中央和横向媒体对贫困问题的讨论

IF 0.2 4区 文学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
J. Beukes
{"title":"中央和横向媒体对贫困问题的讨论","authors":"J. Beukes","doi":"10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages This article aims to analyse the discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. Poverty is therefore not surveyed merely as a historical-economic category but is analysed by considering idea-historical medieval views on “extreme scarcity”, or the way poverty was conceptualised in these last two stages of the Middle Ages. According to this analysis, this discourse on poverty manifests itself in five distinct phases. Against the backdrop of the early medieval understanding of poverty as “contingent” – the result of one or more “accidental” factors – a first discursive development took place in the second half of the 10th century. As a result of revolutionary developments in agriculture and commerce, the “new poor” slowly developed into a “class” of agricultural and manual labourers whose socio-historical position eventually had to be drastically revised from the late 11th century. A subsequent conceptual development, predominantly theological and juridical by nature and relying on a relatively unassuming yet crucial distinction between “owner” and “servant” ( dominus and servus ), replaced the articulated conceptual register of the poverty discourse of the early Middle Ages. From the 5th to the 10th centuries poverty was understood to be the result of accidens or accidental factors, but now it was reduced to a mere relation. Poverty now became a “problem” that had to be addressed as effectively as possible, employing this basic and reductionist distinction. Secondly, indicate group of individuals considerations, was the eventual result of the historical development of ideas about poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. What once was considered to be the result of involuntary and contingent factors, then reduced to a (simplistic) relation, and finally defined in economic terms as a “class”, was thus ultimately brought under discursive control as a “minority”.","PeriodicalId":42800,"journal":{"name":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Die diskoers oor armoede in die sentrale en latere Middeleeue\",\"authors\":\"J. Beukes\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages This article aims to analyse the discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. Poverty is therefore not surveyed merely as a historical-economic category but is analysed by considering idea-historical medieval views on “extreme scarcity”, or the way poverty was conceptualised in these last two stages of the Middle Ages. According to this analysis, this discourse on poverty manifests itself in five distinct phases. Against the backdrop of the early medieval understanding of poverty as “contingent” – the result of one or more “accidental” factors – a first discursive development took place in the second half of the 10th century. As a result of revolutionary developments in agriculture and commerce, the “new poor” slowly developed into a “class” of agricultural and manual labourers whose socio-historical position eventually had to be drastically revised from the late 11th century. A subsequent conceptual development, predominantly theological and juridical by nature and relying on a relatively unassuming yet crucial distinction between “owner” and “servant” ( dominus and servus ), replaced the articulated conceptual register of the poverty discourse of the early Middle Ages. From the 5th to the 10th centuries poverty was understood to be the result of accidens or accidental factors, but now it was reduced to a mere relation. Poverty now became a “problem” that had to be addressed as effectively as possible, employing this basic and reductionist distinction. Secondly, indicate group of individuals considerations, was the eventual result of the historical development of ideas about poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. What once was considered to be the result of involuntary and contingent factors, then reduced to a (simplistic) relation, and finally defined in economic terms as a “class”, was thus ultimately brought under discursive control as a “minority”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中世纪中后期的贫困话语本文旨在分析中世纪中后期关于贫困的话语。因此,贫困不仅仅是作为一个历史经济类别来调查的,而是通过考虑中世纪关于“极端稀缺”的历史观点或中世纪最后两个阶段贫困概念化的方式来分析的。根据这一分析,这种关于贫困的论述表现为五个不同的阶段。在中世纪早期将贫困理解为“偶然”的背景下——一个或多个“偶然”因素的结果——10世纪下半叶发生了第一次话语发展。由于农业和商业的革命性发展,“新穷人”慢慢发展成为农业和体力劳动者的“阶级”,其社会历史地位最终不得不从11世纪末开始大幅调整。随后的概念发展,本质上主要是神学和司法,并依赖于“所有者”和“仆人”(dominus和servus)之间相对谦逊但至关重要的区别,取代了中世纪早期贫困话语的明确概念登记。从5世纪到10世纪,贫困被认为是偶然或偶然因素的结果,但现在它被简化为一种纯粹的关系。贫困现在成为一个“问题”,必须尽可能有效地加以解决,采用这种基本的简化主义区别。其次,指出个体群体的考虑,是中世纪中后期贫困思想历史发展的最终结果。曾经被认为是非自愿和偶然因素的结果,后来被简化为(简单化的)关系,并最终在经济术语中被定义为“阶级”,因此最终被作为“少数群体”置于话语控制之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Die diskoers oor armoede in die sentrale en latere Middeleeue
The discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages This article aims to analyse the discourse on poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. Poverty is therefore not surveyed merely as a historical-economic category but is analysed by considering idea-historical medieval views on “extreme scarcity”, or the way poverty was conceptualised in these last two stages of the Middle Ages. According to this analysis, this discourse on poverty manifests itself in five distinct phases. Against the backdrop of the early medieval understanding of poverty as “contingent” – the result of one or more “accidental” factors – a first discursive development took place in the second half of the 10th century. As a result of revolutionary developments in agriculture and commerce, the “new poor” slowly developed into a “class” of agricultural and manual labourers whose socio-historical position eventually had to be drastically revised from the late 11th century. A subsequent conceptual development, predominantly theological and juridical by nature and relying on a relatively unassuming yet crucial distinction between “owner” and “servant” ( dominus and servus ), replaced the articulated conceptual register of the poverty discourse of the early Middle Ages. From the 5th to the 10th centuries poverty was understood to be the result of accidens or accidental factors, but now it was reduced to a mere relation. Poverty now became a “problem” that had to be addressed as effectively as possible, employing this basic and reductionist distinction. Secondly, indicate group of individuals considerations, was the eventual result of the historical development of ideas about poverty in the central and later Middle Ages. What once was considered to be the result of involuntary and contingent factors, then reduced to a (simplistic) relation, and finally defined in economic terms as a “class”, was thus ultimately brought under discursive control as a “minority”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Die Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe word gewy aan die publikasie van oorspronklike navorsing en oorsigartikels in die teologie, kuns en kulturele, sosiale, ekonomiese en opvoedkundige wetenskappe, sowel as aan boekbesprekings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信