黑格尔对Sorites的解读

IF 0.5 3区哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

History and Philosophy of Logic Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/01445340.2023.2189808

Franca d’Agostini

{"title":"黑格尔对Sorites的解读","authors":"Franca d’Agostini","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2023.2189808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hegel’s approach to soritical arguments (as well as to paradoxes in general) can be read as a kind of conjunctive paraconsistency: the ‘explosive’ effect of contradictions is avoided by assuming ‘the unity of the opposites’, so that contradictory conjunctions are not simplifiable. The paper reconsiders what Hegel says about the Sorites and justifies the conjunctive interpretation. The first section introduces the analysis, presenting the role of the Einheit Entgegengesetzter for contemporary theories of paradoxes. In the second section, the focus is on Hegel’s interpretation of the Sorites. The third section briefly considers some contemporary accounts of vagueness in the light of Hegel’s view so reconstructed. The last section summarizes the main results and explores some ideas about how to formalize a Hegel-inspired conjunctive view.","PeriodicalId":55053,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of Logic","volume":"44 1","pages":"132 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hegel’s Interpretation of the Sorites\",\"authors\":\"Franca d’Agostini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01445340.2023.2189808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Hegel’s approach to soritical arguments (as well as to paradoxes in general) can be read as a kind of conjunctive paraconsistency: the ‘explosive’ effect of contradictions is avoided by assuming ‘the unity of the opposites’, so that contradictory conjunctions are not simplifiable. The paper reconsiders what Hegel says about the Sorites and justifies the conjunctive interpretation. The first section introduces the analysis, presenting the role of the Einheit Entgegengesetzter for contemporary theories of paradoxes. In the second section, the focus is on Hegel’s interpretation of the Sorites. The third section briefly considers some contemporary accounts of vagueness in the light of Hegel’s view so reconstructed. The last section summarizes the main results and explores some ideas about how to formalize a Hegel-inspired conjunctive view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Philosophy of Logic\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Philosophy of Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2189808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2023.2189808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

黑格尔处理社会论证(以及一般的悖论)的方法可以被解读为一种连接的副前后一致:通过假设“对立面的统一”来避免矛盾的“爆炸性”效果，因此矛盾的连接是不可简化的。本文重新考虑了黑格尔关于索利特人的说法，并证明了这种联合解释的合理性。第一部分介绍了这一分析，提出了悖论理论在当代悖论理论中的作用。在第二部分，重点是黑格尔对索莱特的解释。第三部分根据黑格尔重构的观点，简要地考虑了一些当代关于模糊性的说法。最后一节总结了主要结果，并探讨了一些关于如何形式化黑格尔启发的合取观点的想法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hegel’s Interpretation of the Sorites

ABSTRACT Hegel’s approach to soritical arguments (as well as to paradoxes in general) can be read as a kind of conjunctive paraconsistency: the ‘explosive’ effect of contradictions is avoided by assuming ‘the unity of the opposites’, so that contradictory conjunctions are not simplifiable. The paper reconsiders what Hegel says about the Sorites and justifies the conjunctive interpretation. The first section introduces the analysis, presenting the role of the Einheit Entgegengesetzter for contemporary theories of paradoxes. In the second section, the focus is on Hegel’s interpretation of the Sorites. The third section briefly considers some contemporary accounts of vagueness in the light of Hegel’s view so reconstructed. The last section summarizes the main results and explores some ideas about how to formalize a Hegel-inspired conjunctive view.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

History and Philosophy of Logic 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： History and Philosophy of Logic contains articles, notes and book reviews dealing with the history and philosophy of logic. ’Logic’ is understood to be any volume of knowledge which was regarded as logic at the time in question. ’History’ refers back to ancient times and also to work in this century; however, the Editor will not accept articles, including review articles, on very recent work on a topic. ’Philosophy’ refers to broad and general questions: specialist articles which are now classed as ’philosophical logic’ will not be published. The Editor will consider articles on the relationship between logic and other branches of knowledge, but the component of logic must be substantial. Topics with no temporal specification are to be interpreted both historically and philosophically. Each topic includes its own metalogic where appropriate.