{"title":"彼得罗与费尔伯恩版","authors":"Gary M. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2021.1972576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT John Fairburn's London firm published cheap print of many kinds, though often with a reformist political bent, over half a century from the 1790s. Among this prolific output was a poem entitled The Field of Waterloo in the year of that event. In price and address, however, this was somewhat of an outlier in their mass of sixpenny pamphlets. This essay examines the rhetorical and stylistic features of this pamphlet and its several contexts in the ongoing paper war over the French Revolution and its Napoleonic and post-Napoleonic aftermath. These contexts include the formation of a distinctive plebeian modernity, Fairburn’s usual stock in trade, as a form of cultural citizenship grounding claims to the political franchise.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"35 1","pages":"149 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peterloo and ‘Fairburn’s Editions’\",\"authors\":\"Gary M. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09524142.2021.1972576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT John Fairburn's London firm published cheap print of many kinds, though often with a reformist political bent, over half a century from the 1790s. Among this prolific output was a poem entitled The Field of Waterloo in the year of that event. In price and address, however, this was somewhat of an outlier in their mass of sixpenny pamphlets. This essay examines the rhetorical and stylistic features of this pamphlet and its several contexts in the ongoing paper war over the French Revolution and its Napoleonic and post-Napoleonic aftermath. These contexts include the formation of a distinctive plebeian modernity, Fairburn’s usual stock in trade, as a form of cultural citizenship grounding claims to the political franchise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1972576\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2021.1972576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT John Fairburn's London firm published cheap print of many kinds, though often with a reformist political bent, over half a century from the 1790s. Among this prolific output was a poem entitled The Field of Waterloo in the year of that event. In price and address, however, this was somewhat of an outlier in their mass of sixpenny pamphlets. This essay examines the rhetorical and stylistic features of this pamphlet and its several contexts in the ongoing paper war over the French Revolution and its Napoleonic and post-Napoleonic aftermath. These contexts include the formation of a distinctive plebeian modernity, Fairburn’s usual stock in trade, as a form of cultural citizenship grounding claims to the political franchise.
期刊介绍:
The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.