{"title":"$\\ mathm {PL}_{+} I$的子群,不嵌入到Thompson的群$F$中","authors":"J. Hyde, J. Moore","doi":"10.4171/ggd/708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We will give a general criterion - the existence of an $F$-obstruction - for showing that a subgroup of $\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. An immediate consequence is that Cleary's\"golden ratio\"group $F_\\tau$ does not embed into $F$. Our results also yield a new proof that Stein's groups $F_{p,q}$ do not embed into $F$, a result first established by Lodha using his theory of coherent actions. We develop the basic theory of $F$-obstructions and show that they exhibit certain rigidity phenomena of independent interest. In the course of establishing the main result of the paper, we prove a dichotomy theorem for subgroups of $\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$. In addition to playing a central role in our proof, it is strong enough to imply both Rubin's Reconstruction Theorem restricted to the class of subgroups of $\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ and also Brin's Ubiquity Theorem.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subgroups of $\\\\mathrm{PL}_{+} I$ which do not embed into Thompson’s group $F$\",\"authors\":\"J. Hyde, J. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.4171/ggd/708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We will give a general criterion - the existence of an $F$-obstruction - for showing that a subgroup of $\\\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. An immediate consequence is that Cleary's\\\"golden ratio\\\"group $F_\\\\tau$ does not embed into $F$. Our results also yield a new proof that Stein's groups $F_{p,q}$ do not embed into $F$, a result first established by Lodha using his theory of coherent actions. We develop the basic theory of $F$-obstructions and show that they exhibit certain rigidity phenomena of independent interest. In the course of establishing the main result of the paper, we prove a dichotomy theorem for subgroups of $\\\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$. In addition to playing a central role in our proof, it is strong enough to imply both Rubin's Reconstruction Theorem restricted to the class of subgroups of $\\\\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ and also Brin's Ubiquity Theorem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4171/ggd/708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4171/ggd/708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subgroups of $\mathrm{PL}_{+} I$ which do not embed into Thompson’s group $F$
We will give a general criterion - the existence of an $F$-obstruction - for showing that a subgroup of $\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ does not embed into Thompson's group $F$. An immediate consequence is that Cleary's"golden ratio"group $F_\tau$ does not embed into $F$. Our results also yield a new proof that Stein's groups $F_{p,q}$ do not embed into $F$, a result first established by Lodha using his theory of coherent actions. We develop the basic theory of $F$-obstructions and show that they exhibit certain rigidity phenomena of independent interest. In the course of establishing the main result of the paper, we prove a dichotomy theorem for subgroups of $\mathrm{PL}_+ I$. In addition to playing a central role in our proof, it is strong enough to imply both Rubin's Reconstruction Theorem restricted to the class of subgroups of $\mathrm{PL}_+ I$ and also Brin's Ubiquity Theorem.