参与IPCC气候融资:社会与环境会计学者的行动呼吁和平台

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting

Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131

I. Thomson, Robert Charnock

{"title":"参与IPCC气候融资:社会与环境会计学者的行动呼吁和平台","authors":"I. Thomson, Robert Charnock","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has entered a new era, with insights from the social sciences now seen as critical to informing global policymaking decisions on the climate crisis. Previously, economists dominated the social science contribution through their proactive engagement with climate related intergovernmental bodies such as the IPCC. While this dominance has been criticised by academics from other disciplines, arguably they were somewhat complicit by their silence or assumptions that they would be sought out for input. It is worth noting that the IPCC does not commission research, but rather derives all its findings from existing scientific publications. However, the IPCC scientists need to know where to look for this work and for the content of these publications to be easily assimilated into their interdisciplinary deliberative processes .","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging with the IPCC on Climate Finance: A Call to Action and Platform for Social and Environmental Accounting Scholars\",\"authors\":\"I. Thomson, Robert Charnock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has entered a new era, with insights from the social sciences now seen as critical to informing global policymaking decisions on the climate crisis. Previously, economists dominated the social science contribution through their proactive engagement with climate related intergovernmental bodies such as the IPCC. While this dominance has been criticised by academics from other disciplines, arguably they were somewhat complicit by their silence or assumptions that they would be sought out for input. It is worth noting that the IPCC does not commission research, but rather derives all its findings from existing scientific publications. However, the IPCC scientists need to know where to look for this work and for the content of these publications to be easily assimilated into their interdisciplinary deliberative processes .\",\"PeriodicalId\":38053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)进入了一个新时代，来自社会科学的见解现在被视为为全球气候危机决策提供信息的关键。此前，经济学家通过积极参与IPCC等与气候相关的政府间机构，主导了社会科学的贡献。尽管这种主导地位受到了其他学科学者的批评，但可以说，他们的沉默或假设他们会被征求意见，在某种程度上是同谋。值得注意的是，IPCC并不委托进行研究，而是从现有的科学出版物中得出所有的发现。然而，IPCC的科学家们需要知道在哪里寻找这项工作，以及这些出版物的内容如何容易地融入他们的跨学科审议过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Engaging with the IPCC on Climate Finance: A Call to Action and Platform for Social and Environmental Accounting Scholars

ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has entered a new era, with insights from the social sciences now seen as critical to informing global policymaking decisions on the climate crisis. Previously, economists dominated the social science contribution through their proactive engagement with climate related intergovernmental bodies such as the IPCC. While this dominance has been criticised by academics from other disciplines, arguably they were somewhat complicit by their silence or assumptions that they would be sought out for input. It is worth noting that the IPCC does not commission research, but rather derives all its findings from existing scientific publications. However, the IPCC scientists need to know where to look for this work and for the content of these publications to be easily assimilated into their interdisciplinary deliberative processes .

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social and Environmental Accountability Journal (SEAJ) is the official Journal of The Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. It is a predominantly refereed Journal committed to the creation of a new academic literature in the broad field of social, environmental and sustainable development accounting, accountability, reporting and auditing. The Journal provides a forum for a wide range of different forms of academic and academic-related communications whose aim is to balance honesty and scholarly rigour with directness, clarity, policy-relevance and novelty. SEAJ welcomes all contributions that fulfil the criteria of the journal, including empirical papers, review papers and essays, manuscripts reporting or proposing engagement, commentaries and polemics, and reviews of articles or books. A key feature of SEAJ is that papers are shorter than the word length typically anticipated in academic journals in the social sciences. A clearer breakdown of the proposed word length for each type of paper in SEAJ can be found here.