手术治疗上肢感染的急性期反应:回顾性分析

The Hand Pub Date : 2019-09-11 DOI:10.1177/1558944719873147
Erich M. Gauger, P. Mitchell, S. Halverson, D. O’Neill, Kaitlyn Reasoner, Mihir J. Desai, Donald H. Lee
{"title":"手术治疗上肢感染的急性期反应:回顾性分析","authors":"Erich M. Gauger, P. Mitchell, S. Halverson, D. O’Neill, Kaitlyn Reasoner, Mihir J. Desai, Donald H. Lee","doi":"10.1177/1558944719873147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are limited data on the use of acute-phase markers in the diagnosis of upper extremity infections. The goal of this study was to determine the percentage of patients with elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the setting of an upper extremity infection requiring operative debridement. Methods: In a retrospective review over 12 years, 61 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Results: C-reactive protein was the most sensitive test in the detection of culture-positive infection compared with ESR and WBC (P < .001, P < .0001, respectively). Ninety percent of patients (55 of 61) presented with an abnormal CRP value. The WBC count and ESR were abnormal in 54% and 67% of our cohort, respectively. Conclusions: C-reactive protein is the most sensitive laboratory test when evaluating upper extremity infections that necessitate debridement. The WBC count and ESR should be interpreted with caution and can be normal even in the presence of an infection.","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"16 1","pages":"546 - 550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1558944719873147","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute-Phase Reactants in Operatively Treated Upper Extremity Infections: A Retrospective Review\",\"authors\":\"Erich M. Gauger, P. Mitchell, S. Halverson, D. O’Neill, Kaitlyn Reasoner, Mihir J. Desai, Donald H. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1558944719873147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are limited data on the use of acute-phase markers in the diagnosis of upper extremity infections. The goal of this study was to determine the percentage of patients with elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the setting of an upper extremity infection requiring operative debridement. Methods: In a retrospective review over 12 years, 61 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Results: C-reactive protein was the most sensitive test in the detection of culture-positive infection compared with ESR and WBC (P < .001, P < .0001, respectively). Ninety percent of patients (55 of 61) presented with an abnormal CRP value. The WBC count and ESR were abnormal in 54% and 67% of our cohort, respectively. Conclusions: C-reactive protein is the most sensitive laboratory test when evaluating upper extremity infections that necessitate debridement. The WBC count and ESR should be interpreted with caution and can be normal even in the presence of an infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"546 - 550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1558944719873147\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719873147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719873147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:急性期标志物在上肢感染诊断中的应用数据有限。本研究的目的是确定上肢感染需要手术清创的患者中白细胞(WBC)计数、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和c反应蛋白(CRP)升高的百分比。方法:在一项超过12年的回顾性研究中,确定了61例符合纳入标准的患者。结果:c反应蛋白检测培养阳性感染最敏感(P < 0.001, P < 0.0001)。90%的患者(61例中的55例)表现为CRP值异常。WBC计数和ESR异常在我们的队列中分别占54%和67%。结论:c反应蛋白是评估需要清创的上肢感染时最敏感的实验室检查。白细胞计数和血沉应谨慎解释,可以是正常的,即使在感染的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute-Phase Reactants in Operatively Treated Upper Extremity Infections: A Retrospective Review
Background: There are limited data on the use of acute-phase markers in the diagnosis of upper extremity infections. The goal of this study was to determine the percentage of patients with elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the setting of an upper extremity infection requiring operative debridement. Methods: In a retrospective review over 12 years, 61 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Results: C-reactive protein was the most sensitive test in the detection of culture-positive infection compared with ESR and WBC (P < .001, P < .0001, respectively). Ninety percent of patients (55 of 61) presented with an abnormal CRP value. The WBC count and ESR were abnormal in 54% and 67% of our cohort, respectively. Conclusions: C-reactive protein is the most sensitive laboratory test when evaluating upper extremity infections that necessitate debridement. The WBC count and ESR should be interpreted with caution and can be normal even in the presence of an infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信