私人冲突解决手段的宪法视角

Clarindo Epaminondas de Sá Neto, Georde Lucas Souza Diógenes, José Albenes Bezerra Junior
{"title":"私人冲突解决手段的宪法视角","authors":"Clarindo Epaminondas de Sá Neto, Georde Lucas Souza Diógenes, José Albenes Bezerra Junior","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article consistsin the delimitation of the place occupied by the private dispute resolution methods within theframe of the Brazilian constitutional order. More specifically, the main goal is to determinate if those methods can fall under the protective system of the eternal clauses, considering thattheir practices are associated with the access to justice, which, as a legal guarantee, is declared by the fifth article, XXXV, of the current BrazilianConstitution. The same Constitution, according to the 60th article, IV, protects that guarantee as an eternal clause. Thus, we investigate if and towhat extent the use of private dispute resolution methods can be found inserted in the core of the legal guarantee of access to justice. Suchrelation will be mainly explained with the help of the philosophical themes provided by the Contractualism and also by legal theory themesconcerning sovereign power and jurisdiction. In order to achieve this goal, this article employs the hypothetical-deductive method assisted by literature review and documental analysis.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"41 1","pages":"251-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectiva constitucional dos meios privados de resolução de conflitos\",\"authors\":\"Clarindo Epaminondas de Sá Neto, Georde Lucas Souza Diógenes, José Albenes Bezerra Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this article consistsin the delimitation of the place occupied by the private dispute resolution methods within theframe of the Brazilian constitutional order. More specifically, the main goal is to determinate if those methods can fall under the protective system of the eternal clauses, considering thattheir practices are associated with the access to justice, which, as a legal guarantee, is declared by the fifth article, XXXV, of the current BrazilianConstitution. The same Constitution, according to the 60th article, IV, protects that guarantee as an eternal clause. Thus, we investigate if and towhat extent the use of private dispute resolution methods can be found inserted in the core of the legal guarantee of access to justice. Suchrelation will be mainly explained with the help of the philosophical themes provided by the Contractualism and also by legal theory themesconcerning sovereign power and jurisdiction. In order to achieve this goal, this article employs the hypothetical-deductive method assisted by literature review and documental analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"251-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的在于界定私人争端解决方法在巴西宪法秩序框架内所占的地位。更具体地说,主要目标是确定这些方法是否属于永恒条款的保护制度,因为它们的做法与诉诸司法有关,作为一项法律保障,这是由现行巴西宪法第5条第35条宣布的。同一部宪法,根据第60条第4款,将这一保障作为一项永恒条款加以保护。因此,我们调查了私人纠纷解决方法的使用是否以及在多大程度上可以被插入到诉诸司法的法律保障的核心。这种关系将主要借助契约主义提供的哲学主题以及有关主权权力和管辖权的法理主题来解释。为了达到这一目的,本文采用了假设-演绎的方法,并辅以文献回顾和文献分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectiva constitucional dos meios privados de resolução de conflitos
The objective of this article consistsin the delimitation of the place occupied by the private dispute resolution methods within theframe of the Brazilian constitutional order. More specifically, the main goal is to determinate if those methods can fall under the protective system of the eternal clauses, considering thattheir practices are associated with the access to justice, which, as a legal guarantee, is declared by the fifth article, XXXV, of the current BrazilianConstitution. The same Constitution, according to the 60th article, IV, protects that guarantee as an eternal clause. Thus, we investigate if and towhat extent the use of private dispute resolution methods can be found inserted in the core of the legal guarantee of access to justice. Suchrelation will be mainly explained with the help of the philosophical themes provided by the Contractualism and also by legal theory themesconcerning sovereign power and jurisdiction. In order to achieve this goal, this article employs the hypothetical-deductive method assisted by literature review and documental analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信