给我举个例子!探索建立公众对评价理解的策略

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sarah Mason
{"title":"给我举个例子!探索建立公众对评价理解的策略","authors":"Sarah Mason","doi":"10.1177/10982140211061018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluators often lament that the general public does not understand what we do. Yet, there is limited empirical research on what the general public does know—and think—about program evaluation. This article seeks to expand our understanding in this domain by capturing views about evaluation from a demographically representative sample of the U.S population. This article also explores different strategies for describing program evaluation to the general public. Using an experimental design, it builds on previous research by Mason and Hunt, testing a set of hypotheses about how to enhance communication about evaluation. Findings suggest that public understanding of evaluation is indeed low, although two specific communication strategies—using well-known examples of social programs and including a why statement that describes the purpose of evaluation—can strengthen understanding among members of the public.","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just Give Me an Example! Exploring Strategies for Building Public Understanding of Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10982140211061018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluators often lament that the general public does not understand what we do. Yet, there is limited empirical research on what the general public does know—and think—about program evaluation. This article seeks to expand our understanding in this domain by capturing views about evaluation from a demographically representative sample of the U.S population. This article also explores different strategies for describing program evaluation to the general public. Using an experimental design, it builds on previous research by Mason and Hunt, testing a set of hypotheses about how to enhance communication about evaluation. Findings suggest that public understanding of evaluation is indeed low, although two specific communication strategies—using well-known examples of social programs and including a why statement that describes the purpose of evaluation—can strengthen understanding among members of the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211061018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211061018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

评估者经常哀叹大众不理解我们的工作。然而,关于公众对项目评估的了解和思考的实证研究有限。本文试图通过从美国人口统计代表性样本中获取关于评估的观点来扩展我们对这一领域的理解。本文还探讨了向公众描述项目评估的不同策略。使用实验设计,它建立在梅森和亨特之前的研究基础上,测试了一系列关于如何加强评估沟通的假设。调查结果表明,公众对评估的理解确实很低,尽管两种具体的沟通策略——使用众所周知的社会项目例子和包括描述评估目的的“为什么”陈述——可以加强公众之间的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Just Give Me an Example! Exploring Strategies for Building Public Understanding of Evaluation
Evaluators often lament that the general public does not understand what we do. Yet, there is limited empirical research on what the general public does know—and think—about program evaluation. This article seeks to expand our understanding in this domain by capturing views about evaluation from a demographically representative sample of the U.S population. This article also explores different strategies for describing program evaluation to the general public. Using an experimental design, it builds on previous research by Mason and Hunt, testing a set of hypotheses about how to enhance communication about evaluation. Findings suggest that public understanding of evaluation is indeed low, although two specific communication strategies—using well-known examples of social programs and including a why statement that describes the purpose of evaluation—can strengthen understanding among members of the public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信