克罗地亚、斯洛文尼亚和奥地利冠状病毒危机期间行政部门对民主的影响

IF 0.4 Q3 Social Sciences
H. Butković
{"title":"克罗地亚、斯洛文尼亚和奥地利冠状病毒危机期间行政部门对民主的影响","authors":"H. Butković","doi":"10.32422/mv-cjir.1771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Croatia, Slovenia and Austria, the coronavirus crisis raised pre-existing deficiencies in the democratic orders to the surface, i.e., issues in functioning according to democratic principles in the circumstances of a public health crisis. In Austria, the strained executive-legislative relations were already visible in April 2020, when the opposition parties refused to support the second wave of crisis legislation without the appraisal process that would justify its urgency. In Croatia and Slovenia, the governments decided not to declare a state of emergency, arguably in order to avoid cooperation with the opposition and other state institutions in drafting and passing crisis legislation. Finally, in Slovenia, the government used the crisis as a pretext to install its people into leading positions in several key state and public institutions. ","PeriodicalId":39183,"journal":{"name":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Executive Responses on Democracy During the Coronavirus Crisis in Croatia, Slovenia and Austria\",\"authors\":\"H. Butković\",\"doi\":\"10.32422/mv-cjir.1771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Croatia, Slovenia and Austria, the coronavirus crisis raised pre-existing deficiencies in the democratic orders to the surface, i.e., issues in functioning according to democratic principles in the circumstances of a public health crisis. In Austria, the strained executive-legislative relations were already visible in April 2020, when the opposition parties refused to support the second wave of crisis legislation without the appraisal process that would justify its urgency. In Croatia and Slovenia, the governments decided not to declare a state of emergency, arguably in order to avoid cooperation with the opposition and other state institutions in drafting and passing crisis legislation. Finally, in Slovenia, the government used the crisis as a pretext to install its people into leading positions in several key state and public institutions. \",\"PeriodicalId\":39183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32422/mv-cjir.1771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32422/mv-cjir.1771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在克罗地亚、斯洛文尼亚和奥地利,冠状病毒危机使民主秩序中存在的缺陷暴露出来,即在公共卫生危机的情况下根据民主原则发挥作用的问题。在奥地利,紧张的行政立法关系在2020年4月就已经显现出来,当时反对党拒绝支持第二波危机立法,除非经过评估程序来证明其紧迫性。在克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚,政府决定不宣布紧急状态,可能是为了避免在起草和通过危机立法时与反对派和其他国家机构合作。最后,在斯洛文尼亚,政府以危机为借口,在几个关键的国家和公共机构中安插了自己的人担任领导职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impacts of Executive Responses on Democracy During the Coronavirus Crisis in Croatia, Slovenia and Austria
In Croatia, Slovenia and Austria, the coronavirus crisis raised pre-existing deficiencies in the democratic orders to the surface, i.e., issues in functioning according to democratic principles in the circumstances of a public health crisis. In Austria, the strained executive-legislative relations were already visible in April 2020, when the opposition parties refused to support the second wave of crisis legislation without the appraisal process that would justify its urgency. In Croatia and Slovenia, the governments decided not to declare a state of emergency, arguably in order to avoid cooperation with the opposition and other state institutions in drafting and passing crisis legislation. Finally, in Slovenia, the government used the crisis as a pretext to install its people into leading positions in several key state and public institutions. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mezinarodni Vztahy
Mezinarodni Vztahy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信