N400成分的功能及其在比喻语言处理研究中的应用:系统综述

Edgard Pereira Neves, A. Cravo, M. T. Carthery-Goulart
{"title":"N400成分的功能及其在比喻语言处理研究中的应用:系统综述","authors":"Edgard Pereira Neves, A. Cravo, M. T. Carthery-Goulart","doi":"10.46230/2674-8266-13-7263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrophysiological studies have increased in the field of Neuroscience of Language as they allow for detailed analyses of the temporal course of language processing. In figurative language research, the most employed technique is Event Related Potentials (ERPs). The N400 is the most studied ERP component and is usually described as a marker of difficulty or effort in semantic processing. However, many controversial results about N400 have been found. Two main reasons can be raised for these results: (1) methodological difficulties in controlling psycholinguistic variables that are known to affect language processing and (2) different interpretations regarding what the N400 indexes. In this systematic review our main goals are: (1) providing a general panorama of studies on the N400 component applied to metaphoric and idiomatic language and (2) discussing the different views adopted by researchers regarding functional N400 theories and how ERP studies of figurative processing fit into each of those theories. We found two main interpretations about the process which is indexed by the N400: N400 as a marker of lexical access or as a marker of semantic integration. We also found that this dichotomy has an impact on the choice of models to explain the results about figurative language processing.","PeriodicalId":34073,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem em Foco","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functionality of the N400 component and its application in studies of figurative language processing: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Edgard Pereira Neves, A. Cravo, M. T. Carthery-Goulart\",\"doi\":\"10.46230/2674-8266-13-7263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrophysiological studies have increased in the field of Neuroscience of Language as they allow for detailed analyses of the temporal course of language processing. In figurative language research, the most employed technique is Event Related Potentials (ERPs). The N400 is the most studied ERP component and is usually described as a marker of difficulty or effort in semantic processing. However, many controversial results about N400 have been found. Two main reasons can be raised for these results: (1) methodological difficulties in controlling psycholinguistic variables that are known to affect language processing and (2) different interpretations regarding what the N400 indexes. In this systematic review our main goals are: (1) providing a general panorama of studies on the N400 component applied to metaphoric and idiomatic language and (2) discussing the different views adopted by researchers regarding functional N400 theories and how ERP studies of figurative processing fit into each of those theories. We found two main interpretations about the process which is indexed by the N400: N400 as a marker of lexical access or as a marker of semantic integration. We also found that this dichotomy has an impact on the choice of models to explain the results about figurative language processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguagem em Foco\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguagem em Foco\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46230/2674-8266-13-7263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem em Foco","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46230/2674-8266-13-7263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在语言神经科学领域,电生理学研究越来越多,因为它们可以对语言处理的时间过程进行详细分析。在比喻语言研究中,最常用的技术是事件相关电位。N400是研究最多的ERP组件,通常被描述为语义处理中困难或努力的标志。然而,关于N400,已经发现了许多有争议的结果。这些结果有两个主要原因:(1)控制已知影响语言处理的心理语言学变量的方法学困难;(2)对N400指数的不同解释。在这篇系统综述中,我们的主要目标是:(1)提供一个关于应用于隐喻和惯用语言的N400成分的研究概况;(2)讨论研究人员对功能性N400理论的不同观点,以及比喻加工的ERP研究如何融入每种理论。我们发现了关于N400索引的过程的两种主要解释:N400作为词汇访问的标记或作为语义整合的标记。我们还发现,这种二分法对解释比喻语言处理结果的模型的选择有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functionality of the N400 component and its application in studies of figurative language processing: a systematic review
Electrophysiological studies have increased in the field of Neuroscience of Language as they allow for detailed analyses of the temporal course of language processing. In figurative language research, the most employed technique is Event Related Potentials (ERPs). The N400 is the most studied ERP component and is usually described as a marker of difficulty or effort in semantic processing. However, many controversial results about N400 have been found. Two main reasons can be raised for these results: (1) methodological difficulties in controlling psycholinguistic variables that are known to affect language processing and (2) different interpretations regarding what the N400 indexes. In this systematic review our main goals are: (1) providing a general panorama of studies on the N400 component applied to metaphoric and idiomatic language and (2) discussing the different views adopted by researchers regarding functional N400 theories and how ERP studies of figurative processing fit into each of those theories. We found two main interpretations about the process which is indexed by the N400: N400 as a marker of lexical access or as a marker of semantic integration. We also found that this dichotomy has an impact on the choice of models to explain the results about figurative language processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信