《玫瑰》特刊简介

IF 1.6 Q2 ECONOMICS
Vivek Chibber
{"title":"《玫瑰》特刊简介","authors":"Vivek Chibber","doi":"10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Review of Social Economics is intended to demonstrate, and to partially survey, the state of Marxian theory in the social sciences. As such, the articles have been selected not just for their contribution toMarxism, but also for their representativeness of the state of play within the theory in its many dimensions. It just so happens thatmost of the scholars are also at career mid-points, or even earlier, making this special issue something of a harbinger of things to come, as this cohort of theorists matures and further develops its research program. The timing is, inmanyways, propitious. In theUnitedStatesbut alsobeyond, ideas associated with the Marxian tradition have suddenly become quite popular again, to the extent that advocacy for socialism has entered mainstream political culture. For decades, themeremention of the ‘S word’ was anathema, and anyone advocating it taken as out of touch with reality, or even suspicious. But over the past five years, as the crisis of neoliberalism continues to grow and the political establishment seems to have little to offer, calls for a revival of social democratic and socialist ideas have taken off. In this context, we are pleased that the papers in this issue engage many of the ideas that are circulating within the revitalized intellectual culture. Oneof the central issues in political economy is the dynamics of the employment relation. Whereas themainstream economic tradition views it as consensual, Marxists have maintained that it is essentially exploitative. But in order to cash out the claim, Marxists face a conceptual and a theoretical challenge. Conceptually, they need to explain what distinguishes exploitative relations, so that the normative basis for the critique of wage labor is clarified. And theoretically, they need to explicate the mechanisms that sustain the dominance of employers over wage laborers. Nicholas Vrousalis undertakes the former task, while Korkut Erturk tackles the latter. Vrousalis both builds upon, and amends, the important work of John Roemer, who developed a novel account of exploitation in the 1980′s. Roemer forcefully restated the case for","PeriodicalId":46636,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY","volume":"79 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue of ROSE\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Chibber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue of the Review of Social Economics is intended to demonstrate, and to partially survey, the state of Marxian theory in the social sciences. As such, the articles have been selected not just for their contribution toMarxism, but also for their representativeness of the state of play within the theory in its many dimensions. It just so happens thatmost of the scholars are also at career mid-points, or even earlier, making this special issue something of a harbinger of things to come, as this cohort of theorists matures and further develops its research program. The timing is, inmanyways, propitious. In theUnitedStatesbut alsobeyond, ideas associated with the Marxian tradition have suddenly become quite popular again, to the extent that advocacy for socialism has entered mainstream political culture. For decades, themeremention of the ‘S word’ was anathema, and anyone advocating it taken as out of touch with reality, or even suspicious. But over the past five years, as the crisis of neoliberalism continues to grow and the political establishment seems to have little to offer, calls for a revival of social democratic and socialist ideas have taken off. In this context, we are pleased that the papers in this issue engage many of the ideas that are circulating within the revitalized intellectual culture. Oneof the central issues in political economy is the dynamics of the employment relation. Whereas themainstream economic tradition views it as consensual, Marxists have maintained that it is essentially exploitative. But in order to cash out the claim, Marxists face a conceptual and a theoretical challenge. Conceptually, they need to explain what distinguishes exploitative relations, so that the normative basis for the critique of wage labor is clarified. And theoretically, they need to explicate the mechanisms that sustain the dominance of employers over wage laborers. Nicholas Vrousalis undertakes the former task, while Korkut Erturk tackles the latter. Vrousalis both builds upon, and amends, the important work of John Roemer, who developed a novel account of exploitation in the 1980′s. Roemer forcefully restated the case for\",\"PeriodicalId\":46636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1896189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《社会经济学评论》的这期特刊旨在展示和部分考察马克思主义理论在社会科学中的地位。因此,这些文章之所以被选中,不仅是因为它们对马克思主义的贡献,还因为它们在许多方面代表了理论中的作用状态。碰巧的是,随着这批理论家的成熟和研究计划的进一步发展,大多数学者也处于职业生涯的中点,甚至更早,这使得这一特刊成为未来的预兆。从很多方面来说,时机是有利的。在美国和其他国家,与马克思主义传统相关的思想突然又变得相当流行,以至于倡导社会主义已经进入主流政治文化。几十年来,一提到“S”字就让人深恶痛绝,任何提倡它的人都认为它与现实脱节,甚至可疑。但在过去的五年里,随着新自由主义危机的持续加剧,政治体制似乎没有什么可提供的,要求复兴社会民主和社会主义思想的呼声高涨。在这种背景下,我们很高兴本期的论文吸收了振兴的智识文化中流传的许多思想。政治经济学的核心问题之一是就业关系的动态性。主流经济传统认为这是双方自愿的,而马克思主义者则认为这本质上是剥削性的。但为了兑现这一主张,马克思主义者面临着概念和理论上的挑战。从概念上讲,他们需要解释剥削关系的区别,从而澄清对雇佣劳动的批判的规范基础。从理论上讲,他们需要阐明维持雇主对工薪劳动者主导地位的机制。尼古拉斯·弗鲁萨利斯(Nicholas Vrousalis)负责前一项任务,科尔库特·埃尔图尔克(Korkut Erturk)负责后一项任务。Vrousalis既建立在John Roemer的重要作品的基础上,又对其进行了修正,后者在20世纪80年代发展了一部关于剥削的小说。Roemer有力地重申了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the special issue of ROSE
This special issue of the Review of Social Economics is intended to demonstrate, and to partially survey, the state of Marxian theory in the social sciences. As such, the articles have been selected not just for their contribution toMarxism, but also for their representativeness of the state of play within the theory in its many dimensions. It just so happens thatmost of the scholars are also at career mid-points, or even earlier, making this special issue something of a harbinger of things to come, as this cohort of theorists matures and further develops its research program. The timing is, inmanyways, propitious. In theUnitedStatesbut alsobeyond, ideas associated with the Marxian tradition have suddenly become quite popular again, to the extent that advocacy for socialism has entered mainstream political culture. For decades, themeremention of the ‘S word’ was anathema, and anyone advocating it taken as out of touch with reality, or even suspicious. But over the past five years, as the crisis of neoliberalism continues to grow and the political establishment seems to have little to offer, calls for a revival of social democratic and socialist ideas have taken off. In this context, we are pleased that the papers in this issue engage many of the ideas that are circulating within the revitalized intellectual culture. Oneof the central issues in political economy is the dynamics of the employment relation. Whereas themainstream economic tradition views it as consensual, Marxists have maintained that it is essentially exploitative. But in order to cash out the claim, Marxists face a conceptual and a theoretical challenge. Conceptually, they need to explain what distinguishes exploitative relations, so that the normative basis for the critique of wage labor is clarified. And theoretically, they need to explicate the mechanisms that sustain the dominance of employers over wage laborers. Nicholas Vrousalis undertakes the former task, while Korkut Erturk tackles the latter. Vrousalis both builds upon, and amends, the important work of John Roemer, who developed a novel account of exploitation in the 1980′s. Roemer forcefully restated the case for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: For over sixty-five years, the Review of Social Economy has published high-quality peer-reviewed work on the many relationships between social values and economics. The field of social economics discusses how the economy and social justice relate, and what this implies for economic theory and policy. Papers published range from conceptual work on aligning economic institutions and policies with given ethical principles, to theoretical representations of individual behaviour that allow for both self-interested and "pro-social" motives, and to original empirical work on persistent social issues such as poverty, inequality, and discrimination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信