, Moro was a member of the progressive wing of the Christian Democratic Party (DC) which saw Italy as a bridge between the West and the developing world and looked sympathetically on Palestinian nationalism. Lomellini places the Italian attitude towards the sharp escalation of attacks in the early 1970s – accompanied by (and connected to) internecine conflict within the Palestinian resistance – in the broader European context. She examines European states’ deals to allow terrorists to depart to Gaddafi’s Libya, or other Arab destinations, in return for the release of hostages. An important case in point was the Austrian government’s September 1973 deal with terrorists who had taken control of a train carrying Soviet Jewish emigrants. Lomellini begins her careful reconstruction of Italian events the same month, detailing an operation conducted by SID (Servizio informazioni difesa, Italian military intelligence) and Mossad that led to the arrest of five men (a Lebanese, an Algerian, a Syrian, an Iraqi, and a Libyan) planning to use Soviet-made missiles to shoot down an Israeli plane departing from Rome’s Fiumicino airport. When the Black September organisation threatened Italy with severe consequences if the five were not released, the Italian government secretly requested Libyan intercession, extending the deadline. In October, Italian diplomats in Cairo met with an official PLO representative who offered a deal whereby Italy would be spared from attacks if it allowed the PLO to take custody of the five and try them. Although the evidence provided by Lomellini is incomplete and circumstantial, it is at this point that Moro and his colleagues appear to have made a key decision: to rely on Libya rather than the PLO. Despite its suspicions of Libyan complicity with the five (one of whom was a Libyan national) and its efforts to promote the fortunes of the moderate elements of Al Fatah within the PLO, the Italian government recognised that the PLO was unable to control extremist groups like Black September and thus could not be counted on to honour an agreement. By the end of October, two of the five (including the Libyan) were released from custody and flown on a SID plane to Tripoli whilst the remaining three were tried and then later released in February 1974. The metaphorical ink on Italy’s understanding with Tripoli (the exact nature of which is unknown) was hardly dry on 17 December 1973 when two teams of Arab terrorists attacked a PanAm airliner on the tarmac at Fiumicino, killing 30 people. A Lufthansa liner with hostages aboard was flown to Damascus, then Kuwait, where the hostages were released, and the hijackers taken – temporarily – into custody. The attack was the handiwork of the Libya-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cold War History
Cold War History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信