康德的两种感知功能

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
Hemmo Laiho
{"title":"康德的两种感知功能","authors":"Hemmo Laiho","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3865041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant uses terms translatable as ‘synthesis’ and ‘perception’ in different ways in different contexts,  which suggests that there are different kinds of synthesis and perception. I propose that there are two main basic functions of perception according to Kant: that of singling out a thing and that of  getting perceptually informed about the configuration of the thing’s perceptible features. I argue that the first function is not dependent on the kinds of syntheses Kant analyzes in the  Critique of Pure Reason  but grounds any such synthesis. I also argue that if singling out a thing is considered  to involve synthesis, then the term ‘synthesis’  is identified with a unification of sensory information itself, which is not of much consequence for the transcendental philosopher. The paper also aims to clarify what ‘manifold’ consist s  in and what the starting point of the ‘synthesis in apprehension’ might be.","PeriodicalId":41959,"journal":{"name":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"272-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Functions of Perception in Kant\",\"authors\":\"Hemmo Laiho\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.3865041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kant uses terms translatable as ‘synthesis’ and ‘perception’ in different ways in different contexts,  which suggests that there are different kinds of synthesis and perception. I propose that there are two main basic functions of perception according to Kant: that of singling out a thing and that of  getting perceptually informed about the configuration of the thing’s perceptible features. I argue that the first function is not dependent on the kinds of syntheses Kant analyzes in the  Critique of Pure Reason  but grounds any such synthesis. I also argue that if singling out a thing is considered  to involve synthesis, then the term ‘synthesis’  is identified with a unification of sensory information itself, which is not of much consequence for the transcendental philosopher. The paper also aims to clarify what ‘manifold’ consist s  in and what the starting point of the ‘synthesis in apprehension’ might be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"272-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3865041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3865041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

康德在不同的语境中以不同的方式使用可译为“综合”和“知觉”的术语,这表明有不同种类的综合和知觉。我认为康德认为知觉有两个主要的基本功能:一是挑出一件事物,二是从知觉上了解事物可感知特征的结构。我认为,第一个功能并不依赖于康德在《纯粹理性批判》中分析的各种综合,而是为任何这种综合奠定基础。我还认为,如果挑出一个事物被认为涉及综合,那么“综合”一词就等同于感觉信息本身的统一,这对先验哲学家来说并没有多大意义。本文还旨在澄清什么是“多元”,以及“理解中的综合”的起点可能是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Functions of Perception in Kant
Kant uses terms translatable as ‘synthesis’ and ‘perception’ in different ways in different contexts,  which suggests that there are different kinds of synthesis and perception. I propose that there are two main basic functions of perception according to Kant: that of singling out a thing and that of  getting perceptually informed about the configuration of the thing’s perceptible features. I argue that the first function is not dependent on the kinds of syntheses Kant analyzes in the  Critique of Pure Reason  but grounds any such synthesis. I also argue that if singling out a thing is considered  to involve synthesis, then the term ‘synthesis’  is identified with a unification of sensory information itself, which is not of much consequence for the transcendental philosopher. The paper also aims to clarify what ‘manifold’ consist s  in and what the starting point of the ‘synthesis in apprehension’ might be.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Con-Textos Kantianos aims at boosting the philological and critical research on Kant studies, considering also actual discussions on Kant''s thought. That is the reason why its heading hints to contexts with texts. Kant shall be the main focus of the journal, which will tackle subjects such as Moral and Political Philosophy, History of Ideas, Philosophy of Right, Philosophy of History, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Education, Aesthetics, Anthropology, Metaphysics and Epistemology, Human Rights, Social Policy, Theories of Justice and Cosmopolitanism. CTK aims at being an international and cosmopolitan inspired e-journal, where the Spanish language receives equal acknowledgement as English, French, German, Italian and Portuguese do. The main purposes of the journal are to enhance the development of a Kant scholarship network at the Latin American scale and to tighten the links between research groups already consolidated in different countries and languages. The editorial team, which gathers Kant scholars from Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Mexico and Spain, will certainly ease the fulfillment of both purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信